• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Agencies

FO rejects India’s ‘absurd’ remarks on Pakistan’s actions in Afghanistan

Published on: March 16, 2026 9:55 AM

The Foreign Office (FO) on Sunday rejected a statement made by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs criticising Pakistan’s cross-border action in Afghanistan, stating that the statement was “absurd, unwarranted” and “shamefully hypocritical”.

The development comes as Pakistan continues with Operation Ghazab lil-Haq, which was launched in late February following unprovoked firing by the Afghan Taliban from across the border.

A day earlier, the Indian MEA’s spokesperson Shri Randhir Jaisal claimed that Pakistan’s strikes in Afghanistan had led to “death of several civilians”, terming it an “act of aggression”.

In response, the FO spokesperson Tahir Andrabi rejected the claim, stating that the remarks against Pakistan’s “legitimate, targeted and precise actions against terrorist hideouts and support bases inside Afghanistan are not only absurd and unwarranted but also shamefully hypocritical”.

The spokesperson maintained that India’s “active support and sponsorship” for terrorist groups operating from Afghan soil – Fitna-al-Khawarij and Fitna-al-Hindustan – remained “well-known”.

Fitna al Khawarij is a term the state uses for terrorists belonging to the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan, while Fitna al Hindustan is a term designated by the state for terrorist organisations in Balochistan.

Under the above circumstances, he held that India’s “frustration at the destruction of its terrorist franchise in Afghanistan, as reflected in such statements, is quite understandable”.

“India, a serial violator of human rights and international law, continues to illegally occupy Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir in violation of the United Nations Charter and relevant UN Security Council resolutions, and has been responsible for perpetrating state terrorism in the occupied territory,” the statement read.

Andrabi maintained that under its “Hindutva extremist ideology,” India continued to “systematically marginalise its minorities, spread Islamophobia, and has even weaponised water in contravention of its treaty obligations”.

“India has not only played the role of a spoiler in Afghanistan, but also in the entire region,” the FO added.

The statement stressed that India was in “no position” to make statements such as the recent one, given its “shameful credentials”.

Andrabi urged the neighbouring country to “instead focus on refraining from stoking terrorism inside Pakistan from Afghan soil”.

“For its part, Pakistan remains determined to take all appropriate actions in self-defence and to protect its citizens in accordance with international law, including the UN Charter,” the statement concluded.

On March 10, during a heated debate on Afghanistan at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), Pakistan lambasted India’s criticism of cross-border strikes, accusing Delhi of complicity in the terror threat at the western border.

Pakistan’s Permanent Representative Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad termed India’s remarks as “no surprise”, given India’s “animosity towards Pakistan and the sole objective of its Afghan policy being to destabilise Pakistan”.

He accused India of “actively supporting and sponsoring terrorist groups operating from Afghan soil, such as the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan and Baloch Liberation Army”.

In October last year, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif had stated that India was waging a “low-intensity” war against Pakistan from Afghanistan, adding that New Delhi is trying to “settle the score” after facing defeat in the four-day conflict with Islamabad in May, 2025.

Filed Under: Pakistan Tagged With: Afghanistan, Foreign office, Pakistan

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.