• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Faisal Sahi

100 lawyers attacked but disgraced the whole bar: CJ Athar Minallah

Published on: February 11, 2021 8:12 AM

Islamabad High Court Chief Justice Athar Minallah seems deeply disturbed by lawyers’ hooliganism at the court premises earlier this week over demolition of their illegally built chambers by the Capital Development Authority.

“When the group of lawyers entered the Islamabad High Court, I came out. When I reached the door, the lawyers broke down the door. When police came to protect me, I told police to go back. I was held hostage for over three hours but I remained firm,” Chief Justice Athar Minallah said during hearing of a case. “I was asked to move to a safer place. Instead of leaving the premises, I faced three-and-a-half-hours siege,” he further said.

On this occasion, senior lawyers present in the court said that they were ashamed of the attack on the Islamabad High Court. The IHC chief justice said that no one including him was above the law, adding that the law will take its own course. “This attack was not on me but on judiciary and the institution. Attack on Islamabad High Court is humiliation of 90 martyrs of the lawyers’ movement,” he added.

He said attack on the court is an action by only five percent of the lawyers, but 95 percent are professional people. “Only 100 lawyers attacked from 6,000 bar members but whole community has been disgraced,” he said. “This state of affairs should be looked into … lawyers have to take care of their dignity themselves … 95% of lawyers can bring a big change,” he remarked. “I could have taken action. But if I had taken action, I would have to do so against my own lawyers,” he remarked, adding that he always prefers relevant authorities to resolve issues.

On one occasion, senior lawyer Mian Abdul Rauf assured the court that such incident will not happen again. The IHC chief justice replied that it can only be guaranteed if those responsible for the incident are exemplified. “This court expects the bar council to take action against those involved in the incident … no compromise should be made on such incidents,” he added.

“We should also see who used a few lawyers for the purpose,” Mian Abdul Rauf said. The chief justice responded that they should not give an impression that there was a conspiracy behind the incident. “Everyone was a familiar face …. how can it be claimed that someone else was behind the attack?” he questioned. “They were all our people,” the chief justice further said. “Remember one thing: history is never written wrong,” he remarked, adding that in last seven years, he never supported any illegal action. “I can never expect these people to attack me. You don’t know who was leading it? What was the fault of these flowerpots? Why were the glasses broken, where are we headed to? Quaid-e-Azam got this Pakistan because of his professional conduct,” he remarked.

Meanwhile, the contempt of court case against those who attacked the Islamabad High Court premises has been fixed for hearing and a reply has been sought from 29 lawyers involved in the case within seven days. A notice issued by the Registrar’s Office has directed the lawyers to appear before the court in person on February 18. The court has also issued notices to all other parties in the case for February 18.

The ongoing protest by lawyers is not only affecting routine cases but also some high-profile cases. Accountability court judge Muhammad Bashir on Wednesday adjourned hearing in a case of income beyond known sources of income against former finance minister Ishaq Dar. The case was adjourned till February 24 without hearing due to strike by the lawyers.

Filed Under: Pakistan, Top Stories

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.