• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

By Syed Sabeeh

SC forms committee to examine reports in Orange Train project case

Published on: October 15, 2016 3:32 AM

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has constituted a two-member commission of technical experts for re-verification of reports pertaining to environmental assessment keeping in view the impact on heritage sites after the completion of Orange Line Metro Train (OLMT) project in Lahore costing Rs 45 billion.

They said the commission is comprised of international experts on technical modalities and preservation of heritage. “After considering the background of the controversy involved in the present proceedings, we deem it appropriate to appoint M/s TYPSA-Asian Consulting Engineers (Pvt.) Ltd and Professor Robin Coningham, Professor in the Department of Archeology, UNESCO, as commission of technical experts for re-verification of credibility of the NESPAK Reports dated July 2015 and February 2016 relied upon by the appellant (Punjab government), in the context of the Antiquities Act 1975 and Punjab Special Premises (Preservation) Ordinance 1985,” the top court ruled.

They said the commission would re-verify the environmental assessment reports separately prepared by the National Engineering Services Pakistan Ltd (NESPAK) and the Advisory Committee on the OLMT project. The heritage sites include the Supreme Court’s Lahore registry, St Andrew’s Presbyterian Church and Baba Mauj Darya Bukhari’s shrine, Shalimar Garden, Gulabi Bagh Gateway, Buddhu ka Awa, Chauburji, Zebunnisa’s Tomb, Lakshmi Building, General Post Office, and Aiwan-i-Auqaf.

A five-judge larger bench headed by Chief Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali on Friday resumed the hearing on appeals instituted by the Punjab government, Lahore Development Authority, the Punjab Mass Transit Authority and Nespak against the Lahore High Court’s, wherein the superior court had ordered to suspend the construction work within 200 feet of 11 heritage sites in Lahore.

Names of other consultants proposed by the provincial government including EA Consulting (Pvt) Ltd (previously worked with Lahore Development Authority), Osmani and Companies (Pvt) Ltd (previously worked with Punjab Mass-transit Authority), Moore Archeology and Environment Services and Wardell Armstrong Archeology have been dropped by the top court.

The commission, comprising international consultants, will be borne by the government of Punjab. “Their respective fee etc will be settled and paid by Government of Punjab,” the top court ruled. “We expect that the technical experts, so appointed, will expedite the proceedings of re-verification of reports in the above terms and will submit their report within 30 days,” the court said.

Expressing displeasure over the ‘wide of the mark’ coverage of top court’s proceedings by sections of the media, the chief justice observed that his remarks during the course of early hearing a day ago were misinterpreted. He observed that the media should exercise caution instead of creating sensationalism through their reporting in the media which distorted the actual facts.

Through a press statement issued from the office, the Supreme Court’s spokesperson clarified that the remarks attributed to chief justice during the hearing of Orange Line Train Project in sections of the media are concocted. The press statement stated that the news item gave the impression as if the chief justice of Pakistan was inciting people against the rulers of Pakistan, adding it is clarified that the news item was baseless and misleading.

“In fact, the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Pakistan had remarked, “people should carefully assess the situation and prudently use their right to vote while electing their representatives,” stated the press statement.

Filed Under: Islamabad

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Punjab braces for hotter weather as temperatures climb

Pakistan, Russia agree to boost cooperation against illegal immigration

US Senate approves $70 billion boost for immigration enforcement

Pakistan rejects India’s comments on Gilgit-Baltistan elections

US and Iran exchange strikes near Strait of Hormuz

Pakistan

Punjab braces for hotter weather as temperatures climb

Pakistan, Russia agree to boost cooperation against illegal immigration

Pakistan rejects India’s comments on Gilgit-Baltistan elections

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

US Senate approves $70 billion boost for immigration enforcement

US and Iran exchange strikes near Strait of Hormuz

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.