KARACHI: The Sindh High Court has directed the police to obtain the mobile phone record of former president Asif Ali Zardari’s aide Ghulam Qadir Marri who is said to have been illegally confined by the law enforcement agencies. A two-judge bench, headed by Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, directed the interior secretary, home secretary, provincial chiefs of Rangers and police file their comments on the petition until April 20. Ismail Marri, the brother of missing man, filed the petition seeking directives for the law enforcement agencies to trace out his missing brother, his friend – Khan Muhammad Mangi and two servants – Mehboob Ali Khashkheli and Javed Rehman. Marri is one of Zardari’s three close aides who are said to have gone missing within a few days. Ashfaq Leghari – who worked for Omni Group and Nawab Leghari – former Sindh government adviser – had gone missing a few days ago. Advocate Shahab Sarki, the petitioner’s counsel, submitted that Marri, a PPP staunch supporter, was kidnapped on April 07 near Jamshoro when he was returning home from Naudero after attending the death anniversary of Zulifqar Ali Bhutto. Marri, who is also a businessman and owned a vast agricultural land, was traveling in his white land cruiser along with his friend, driver and another servant. The counsel said that the missing petitioner’s brother was in contact with his family members till late Friday evening. Later, they learned through a news channel that his brother had gone missing as his vehicle was found abandoned near Jamshoro power house, he added. Sarki submitted that Marri was suffering from multiple ailments, including cancer, diabetes, and high-blood pressure and having periodic medical check-ups. His confinement would have extremely detrimental effect on his health as he was also undergoing cyber knife therapy. “Marri was being victimized by the establishment due to his political affiliation,” the petitioner said while adding his brother was a law-abiding citizen and would be willing to cooperate with the law enforcement agencies with regard to any investigation according to law. If he is required in any case, he should be produced before a court of law, he argued. Abductee’s fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution were being violated. The petitioner pleaded the court to direct the respondent authorities to produce him in court and restrain them from taking any adverse action against him.