Since Narendar Modi, the leader of the ruling BJP, became the Indian prime minister in 2014, he started implementing ideology of Hindutva ((Hindu Nationalism). Under his regime, persecution of religious minorities, such as Dalits, Sikhs, Christians and particularly Muslims, might be cited as instances of Hindu nationalism enforcement. In this regard, the Indian Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 (CAA), passed by the Indian Parliament has further exposed the discriminatory policies of the Modi government. The CAA coupled with the National Register of Citizens (NRC) is mainly against the Muslim immigrants especially from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. Since December 15, 2019, daily mass protests, even by the moderate Hindus have been taking place across every state in India against the CAA and the NRC, which resulted in killing of more than 100 persons and injuring 800, mostly Muslims, by the police and fanatic Hindus. But, theModi-led regime has not withdrawn the CAA/NRC. Despite the passage of eight months, the Indian extremist government has continued lockdown in the India-held Kashmir (IHK). While, Indian fanatic rulers are also escalating tensions with Pakistan to divert attention from the drastic situation of the IHK, and have continued shelling inside Pakistani side of Kashmir by violating the ceasefire agreement in relation to the Line of Control (LoC). Indian forces have broken all previous records of gross human rights abuses since August 5, 2019 when Modi’s government ended special status of the held Jummu and Kashmir by abolishing articles 35A and 370 of the Indian Constitution to turn the Muslim majority into minority. Implementing the August 5 announcement, Indian central government issued a notorious map on October 31, 2019. In accordance with it, Jammu and Kashmir was bifurcated into two union territories-Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Besides Pakistan, China also rejected the Indian map. In this regard, China objected to the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories as “unlawful and void”, saying that India’s decision to “include” some of China’s territory into its administrative jurisdiction “challenged” Beijing’s sovereignty. Border dispute between New Delhi and China, which remains unsettled, has increased tension between the two countries. Former Soviet Union which had subjugated the minorities and ethnic groups in various regions through its military, disintegrated in 1991. Learning no lesson from its once close friend, New Delhi has been acting upon the similar policies in some way or the other. However, India, dominated by politicians from the Hindi heartland-Hindutva have been using brutal force ruthlessly against any move to free Assam, Kashmir, Khalistan, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tamil Nadu and Tripura where wars of liberation continue in one form or the other. Due to discrimination, Sikhs have been fighting for Kahalistan as an independent state. Former Indian minister of external affairs Jaswant Singh who served the BJP for 30 years was expelled from the party for praising Mohammad Ali Jinnah [Founder of Pakistan] and echoing the pain of the Indian Muslims in his book, “Jinnah: India, Partition, Independence” In the recent years, Maoist intensified their struggle by attacking official installments. In this context, Indian media admitted that Maoists have entered the cities, expanding their activities against the Indian union. On 22-23 April 2018, at least 39 Maoists were killed in an alleged encounter with Indian security forces in district Gadchiroli. Maoist uprising is second major freedom movement after that of the Occupied Kashmir. Indian former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh called Maoist insurrection “the single biggest internal-security challenge”, whereas, Home Secretary GK Pillai reiterated the magnitude of this threat by saying that the Maoists wanted to completely overthrow the Indian state by 2050. The Naxalite-Maoists, as they call themselves, are the liberators, representing landless farmers and the downtrodden masses who have been entangled into vicious circle of poverty, misery and deprivation. Tamil Nadu is another area where separatist movements are haunting federation of India. And, the seven states of Northeastern India, which are called the ‘Seven Sisters’ are ethnically and linguistically different from rest of the country. These states are rocked by a large number of armed and violent rebellions, some seeking separate states, some fighting for autonomy and others demanding complete independence. These states which include Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura, accuse New Delhi of apathy towards their issues. Illiteracy, poverty and lack of economic opportunities have fueled the natives’ demand for autonomy and independence. As regards the state of Assam, the BJP-led alliance has been targeting the 4 million Assamese Muslims who are being denied Indian citizenship under the NRC. On August 31, 2019, nearly two million people have been excluded from a list of citizens in India’s Assam, raising fears they could be rendered stateless. Undoubtedly, these states have witnessed various sorts of India’s state terrorism, but, did not stop their struggle. Instead of redressing the grievances of the people by eliminating injustices against them, Modi-led Indian regime is depending upon ruthless force to crush these extremist and secessionist movements. Therefore, India’s unrealistic counterinsurgency strategy has badly failed. Former Indian minister of external affairs Jaswant Singh who served the BJP for 30 years was expelled from the party for praising Mohammad Ali Jinnah [Founder of Pakistan] and echoing the pain of the Indian Muslims in his book, “Jinnah: India, Partition, Independence”. Pointing out the BJP’s attitude towards the minorities, Singh wrote: “Every Muslim that lives in India is a loyal Indian…look into the eyes of Indian Muslims and see the pain.” He warned in his book, if such a policy continued, “India could have a third partition.” Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book “US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations”