• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

By Diana Furchtgott-Roth

Mining taxpayers’ pockets for private-pension relief

Published on: September 12, 2016 7:00 PM

 

 

After eight years of the Obama administration’s antagonism toward mining, the industry and its workers clearly need some relief. The Miners Protection Act of 2015—sponsored by Sen. Joe Manchin (D., W.Va.) and co-sponsored by eight Republicans—would bail out the underfunded pension plan of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA). The bill has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee, and Chairman Orrin Hatch is likely to take it up later this month. While the legislation seems appealing at first glance, a closer look reveals that it’s no better than fool’s gold.

The bill would transfer $490 million in federal cash currently designated for mine reclamation to the UMWA’s pension coffers. However, the abandoned mines are not going away, and the law that authorizes the federal government to put these mines in order has not been repealed. Mr. Manchin simply wants to siphon off federal money, which belongs to all taxpayers, to private pensions.

During a speech on the Senate floor in July, the West Virginia Democrat argued that the government has an obligation to protect miners’ health and retirement funds. He suggested that the 1946 Krug-Lewis agreement between the federal government and the United Mine Workers of America “created the promise of health benefits and retirement security for our Nation’s miners.”

But Krug-Lewis, which was enacted after the government nationalized America’s mines, only covered the period when the federal government owned the mines—May 29, 1946, to June 30, 1947. On July 1, 1947, the mines reverted to the private economy, and miners’ compensation was regulated by an agreement between the union and the owners. Known as the National Bituminous Wage Agreement of 1947, this document does not obligate the federal government to pay for the UMWA pension plan.

Even if the federal government had an obligation to the union, Mr. Manchin’s bill is no more than a Band-Aid. The UMWA chose to negotiate bigger raises for miners instead of asking companies to fund fully the pension plan. The union is far more popular with its members when it brings back larger cash raises and leaves the pension plan unfunded than when it brings smaller raises and a fully funded pension plan. Rather than only rewarding bad behavior, real relief should require firms to reform their pensions.

UMWA knows how to fund a pension plan. Required filings with the Labor Department show that the pension plan for the officers of the UMWA—the president, vice presidents and treasurer—is solvent. Known as the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust Employees Pension Plan, at the end of 2014 the plan was overfunded by $4.8 million. Other mining pension plans are also fully funded, such as those operated by theHecla Mining Company in Idaho, the Usibelli Coal Mine in Alaska, and the Pinto Valley Mining Corporation in Arizona.

Pension problems are not limited to unionized miners’ pensions. Some nonunion pensions also have deficits. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s guarantee program for private multiemployer pension plans is at least $42.4 billion in the red. Data published last month by Pew Charitable Trusts indicate that “state-run retirement systems” faced a $934 billion shortfall in fiscal year 2014. If Congress bails out unionized miners’ pensions, others will no doubt come forward with equally valid claims. This likely won’t come as a surprise, but the Senate co-sponsors of the UMWA bailout bill have all received significant campaign contributions from coal-mining firms over their political careers, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The top four are:Shelley Moore Capito (R., W.Va.), $600,544; Joe Manchin, $497,248; Rob Portman(R., Ohio), $186,685; and Richard Burr (R., N.C.), $93,726.

Sens. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.) and Jim Risch (R., Idaho) both have high ratings of “7” from the Club for Growth, a testament to their fiscal conservatism. Their decisions to co-sponsor are especially surprising, even if Mr. Cotton has received $76,850 and Mr. Risch $32,000 from coal-mining companies.

Through regulations on ozone, mercury, carbon, coal-mine dust, and crystalline silica, President Obama has proudly put all public coal companies, and many private ones, out of business. When coal mining goes out of business, so too do its pension plans. The best way for the next president to help is to end President Obama’s vendetta against the coal industry. Meanwhile, the UMWA needs to put its pension plan in order, without taxpayer cash, by raising contributions or reducing payouts. Sen. Manchin’s alternative, having the federal government bail out politically well-connected unions, would only reward poor stewardship and create negative incentives for the future. 

Filed Under: Business

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.