The short order of the ‘special court trying Musharraf had left many questions unanswered. The detailed order that followed had no ambiguity as to the intent and purpose of the court and the mindset of the chief judge. Legal shortcomings apart, the language of the said decision has attracted scathing criticism at home and abroad. With a selected sprinkling of a few four-letter words, the expression would have done the downtown riffraff immensely proud.It also reflected a great deal onthe system that had brought the chief judge this far. The social media has given the judge tit-for-tat. But somber mindsseemed seriously concerned about his mental health. They recommendhis suspension until he getspsychologically rehabilitated. It will also be worthwhile to consider putting him in protective custody to save him from possible physical harm. The last few days had seenthe commencement of a sudden judicial offensive for no apparent reasonexcept a frustrated PM complaining about a subordinate court permitting Nawaz Sharif to make his escape good without worthwhile guarantees. Immediately after that in his first publicappearance, the Chief Justice (CJ) seemed visibly irritated in a ‘how dare you’ stance. He proudly recounted the accomplishments of the judiciary like sacking and disqualifying previous prime ministers. Then he had raised his arms in taunting mimicry of Musharraf and said that an ex-Army general’s case was also about to be decided. This provocative gesture of the CJ is thought to have spurred the junior judge into an abrasive action. Earlieran advocate, a known habitual spoiler had challenged theextension granted to the Army Chief. Perhaps overawed by the enormity of his challenge he had immediately withdrawn his application.It was not to be. It looked as if the Supreme Court was waiting for such an opportunity. It refused to let go the application and turned it into a Suo Moto notice.Moving with a super-sonic speed theCourt had reached its decision humbling both, the Chief Executive and the Army Chief in one swift blow. For the first time in history an ex-president and the Army Chief had been sentenced to death for high treason. The narrative built by the ‘Special Court’ is clumsy and unconvincing Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan said that the act of the supreme court was absolutely unnecessary and superfluous or words to that effect. Mr. Aitzaz had missed the inevitable “I”, the ego. Once it possesses a mind, it robs it off all the good sense and smothers the sense of proportion, the hallmark of wisdom. The venerable Chief Justice, days before his honorable exit had chosen to badly compromise his stature. The special court in its consequential decision on Musharraf was perhaps carried away by the unusual audacity displayed by the Chief Justice. It readily took the plunge after him. The special court, according to the attorney general had unfortunately acted rashly and in indecenthaste. A mortified Military stood deeply hurt,with wounded pride, andtarnished image. For the first time in history an ex-president and the Army Chief had been sentenced to death for high treason. The narrativebuilt by the ‘Special Court’ is clumsy and unconvincing. The Musharraf saga is well documented. In 1999, he was compelled to take over the country from a half-witted and whimsical Nawaz Sharif busy playingyet another childish trick on the Army. In 2007, he temporarily suspended the constitution again and clamped emergency to deal with what in his perception was a rebelling chief justice. On both the occasions the constitution had been temporarily suspended, not abrogated and restored the soonest possible. When Nawaz Sharif came back to take his turn in power as arranged with the PPP in the ‘Charter of Democracy’, he ordered Musharraf’s trial for treason in a clear act of personal vendetta.Sharif had not even cared to get his cabinet’s approval. The obliging Supreme Court had immediately constituted a special court to try Musharraf without bothering to scrutinize in detail the validity of Sharif’s request. Nowhere in the world an Epic court is expected to actas impetuously in cases of national import. The terms of reference were intriguingly tailormade to suit Sharif’s viciousness. Instead of taking cognizance of Musharraf’s 1999 affront, the court undertook to charge him for declaration of emergency in 2007 that had empoweredMusharraf to sack the then Chief Justice.It looks that the honorable court was not so much interested in the violation of the constitution in 1999, as to theclamping of emergency in 2007 that had clipped the wings of a troublesome Justice. Though the said Chief Justice was later restored, much to the regret of the following government, the “I” would not rest in peace unless Musharraf’s head was brought on a platter to serve as a warningto all the future rulers of Pakistan to stay clear of the judiciary. The salvo had been fired. The fire ignited. The Military became apprehensive for many reasons. The Chief had to call an urgent conference to help ease taut nerves. The commandoes live by a unique esprit de corps which an outsider can hardly ever imagine. The Army Chief alive to thissensitivity had to rush to the Commandoes Headquarters to sooth the agitated minds and calm the indignant souls. The spontaneous nationwide support must have come as a surprise to even the staunchest of Musharraf apologists. The court had indeed opened a pandora’s box of unlimited proportions. The Military has maintained its professional focus and composure and has refused to be dragged in silly assertions of self-importance. For a dwindling democracy to find steady legs to stand upon, all the institutions must strictly operate in their respective territories. As far Pakistan, let us not forget that “my enemy is my enemy, my friend’s enemy and my enemy’s friend”. Those whose actions please the enemies of Pakistan must decide for themselves where they stand. The writer has served Pakistan Army as Major General. His book “Pakistan in Search of a Messiah”)