• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Monday, July 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Umair Jamal

Umair Jamal

<em>The writer is a freelance journalist and a correspondent for The Diplomat, based in Lahore, Pakistan. His research focuses primarily on the analysis of South Asian security and politics. His work has been featured in number of renowned media outlets including Foreign Policy, Al-Jazeera, The National Interest, The Huffington Post, Asia Times, The News on Sunday, Pakistan Today and others. He can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter at @UmairJamal15</em>

The Afghan Peace and process

Published on: January 4, 2020 10:51 AM

The Afghan peace process appears to be back on track after weeks of uncertainty. In September 2019, Donald Trump declared talks between the US and the Taliban “dead” as the world waited for an agreement to end the United States’ longest war.

Trump’s decision stunned Pakistan, which had played a significant role in bringing Washington and the Taliban to the negotiating table. The Afghan peace process holds high stakes for Pakistan: Islamabad’s interests are directly tied to a successful outcome.

Washington’s desire to secure an agreement with the Taliban motivated Pakistan’s involvement in the Afghan peace process. Increasing economic pressure on Pakistan, which could explode if the U.S. imposes sanctions on Islamabad for its lack of assistanceon Afghanistan, has added to the country decisionto support Washington. Not more than a year ago, Washington openly opposed Pakistan’s case at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as Islamabad sought financial assistance to stabilize its failing economy. Over the last year, Pakistan led Washington closer to an agreement with the Taliban.

A peace accord between the United States and the Taliban also supports Pakistan’s interests. In the past, the country received immense pressure from the international community-including the U.S. and the Afghan government-as a result of its pro-Taliban policy. Now,Pakistan’s connections with the group are not only granting Pakistan Washington’s favor and assistance, but also vindicating Islamabad’s earlier policy of pushing for dialogue.

It’s important to note that the first meeting between the Taliban leadership and ZalmayKhalilzad, U.S.’s peace envoy for Afghanistan, after the collapse of peace talks, did not take place in Doha or Kabul, but in Islamabad. Moreover, the meetings coincided with the Afghan presidential elections, signifying the importance of Pakistan’s role in the peace process. It is likely that Pakistan refused to organize a meeting between the Taliban and Khalilzad at any other location than Islamabad. Arguably, in 2020, Pakistan can expect to have Washington’s support not only on the issue of Afghanistan but also in other areas such as the ongoing situation in Jammu and Kashmir. Going forward, it is in Pakistan’s interest to continue driving the conversation between the US and the Taliban on Afghanistan as the country remains a direct beneficiary of the process.

Washington’s desire to secure an agreement with the Taliban motivated Pakistan’s involvement in the Afghan peace process

Moreover, the progress concerning the peace process in 2019 means that attaining an agreement between Washington and the Taliban helps Pakistan’s Afghan policy. Pakistan is likely committed to the Afghan peace process to an extent where it attains an agreement between the U.S. and the Taliban.

It’s important to note that the Afghan government still doesn’t represent the Afghan peace talks. Additionally, a scenario where the Afghan political elite directly becomes a stakeholder in the peace process decreases Pakistan’s clout over the entire debate as it involves participants – particularly the Northern Alliance – that are not supporter of Pakistan’s Afghan policy. As it happened in 2019, from Pakistan’s perspective, it makes sense that the ongoing peace process remains central to negotiations between Washington and the Taliban. In this regard, Washington has only aided Pakistan’s plan: in a nutshell, 2019 showed that Washington is not dedicated to a peace process that pushes for a conversation which involves all major political stakeholders from Afghanistan. If anything, Washington is committed to bringing together stakeholders that are pivotal to the cause of gaining an agreement with the Taliban.

In this context, it’s unclear whether Pakistan would be enthusiastic about an agreement beyond a deal between the U.S. and the Taliban. As of now, Pakistan is in the attention of encouraging peace talks to ensuring a deal between Washington and the Taliban. We have already seen that the Afghan government has always criticized Pakistan’s direct assistance. In 2019, responding to a meeting between the Taliban and Pakistan’s leadership, Afghan government said that “Hosting a group which continues to commit violence goes against all the principles of relations between countries.” For the Afghan government, the exclusion from the peace process means a virtual rejection of their role in the peace process. However, for Washington and Islamabad, what matters going forward, is keeping the Taliban engaged so that an agreement can be reached. Currently, it is unclearwhen the U.S. and Taliban are going to meet again formally to reinitiate dialogue. However, whenever the talks begin, they are likely to focus on the interests of the stakeholders directly involved in the process. For now, Pakistan is assisting in attaining a settlement between the US and the Taliban which keeps the country’s role central to the parties involved.

Filed Under: Pakistan, Top Stories

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Over 232,000 Pakistanis completed online registration for Hajj 2027-2030

Trump says Netanyahu ‘knows who the boss is’ ahead of possible meeting

Egypt inaugurates massive Octagon defence headquarters

Three Khamenei sons attend funeral as Mojtaba remains absent

Funeral procession for Iran’s supreme leader begins in Tehran

Pakistan

Over 232,000 Pakistanis completed online registration for Hajj 2027-2030

Shehbaz Sharif, Asif Ali Zardari honour PAF officer killed while aiding woman

Eight tribesmen, young girl killed in Balochistan violence

Islamabad likely to host next round of US-Iran technical talks next week

Four AJK policemen abducted by banned JAAC members in Rawalakot

More Posts from this Category

Business

Oil prices ease after Opec+ boosts output targets

Opec+ approves further oil output increase as Hormuz exports start to recover

Pakistan’s expanding forest cover sweetens honey industry, boosts rural livelihoods

Rapid urbanisation, demands for better civic facilities puts housing sector under strain in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Experts stress need to preserve Indus Waters Treaty amid regional tensions

More Posts from this Category

World

Trump says Netanyahu ‘knows who the boss is’ ahead of possible meeting

Egypt inaugurates massive Octagon defence headquarters

Three Khamenei sons attend funeral as Mojtaba remains absent

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}