• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

T.M. Awan

Why Pakistan Does Not Import Oil from Iran?

Published on: March 30, 2026 2:48 AM

March 30, 2026 by T.M. Awan

The question is increasingly being asked with urgency: why does Pakistan not import “cheaper” oil from Iran?

At first glance, the argument appears both logical and economically appealing. However, the reality is far more complex. Pakistan’s decision is shaped by a combination of economic constraints, diplomatic considerations, financial systems, and strategic priorities. The issue is not merely about price-it is about navigating a deeply interconnected global system. The most significant barrier remains U.S. and Western sanctions on Iran. While there have been brief and limited relaxations, these are temporary and uncertain. Entering into long-term energy agreements under such conditions would expose Pakistan to serious diplomatic and economic risks. Unlike larger economies such as China or, to some extent, Russia, Pakistan does not possess the economic resilience to withstand secondary sanctions. More importantly, Pakistan is integrated into the global financial system, particularly the SWIFT network, while Iran has largely been excluded from it. This creates a fundamental payment barrier-any attempt to conduct transactions could expose Pakistani banks to punitive actions.

Another key challenge lies in Pakistan’s domestic refining capacity. Much of Pakistan’s refining infrastructure is outdated and not fully compatible with Iranian crude oil grades. Similar issues have been observed with Russian oil.

If sanctions on Iran are lifted in the future, Pakistan should seriously consider expanding energy cooperation. This could include establishing refining capacity for Iranian crude and leveraging Gwadar’s deep-sea port for regional energy trade.

Additionally, the Iranian oil that enters Pakistan through informal channels is often unrefined and contains impurities. Experts warn that such fuel can damage engines and reduce efficiency, making it unsuitable for large-scale, regulated consumption. Pakistan already imports oil from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Qatar under highly favourable financial arrangements. These include deferred payment facilities, which significantly ease Pakistan’s balance of payments burden. For instance, Saudi Arabia has extended arrangements allowing Pakistan to import oil worth approximately $100 million per month on deferred payments. Such facilities are not currently available in Iran, which itself faces severe financial constraints. Beyond oil, Gulf countries provide critical financial support to Pakistan. Saudi Arabia has deposited around $2 billion in Pakistan’s accounts, while the UAE has contributed an additional $1 billion. These inflows help stabilise Pakistan’s currency and broader economy.

Diverting oil trade toward Iran at the expense of these relationships could jeopardise this financial backing-an outcome that would carry far greater economic consequences than the marginal savings from cheaper oil.

Another crucial factor is labour migration. Approximately 5 to 6 million Pakistanis are employed in Gulf countries, sending billions of dollars in remittances annually. These inflows are vital for maintaining Pakistan’s external account stability.

In contrast, Iran hosts a negligible Pakistani workforce. Therefore, the economic benefits derived from Gulf relations far outweigh any potential savings from Iranian oil imports. Pakistan’s commitments under the International Monetary Fund (IMF) program also limit its policy flexibility. Engaging in sanctioned trade with Iran could jeopardise IMF support. Similarly, Pakistan benefits from the European Union’s GSP+ status, which allows preferential access to European markets. Any violation of international sanctions regimes could risk these trade privileges, potentially resulting in losses amounting to billions of dollars.

Trade decisions are not always purely economic; they are often shaped by broader geopolitical realities. Pakistan’s relationships with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar extend far beyond energy-they encompass defence cooperation, financial assistance, and long-standing strategic alignment.

Historically, Pakistan has avoided deep strategic alignment with Iran, although future cooperation remains possible. For now, preserving existing partnerships serves Pakistan’s national interest more effectively.

Countries like China import significant volumes of Iranian oil through “shadow fleets”-unregistered tankers operating outside formal regulatory frameworks. These operations involve complex financial and logistical arrangements that Pakistan currently lacks the capacity to replicate.

Pakistan’s oil imports rely on regulated shipping channels, many of which involve international companies. Any attempt to engage in shadow trade would expose these entities to sanctions, making such an approach highly risky and impractical.

Moreover, Pakistan’s economy depends heavily on tax revenues from legal oil imports. Allowing large-scale smuggling would erode tax collection, increase fiscal deficits, and destabilise the economy.

Contrary to popular perception, Iranian oil is not dramatically cheaper. As a member of OPEC, Iran operates within global pricing structures. Estimates suggest that Iranian crude may be only $1 to $2.5 cheaper per barrel than market rates. Given Pakistan’s diversified import mix-sourcing oil from multiple countries-the overall savings from switching to Iranian oil would be marginal and unlikely to significantly impact domestic fuel prices.

It is important to note that Pakistan does import a limited amount of Iranian oil, primarily through informal channels, accounting for roughly 15 per cent of total consumption. If sanctions on Iran are lifted in the future, Pakistan should seriously consider expanding energy cooperation. This could include establishing refining capacity for Iranian crude and leveraging Gwadar’s deep-sea port for regional energy trade.

However, the most promising avenue lies in natural gas. The long-delayed Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline has the potential to transform Pakistan’s energy landscape, particularly for industrial growth in Balochistan and Sindh.

The writer is a journalist, strategic communication and public diplomacy advisor based in Islamabad.

Filed Under: Op-Ed Tagged With: Iran, oil

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

SBP reserves rise by $43 million

Gulf crisis drives India-Venezuela oil partnership

Security forces kill four terrorists in KP

Saudi delegation explores Pakistan investments

NEPRA cuts electricity tariff nationwide

Pakistan

Security forces kill four terrorists in KP

Saudi delegation explores Pakistan investments

NDMA warns of floods and landslides across Pakistan

Shehbaz prioritises export-led economic growth

Foreign Office denies US information sharing

More Posts from this Category

Business

Business leaders distrust upcoming FY27 budget

PM Shehbaz orders pilot of automated tax system

Pakistan to unveil budget on June 10

PM Shehbaz pushes tariff reforms, orders AI upgrade

Saudi Arabia backs Bahrain, urges united regional stability efforts

More Posts from this Category

World

Gulf crisis drives India-Venezuela oil partnership

Musk applauds Pakistan’s justice system

PM Shehbaz lauds strategic ties with Washington

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.