The BISE Peshawar contract cancellation has caused a major controversy. The board ended its agreement with a private firm for printing answer sheets. The contract was originally signed in 2023 and extended twice, without revising prices. BISE chairman Khuda Bakhsh cited Rule 32(A)2 of KPPRA Rules, 2014, as the reason. He said the administrative department did not notify the required committee for contract review.
Earlier, BISE requested guidance from KPPRA regarding compliance for the second contract extension. KPPRA noted the board violated Rule 31(A)2 by skipping due process. However, it clarified that a lawfully signed contract does not automatically become invalid. BISE sought further legal advice, claiming contradictory responses from KPPRA. On November 27, the board decided to terminate the agreement.
READ MORE:BISE Lahore to announce intermediate results on september 18
Sources claimed BISE has had its own procurement cell since 2019. The board conducted internal committee approvals and market studies to ensure fair pricing. Critics argue the education department never set up a notified committee for procurement. They say BISE’s internal process should have been sufficient to validate the contract.
Earlier, BISE considered outsourcing printing to Islamabad but abandoned it after public backlash. The board also explored the government printing department, which required Rs70 million in investment. Officials noted that contracts are not voidable due to mistakes of law under Section 21 of the Contract Act. Many allege the cancellation shifts blame onto the firm unfairly.
READ MORE:BISE Lahore delays exams over India-Pakistan conflict fears
The BISE Peshawar contract cancellation continues to stir debate about transparency and accountability. Experts emphasize that the board’s internal oversight, not the firm, carries responsibility. The controversy highlights the need for clear rules and fair procedures in educational procurement.