• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Supreme court reserves verdict on PTI reserved seats case — ruling expected shortly

Published on: June 27, 2025 5:41 PM

ISLAMABAD – The Supreme Court of Pakistan has reserved its verdict on petitions challenging the ruling over reserved seats. The decision is expected to be announced shortly. The case involves the eligibility of the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC), backed by PTI, to claim women and minority seats in assemblies.

The 13-member full court began hearing the case earlier today. However, the bench was reduced to 12 after Justice Salahuddin Panhwar recused himself. He stepped down after PTI’s counsel Hamid Khan questioned the inclusion of judges who joined the Supreme Court after the 26th Constitutional Amendment.

This sparked tense exchanges between the bench and the PTI lawyer. Justice Jamal Mandokhail criticized Khan’s conduct, warning him against making baseless objections. He reminded Khan that if he opposed the amendment, he must also accept its consequences or refrain from legal practice. The judges maintained that transparency and public trust in the judiciary must be upheld.

The court questioned whether SIC or any independent candidates had officially requested reserved seats after joining the party. The justices noted that no such formal request had been filed with the Election Commission, High Court, or the Supreme Court. Justice Mandokhail remarked that 13 judges had previously agreed that SIC had no right to reserved seats, accusing the petitioners of misleading the nation.

Previously, the Supreme Court had issued notices in May to hear review petitions after Peshawar High Court and ECP denied SIC’s claim to reserved seats. The ECP argued that SIC failed to submit party lists in time. Reserved seats were then redistributed to other parties, including PML-N, PPP, MQM, and JUI-F. PTI challenged this decision in the Supreme Court, calling it unconstitutional.

 

Filed Under: Pakistan Tagged With: Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Latest, PTI, reserved its verdict on petitions, Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC), Supreme Court of Pakistan, the ruling over reserved seats

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.