• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Javed Iqbal

Cross-Border Terrorism Will Not Go Unanswered

Published on: February 23, 2026 3:13 AM

February 23, 2026 by Javed Iqbal

On Sunday morning, Pakistan struck seven terrorist camps and hideouts belonging to Fitna al Khwarij along the Afghan border. The action was taken in the aftermath of recent suicide bombing incidents in Bannu. Pakistan has conclusive evidence that these acts of terrorism were perpetrated by Khwarij at the behest of their Afghanistan-based leadership and handlers.

As expected, a propaganda campaign was launched, hurling accusations that innocent civilians were targeted. However, these allegations are baseless. Pakistan conducted targeted operations against Fitna al Khawarij (FAK) and ISKP elements operating from Afghan border sanctuaries, focusing on terrorist camps and hideouts, not civilian infrastructure. Claims of targeting civilians are false and malicious, designed to shield terrorists. FAK uses civilian areas and human shields, but Pakistan’s operations take this into account and aim to minimise collateral damage.

Additionally, Afghan media and affiliated platforms falsely accused Pakistan of targeting a mosque and a madrassah. Pakistan’s action was a proportionate response to ongoing terror attacks on civilians and security forces. Pakistan respects sacred places and does not target them; however, terrorists misuse religious cover for their operations.

The strikes targeted FAK terror infrastructure, and Pakistan’s stance has been unequivocal from day one: these terrorists cannot be called Muslims, as their actions contradict the teachings of Islam. The operation was an act of counterterrorism in self-defence, focused on the terrorists’ leadership and infrastructure, not Afghan civilians or forces.

Pakistan has repeatedly raised concerns over FAK sanctuaries with Afghan authorities and sought verifiable measures, but to no avail. The Afghan rulers need to understand that sovereignty cannot be used as a shield for cross-border terrorism; denying sanctuaries is key to regional stability.

Pakistan’s efforts are part of a sustained nationwide campaign, with 75,175 intelligence-based operations conducted in 2025, averaging 206 per day.

Pakistan will act against imminent threats and has conducted significant internal counterterrorism operations, eliminating terrorists while making sacrifices in both its security forces and civilian population. Pakistan’s efforts are part of a sustained nationwide campaign, with 75,175 intelligence-based operations conducted in 2025, averaging 206 per day. The solution lies in joint, verifiable action against FAK. Afghan authorities should dismantle FAK camps, disrupt facilitation networks, and cooperate to prevent further action. Pakistan’s stance is grounded in case linkages and traced facilitation, including attacks carried out at the behest of Afghanistan-based commanders.

Pakistan seeks negotiated and verifiable arrangements, but the problem persists due to the lack of action against the terror infrastructure. The Taliban regime needs to demonstrate clarity and cooperation to address the issue. Pakistan’s action was directed against terrorists, not Afghanistan or its forces. Any hostile action that enables or protects terrorists will be viewed as abetting terrorism, and Pakistan will take necessary defensive measures to protect its citizens.

The writer is a freelance columnist and contributes regularly on issues concerning national security.

Filed Under: Op-Ed Tagged With: cross-border, Terrorism

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Oil falls on hopes of broader peace after Lebanon, Israel halt fighting

Meat exports grow by 4.16%

SBP-held foreign reserves rise by $43m to $17.9bn

Gold prices up by Rs 1,523 per tola

Rupee strengthens against dollar

Pakistan

Bilawal seeks heavy public mandate to protect GB’s rights

PM directs pilot launch of automated tax collection system in Islamabad

Federal budget on June 10

PM hails special ties with Washington at event marking US 250th anniversary

FO rubbishes reports of Dar sharing Iran nuclear information with Rubio

More Posts from this Category

Business

Pakistan’s exports to US up by 1.70% to $5.12bn in 10 months

Pakistan, Tajikistan set $200 million trade target, deepen ties at 8th JCM

Services’ exports up by 17.68% to $8.26bn

OGDCL’s new wells deliver record oil, gas output in FY26

Buying returns as PSX gains nearly 1,000 points

More Posts from this Category

World

No sign of progress in US-Iran talks as Hezbollah rejects truce

Vast accelerates race to replace ISS

Gulf crisis drives India-Venezuela oil partnership

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.