• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Daily Times Monitor

Govt seeks stay on army chief extension ruling

Published on: January 3, 2020 2:04 AM

Govt seeks stay on army chief extension rulingThe federal government on Thursday sought a stay order from the Supreme Court against its November 28 verdict in the army chief extension of service case, a private TV channel reported.

The government in its plea requested the apex court ‘to accept the application and suspend/stay the operation of the impugned judgment dated November 28, 2019, in the interest of justice’.

This is the second petition filed in this high-profile case by the government.

On December 26, the law ministry had approached the top court against its detailed judgement issued on December 16, in which the federation was ordered to legislate on the matter within six months.

“The petitioners have a strong prima facie case to succeed; hence the operation of the impugned judgement may be suspended/stayed till the final decision of this civil review petition,” the petition filed on Thursday prayed to the court. It further stated that the ‘balance of convenience lies in favour of the petitioners’ and if the ‘injunction as prayed is not granted, the petitioners will suffer an irreparable loss’. It also asked the chief justice to constitute a larger bench comprising five judges to hear the review petition.

In its previous petition against the detailed order, the government had pleaded the court to keep the proceedings in-camera. The petition had further argued that the top court’s verdict did not take into account ‘important constitutional and legal’ points. It had stated that the apex court had itself ‘been giving extensions to additional and ad-hoc judges’, making a case for the government to exercise this discretion as well.

Filed Under: Pakistan, Top Stories

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Pakistan secured a convincing 3-0 victory over the Maldives

Oil falls on hopes of broader peace after Lebanon, Israel halt fighting

Meat exports grow by 4.16%

SBP-held foreign reserves rise by $43m to $17.9bn

Gold prices up by Rs 1,523 per tola

Pakistan

Bilawal seeks heavy public mandate to protect GB’s rights

PM directs pilot launch of automated tax collection system in Islamabad

Federal budget on June 10

PM hails special ties with Washington at event marking US 250th anniversary

FO rubbishes reports of Dar sharing Iran nuclear information with Rubio

More Posts from this Category

Business

Rupee strengthens against dollar

Pakistan’s exports to US up by 1.70% to $5.12bn in 10 months

Pakistan, Tajikistan set $200 million trade target, deepen ties at 8th JCM

Services’ exports up by 17.68% to $8.26bn

OGDCL’s new wells deliver record oil, gas output in FY26

More Posts from this Category

World

No sign of progress in US-Iran talks as Hezbollah rejects truce

Vast accelerates race to replace ISS

Gulf crisis drives India-Venezuela oil partnership

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.