• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Dr. Zia Ahmed

Crisis of Teaching in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Published on: December 29, 2025 1:41 AM

December 29, 2025 by Dr. Zia Ahmed

Everyone in Pakistan tends to place almost all responsibility for learners’ academic, social, and even moral development on the classroom teacher. At times, this responsibility is extended beyond the teacher’s own classroom, holding them accountable for outcomes over which they have little or no control. Universities, for instance, and their administrative structures are often quick to blame teachers for perceived shortcomings, repeatedly suggesting that teachers must invest more emotional, psychological, social, educational, and administrative effort into their teaching. Recently, following the tragic death of a student at a private university in Lahore, it was, thankfully, acknowledged that teachers, too, experience stress and pressure. They carry social, political, and financial burdens alongside the routine demands of maintaining their mental and physical health. This broader context calls for serious attention to teachers’ well-being, as only a supported and healthy teacher can meet the expectations imposed by institutions and society at large.

At the same time, nations across the world are undergoing another form of trauma triggered by the rapid rise of artificial intelligence, which has inevitably entered the classroom. Teachers are now expected to cope with AI in every possible way, regardless of the fact that they have been formally trained in it or possess no prior knowledge or skills at all. In many instances, teachers are forced to confront the fear that their professional role is under threat and that many of the tasks they perform in the classroom can be executed more efficiently by AI tools, to which students already have open access. In this context, teachers are advised to shift from being the “sage on the stage” to the “guide on the side,” facilitating learning rather than enforcing rigid instruction. They are further expected to impart usable, employable, and market-oriented skills. The irony, however, is that a significant portion of the country lacks the infrastructure necessary to integrate artificial intelligence into classrooms. The digital divide remains stark: many institutions lack devices, reliable internet connectivity, and the technical ecosystem required to benefit from AI-based tools.

The irony is that a significant portion of the country lacks the infrastructure necessary to integrate artificial intelligence into classrooms.

Moreover, teachers themselves are rarely provided with practical training or structured guidance to transition from traditional pedagogies to digital or cyber-based teaching practices. Compounding this problem is an examination system, particularly at the secondary and higher secondary levels, that continues to reward rote memorisation rather than creativity, critical thinking, or innovation. Examination questions are often lifted directly from textbooks, discouraging teachers from designing meaningful classroom activities or adopting pedagogies aligned with 21st-century learning needs. As a result, the education system operates in conflicting directions: teachers’ limited training and resources on one side, the demands of advanced, technology-driven societies on another, and outdated examination frameworks on yet another. In such a fragmented system, learners emerge confused and ill-prepared for the real world. When they encounter the job market, they discover a severe mismatch between their degrees and the skills required. This misalignment explains why many degree holders struggle to adapt to data-driven environments, machine-based technologies, and AI-oriented workplaces, ultimately contributing to rising unemployment.

In addressing these challenges, several reforms are possible, but the central component across all parameters, institutions, administration, infrastructure, curricula, and assessment is the teacher. The teacher remains the most critical entity requiring immediate and sustained investment. Teachers must be empowered not only to meet institutional and societal expectations but also to equip themselves with contemporary educational possibilities. There is an urgent need to provide teachers with foundational training in artificial intelligence and digital literacy, enabling them to understand the realities their students face in a highly competitive employment landscape. Classrooms must be supported with adequate digital infrastructure, including laptops, smartphones, and, crucially, high-speed internet connectivity.

At the higher education level, teachers require advanced training so they can effectively design employable, viable, and practical learning strategies. Today’s students often have access to international university lectures, cutting-edge research, and global pedagogical innovations. Teaching such learners demands teachers who are not only technologically competent but also intellectually agile and pedagogically innovative. Ultimately, to teach, train, and develop skills for contemporary learners, teachers must be highly motivated, mentally and physically fit, and well-equipped with AI tools and digital competencies. Equally important is an institutional environment that actively supports teachers both inside and outside the classroom. This is more significant regarding the research activities of the teachers that the institutions must reward the faculty financially because of the academic performance. The best teacher’s award on the basis of nepotism must be discouraged. For this, such systems can be designed to accurately measure the performance by passing it through multiple checks and filters that only the true knowledge seekers may be rewarded rather than expediency. This will contribute to the performance of the teacher because the happier the teacher, the more successful will be the institution. Only then can schools, colleges, and universities play their transformative role in society and contribute meaningfully to national development.

The writer is a professor of English at Government Emerson University, Multan. He can be reached at zeadogar@ hotmail.com and Tweets @Profzee

Filed Under: Op-Ed Tagged With: Artificial Intelligence, Crisis of Teaching

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Pakistan secured a convincing 3-0 victory over the Maldives

Oil falls on hopes of broader peace after Lebanon, Israel halt fighting

Meat exports grow by 4.16%

SBP-held foreign reserves rise by $43m to $17.9bn

Gold prices up by Rs 1,523 per tola

Pakistan

Bilawal seeks heavy public mandate to protect GB’s rights

PM directs pilot launch of automated tax collection system in Islamabad

Federal budget on June 10

PM hails special ties with Washington at event marking US 250th anniversary

FO rubbishes reports of Dar sharing Iran nuclear information with Rubio

More Posts from this Category

Business

Rupee strengthens against dollar

Pakistan’s exports to US up by 1.70% to $5.12bn in 10 months

Pakistan, Tajikistan set $200 million trade target, deepen ties at 8th JCM

Services’ exports up by 17.68% to $8.26bn

OGDCL’s new wells deliver record oil, gas output in FY26

More Posts from this Category

World

No sign of progress in US-Iran talks as Hezbollah rejects truce

Vast accelerates race to replace ISS

Gulf crisis drives India-Venezuela oil partnership

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.