A new proposal by Iran and Oman to impose fees on commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz has sparked global concern during a temporary ceasefire between the United States and Iran.
Read More: Iran allows essential cargo ships through Strait of Hormuz
According to reports, the plan was discussed during ongoing diplomatic engagements linked to the two-week truce brokered with Pakistan’s support. Under the proposal, Iran and Oman would jointly collect taxes or transit fees from ships using the strategic waterway, with the aim of funding post-war reconstruction efforts.
View this post on Instagram
The Strait of Hormuz, located between Iran and Oman, is one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes. Historically, it has been treated as an international waterway where ships pass freely without taxation. The proposed move marks a significant shift and could redefine maritime norms.
Iranian officials indicated that the fees would vary depending on the type of vessel, cargo, and other operational factors. Tehran is reportedly seeking international acceptance of the plan as part of a broader and permanent peace agreement with Washington and its allies.
However, the proposal has drawn criticism from several countries and experts, who argue that imposing unilateral transit fees on a natural waterway could violate international law. Under existing legal frameworks, coastal states are generally allowed to charge only for specific services, such as pilotage or towing, rather than for mere passage.
Read More: Oman, Iran discuss smooth transit in Strait of Hormuz, Muscat says
US President Donald Trump has stressed that uninterrupted oil flow must remain a central component of any peace deal with Iran. Meanwhile, Gulf countries have expressed concern, warning that the route cannot be controlled or leveraged by any single state. Analysts say the plan could have far-reaching implications for global trade and energy markets if implemented.