• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Saman Zulfqar

Challenges for the Afghan reconciliation process

Published on: August 10, 2015 7:00 PM

August 10, 2015 by Saman Zulfqar

It is now widely accepted that
political transition in Afghanistan will remain inconclusive unless the reconciliation process with insurgent groups is successfully completed. Pakistan facilitated the first round of talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban in Murree on July 7, 2015. This process came to be known as the Murree peace process. The US and China also participated in the talks as observers. During the talks, both sides presented their stances on the prevailing situation in Afghanistan and how to move forward. The second round of talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government, scheduled to be held on July 30 in Pakistan, were postponed due to reports of Mullah Omer’s death. The negotiations were delayed amid fears of a split that might turn into a battle for succession among different factions of the Taliban movement. Mullah Akhtar Mansour, the deputy of Mullah Omer, was considered the most important contender to head the movement as he was appointed deputy by Mullah Omer himself and has been leading the Taliban movement for the past many years. He has been appointed as the new Taliban chief but in his first audio message he has not given any indication that the peace process should be taken to its logical end.
Dialogue with the Taliban has been the most challenging task so far. An important factor that hindered the reconciliation process from the beginning was the lack of trust among the three parties to the Afghan conflict regarding their divergent interests. The Afghan government and the US administration had diverging views on the reconciliation and reintegration process. Initially, the US agreed to reintegrate the mid-level Taliban into mainstream society but was unwilling to include top leadership in the reconciliation process, while at that time the Karzai government was willing to hold talks with Taliban leadership. The US’s unwillingness prevailed over the Karzai government’s intentions to hold talks and no development took place in this regard.
President Karzai, while highlighting the policy priorities of his government in 2009, identified peace and reconciliation as key areas of focus. To achieve this objective, the National Consultative Peace Jirga was convened in 2010, which succeeded in building national consensus on conditions under which direct negotiations between the Afghan government and the insurgent groups would take place. The jirga resolution proposed the establishment of a High Peace Council (HPC) that was established through a presidential decree in October 2011. The council was chaired by former Afghan president and prominent Northern Alliance leader Burhanuddin Rabbani. After his assassination in April 2012, his son assumed the chairmanship of the council. The HPC not just involved political actors to formulate the reconciliation strategy but also reached out to the neighbouring and regional states to get their support for the Afghan led peace process.
The failure of US military strategy to defeat the Taliban changed the US’s approach towards reconciliation with the Taliban as well and the Obama administration showed willingness to reach out to moderate elements within the Afghan Taliban. The US bypassed the Afghan government and held secret talks with the Taliban. In November 2010, direct contact between US officials and the Taliban was facilitated by German and Qatari officials in Munich, Germany. The preliminary talks started in February 2011 in Doha and came to be known as the Doha Process. The opening of a Doha office showed the willingness of the two parties to the Afghan conflict, the US and the Taliban, to negotiate. It also highlighted the desire to seek a political end to the war. Taliban representatives set preconditions for the release of five Taliban prisoners detained in Guantanamo Bay and, in return, they offered to release a US soldier, Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, held prisoner since 2009. The US refusal to agree on prisoners’ release stalled the Doha process, which could not be revived until after 18 months, when the Taliban agreed to resume talks.
President Karzai always remained distrustful of the US and other western partners regarding dialogue with the Taliban and this became evident from his criticism and opposition of the Doha Peace process. He boycotted the process mainly due to the Taliban’s use of the Islamic Emirates’ flag and plaque at the Taliban office and also suspended talks over the Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA). As a result, the US held back on direct talks with the Taliban. The new unity government of President Ashraf Ghani and Chief Executive Dr Abdullah showed willingness to resume a constructive dialogue with insurgents and invited the Afghan Taliban to join in a peace process. President Ashraf Ghani has been vigorously pursuing the task by asking for mediation from Pakistan and other states. Initially, Taliban representatives rejected the election process and the legitimacy of the new government, and presented pre-conditions for holding talks to end the Afghan conflict.
The Murree Process raised hope for the resolution of the Afghan conflict but the death of Taliban leader Mullah Omer has created uncertainty regarding the future of peace talks. The onus is on the new Taliban leadership to decide a future course of action and play a role in reducing the suffering of Afghans.

The writer works at the Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI) and can be reached at [email protected]

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Oil falls on hopes of broader peace after Lebanon, Israel halt fighting

Meat exports grow by 4.16%

SBP-held foreign reserves rise by $43m to $17.9bn

Gold prices up by Rs 1,523 per tola

Rupee strengthens against dollar

Pakistan

Bilawal seeks heavy public mandate to protect GB’s rights

PM directs pilot launch of automated tax collection system in Islamabad

Federal budget on June 10

PM hails special ties with Washington at event marking US 250th anniversary

FO rubbishes reports of Dar sharing Iran nuclear information with Rubio

More Posts from this Category

Business

Pakistan’s exports to US up by 1.70% to $5.12bn in 10 months

Pakistan, Tajikistan set $200 million trade target, deepen ties at 8th JCM

Services’ exports up by 17.68% to $8.26bn

OGDCL’s new wells deliver record oil, gas output in FY26

Buying returns as PSX gains nearly 1,000 points

More Posts from this Category

World

No sign of progress in US-Iran talks as Hezbollah rejects truce

Vast accelerates race to replace ISS

Gulf crisis drives India-Venezuela oil partnership

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.