• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Staff Report

Talal Chaudhry submits names of 17 witnesses in his defence

Published on: May 24, 2018 3:08 AM

ISLAMABAD: State Minister for Interior Talal Chaudhry on Wednesday submitted a list of 17 witnesses in defence of his stance on contempt charges and requested the apex court to grant him a week’s time to produce them for recording their statements.

Besides a representative of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra), the list contains names of PML-N lawmakers and ministers among others. They are Senator Musaddiq Malik, Federal Minister for Information Mariyam Aurangzaib, MNA Syed Ashiq Hussain Kirmani, MNA Shahbaz Babar, MNA Nadeem Abbas, banker Hassan Aurangzeb Abbasi, Transporters’ Association president Israr Khan, Faisalabad Bar Association’s former president Ali Abbas Khan, Municipal Corporation of Jaranwala’s vice chairman Sheikh Habib, Raksha Association president Atta Muhammad, Municipal Corporation of Jaranwala members Imtiaz Khan, Abdul Sattar, Tanvir Hussain, and Qadir Qaisar.

A three-member Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Gulzar Ahmad, Justice Tariq Masood and Justice Faisal Arab heard the contempt of court notice against Talal Chaudhry on Wednesday.

During the hearing, Justice Gulzar Ahmad asked Kamran Murtaza, senior counsel for Talal, to present the witnesses by Thursday (today) so that the bench could conclude the case soon.

Kamran Murtaza contended that they had finalised the names on Tuesday and they now needed to approach the personnel to take their consent for the matter.

When he requested the court to summon witnesses on payment a process fee in the interest of justice, Justice Gulzar Ahmad questioned if the witnesses were going to present any new information. He asked, “Had Talal Chaudhry in his speeches not criticised the superior courts and the judges?”

The judge observed that the witnesses would say what Talal Chaudhry had said during the last hearing.

He asked Talal’s counsel to present his witnesses by Thursday, adding, “Otherwise we will close the evidence and fix the matter for arguments.” He also said that the bench would not be available in the next week.

Later, on repeated requests by Kamran Murtaza, the court issued a notice only to the representative of Pemra, Muhammad Tahir, to appear before the court on Thursday to record his statement. The Pemra representative was also asked to bring to the court the record of Talal’s speeches made on January 24 and 27, 2018.

Earlier on May 21, Talal Chaudhry had recorded his statement under Section 342 of Code of Criminal Procedure. He requested the court to withdraw the contempt charge against him and to not cast doubts on his intentions about the dignity of the court.

He stated that he faces no allegation of prejudice in any matter pending before the court. He further stated that he honestly believed that he had neither uttered anything nor acted in a manner which might be construed as causing obstruction of the process of the court in any way.

He contended that his January 24, 2018, press talk was edited with malafide intention and many of his sentences were removed from the actual substance to make it appear controversial. He stated that his January 27, 2018, speech was not against any of the judge. He contended that the video of his speech that was kept on record was also edited with malafide intention.

Talal Chaudhry was indicted on March 15, 2018, on contempt of court charges. Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar had taken suo motu notice over Talal’s alleged derogatory and contemptuous statements and speeches at PML-N public gatherings against the apex court.

Published in Daily Times, May 24th 2018.                        

Filed Under: Islamabad

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.