A society can experience severe instability in the social, political, and economic domains when it is dominated by a hateful ideology. The very institutions that are supposed to be protecting the most vulnerable frequently become involved in targeting them, subjecting them to harassment, violence, and sometimes even deadly attacks. In India, this concerning dynamic has been more apparent since Narendra Modi assumed power in 2014. The growth of the extremist ideology known as Hindutva, which advocates for Hindu supremacy, has had a significant impact on the country’s governance. The objectives of its adherents are clear: they want to make India a country that values Hindu identity above all else, with limited room for religious minorities, especially Muslims. Violence and prejudice against these populations have increased as a result of this change, which has bred fear and divisiveness. This ideology’s effects are seen outside of India’s boundaries, causing serious issues on a worldwide scale. The Khalistan movement, which supports a distinct Sikh state, is at the centre of this conversation. This movement is often dismissed by Indian authorities as terrorism, yet it is essentially a legal fight for self-determination that is recognised by international law. India aims to divert attention from its governance failures and justify repressive measures against dissenters by labelling it as terrorism. The way the world perceives India’s performance on human rights and its dedication to democratic values is greatly impacted by this misinformation. These tensions have significantly increased as a result of recent events. Due to allegations of a plot to kill famous Khalistani leader Gurpatwant Pannun, a US court summoned National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and a former head of the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW). India aims to divert attention from its governance failures and justify repressive measures against dissenters by labelling them terrorism. According to reports, Amit Shah was directly involved in the 2024 extradition of Nikhil Gupta, which raised grave concerns about state-sponsored terrorism being carried out abroad. This concerning pattern serves as an example of how the Indian government may use extrajudicial actions to stifle dissent outside of its borders. Doval and Shah’s collaboration has had a significant impact on India’s foreign policy. Their strategies, which are characterised by aggressive exports of Hindutva ideology and murder plots, reflect a blatant disregard for diplomatic norms. This approach has alienated potential Western partners in addition to harming India’s international reputation. In light of an astonishing 400 percent increase in cyberattacks originating from India, Canada has officially designated India as a cyber-threat. This decision comes in the wake of the death of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian national, and the subsequent threats against Sikh separatists that have ignited international outrage. India’s actions reveal a larger agenda aimed at upholding Hindutva ideology and restricting the rights of minorities. Concerns over India’s plans to export authoritarianism globally are raised by the deliberate targeting of religious minorities and dissenters, which reveals a troubling reliance on state violence. Such tactics destabilise areas where extremist ideologies proliferate and erode democratic values. Furthermore, India’s long-standing propaganda war that Pakistan is responsible for terrorism is starting to fall apart. India’s diplomatic standing has been severely damaged by the revelation of extrajudicial executions and global conspiracies. The ongoing crisis between Canada and India, which involves high-ranking officials such as Amit Shah, is a prime example of this decline. In addition to straining bilateral ties, India’s failure to assist with enquiries into these incidents has tarnished its reputation internationally. The relationship between the US and India is also under strain due to allegations regarding RAW’s involvement in targeting activists on American soil. These actions jeopardize crucial geopolitical partnerships as Western allies reconsider their alliances with a nation increasingly perceived as authoritarian. The failed assassination attempt on Pannun, reportedly intercepted by US intelligence, underscores India’s troubling dependence on illegal operations that jeopardise its international credibility. India’s ongoing clandestine activities, which include espionage and cyberattacks, instil fear among diaspora communities and threaten democratic principles around the world. The integrity of democracies worldwide as well as regional stability are seriously threatened by the emergence of Hindutva. As India’s hegemonic tendencies grow increasingly obvious, Western democracies must reconsider their partnerships with the country. The world must remain vigilant against the effects of Hindutva’s global campaign, which underlines the urgent need for international accountability while also exposing the fragility of India’s democratic values in the face of growing extremism and diplomatic deterioration. Under the pretence of nationalism, hate crimes and acts of violence against minorities have become more commonplace, endangering not just India’s future but also the peace and stability of the entire world. The writer is a freelance Content Writer & Columnist. She can be reached at: rakhshandamehtab@gmail.com