• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

APP

Top private schools face CCP action

Published on: November 22, 2025 2:13 AM

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has issued show cause notices to seventeen major private school systems for allegedly abusing their dominant position by compelling parents to purchase expensive, logo-branded notebooks, workbooks, and uniforms exclusively from school-authorized vendors.

The action has been taken to safeguard millions of school-going children and their families from unfair pricing practices, said a release issued here on Friday.

The enforcement action follows a detailed suo motu inquiry initiated on the basis of numerous complaints from parents, guardians, and other stakeholders. Complainants alleged arbitrary fee hikes, non-transparent selling practices, and the bundling of mandatory branded school supplies, effectively leaving families with no choice but to purchase these items at inflated prices.

The school systems under scrutiny include: Beaconhouse School System, The City School, Headstart, Lahore Grammar School (LGS), Froebel’s, Roots International, Roots Millennium, KIPS, Allied Schools, Super Nova, Dar-e-Arqam, STEP School, Westminster International, United Charter School, and The Smart School, among others.

These school networks operate hundreds of campuses nationwide and collectively educate millions of students, giving them considerable influence over enrolled families.

The CCP’s inquiry revealed that parents were mandated to buy logo-bearing notebooks, workbooks, uniforms, and other ancillary school products from exclusive school-authorized outlets. In several instances, schools sold compulsory “study packs” through online portals or designated vendors, with students prohibited from using generic notebooks or uniforms from the open market.

The CCP defined the relevant markets as the provision of education services to enrolled students, where each school enjoyed a 100% market share, making students “captive consumers”; and

The market for ancillary school products which became the “tied market.”

The inquiry report concluded that many study packs were up to 280% more expensive than similar items available in open markets.

Leading school systems engaged in tying arrangements, making continued enrollment conditional upon purchasing secondary products such as notebooks and uniforms. Schools appointed exclusive vendors, foreclosing the market for thousands of small stationery and uniform sellers nationwide.

Mandatory branded supplies and restrictive trading conditions violated Sections 4(1) and 4(2)(a) of the Competition Act, 2010 high switching costs, such as limited school options, substantial transfer fees, and transportation constraints left parents with no viable alternative, enabling schools to enforce these practices without resistance.

The CCP observed that these practices restricted market access, harmed small retailers, and limited consumer choice across Pakistan.

Private educational institutions account for nearly half of all student enrollment in the country.

With inflation already straining household budgets, the imposition of overpriced branded materials further burdens families and raises concerns about excessive commercialization within the education sector.

CCP has directed the seventeen school systems to submit written responses within fourteen (14) days, appear before the Commission through duly authorized representatives, and explain why enforcement orders under Section 31 and penalties under Section 38 should not be imposed. Failure to comply may result in ex parte proceedings. Under the law, CCP may impose a penalty of up to 10% of the annual turnover or PKR 750 million, whichever is higher, for such violations.

Filed Under: Pakistan Tagged With: action, Competition Commission of Pakistan, Face, private schools, Top

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

NDMA warns of floods and landslides across Pakistan

Musk applauds Pakistan’s justice system

Pakistan clinches ODI series against Australia

Shehbaz prioritises export-led economic growth

PM Shehbaz lauds strategic ties with Washington

Pakistan

NDMA warns of floods and landslides across Pakistan

Shehbaz prioritises export-led economic growth

Foreign Office denies US information sharing

Security forces kill four terrorists in KP

Barrister Gohar warns against sidelining PTI

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP reserves rise by $43 million

Business leaders distrust upcoming FY27 budget

PM Shehbaz orders pilot of automated tax system

Pakistan to unveil budget on June 10

PM Shehbaz pushes tariff reforms, orders AI upgrade

More Posts from this Category

World

Musk applauds Pakistan’s justice system

PM Shehbaz lauds strategic ties with Washington

Gulf crisis drives India-Venezuela oil partnership

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.