• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Staff Report

PbBC demands removal of Justice Qazi Faez Isa for ‘ridiculing’ army

Published on: April 22, 2019 2:06 AM

The Punjab Bar Council (PbBC) has demanded the removal of Supreme Court’s Justice Qazi Faez Isa for ‘criticising’ the armed forces as well as premier spy agency Inter-Services Intelligence in a verdict in Faizabad sit-in case.

“Justice Qazi Faez Isa rendered a judgment in the Faizabad dharna case in February 2019, in which the towering principles of law stand completely mutilated. The Federation of Pakistan is justified in filing an application for review against the judgment, in which without any evidence, factual basis or determination, Justice Qazi Faez Isa has ridiculed the armed forces and has carted serious aspersions on the intelligence agencies implying them to be rogue agencies thus strengthening the narrative of RAW, India, and our enemies,” a resolution passed by the executive committee of the Punjab Bar Council read.

“Pakistan Army and intelligence agencies are fighting war of country’s survival on multiple fronts. Instead of appreciating the armed forces and the intelligence agencies, Justice Qazi Faez Isa has ridiculed them,” it continued. “Therefore, we demand that appropriate proceedings against Justice Qazi Faez Isa may be initiated under Article 209(5) of the constitution for his removal as a judge of the Supreme Court,” it demanded.

The council maintained that all the organs of the state must exercise powers within the four corners and ambit prescribed by the law and the constitution.

“Indeed, the armed forces need to act within the four comers of the constitution, but such restriction is also equally applicable to the members of the judiciary, who in their speeches and judgments are ought not to ridicule the constitutional institutions such as the armed forces, without any lawful justification and on surmise, conjecture and perceptions,” the resolution maintained.

Citing another case, the council said former Islamabad High Court judge Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui had transgressed the limits prescribed under the law, constitution and code of conduct meant for the superior judiciary when he in a speech targeted other members of the judiciary and personnel from the armed forces without substantiating the same with any concrete evidence. “The removal of Justice Shaukat Siddiqui by the Supreme Judicial Council is absolutely in order and despite the same not being open to any exception, the Karachi Bar Association has filed a petition assailing the opinion/decision of the Supreme Judicial Council, which the Punjab lawyers do not support, rather they reject the same,” the resolution asserted.

“All along, the bar councils, bar associations and lawyers have adversely criticised the dysfunctionality of the Supreme Judicial Council. Now, when the Supreme Judicial Council has taken an unexceptionable step to remove Justice Shaukat Siddiqui, the challenge against his removal before the apex court by the Karachi Bar Association and a few other lawyers is a total mystery,” the resolution read. “Rather, such a challenge is hardly conducive to the process of judicial accountability and is vital to instill the paradigms of transparency, justice and fair play in the administration of justice,” it concluded.

The resolution was signed by Executive Committee Chairman Iftikhar Ibrahim Qureshi and members Akram Khaksar, Ali Raza Kirmani, Munir Hussain Bhatti, Jamil Asghar Bhatti and Rafique Siyan.

Filed Under: Punjab Tagged With: Ali Raza Kirmani, Army, Iftikhar Ibrahim Qureshi and members Akram Khaksar, Islamabad High Court, Jamil Asghar Bhatti, Justice Qazi Faez Isa, Munir Hussain Bhatti, PbBC, Rafique Siyan, ridiculing, Supreme Court

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.