• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

SIC challenges new bench in reserved seats case, demands transparency

Published on: May 16, 2025 5:58 PM

The Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC) has filed three miscellaneous petitions in the Supreme Court, challenging the bench assigned to hear the reserved seats case. The petitions, submitted on May 16, 2025, raise several concerns, including the composition of the current bench and the absence of live broadcasting for the proceedings.

One of the petitions argues that the review of the case should be heard by the same bench that delivered the original ruling, in line with established legal principles. The SIC contends that forming a new bench to review the case contradicts Supreme Court rules, as it creates confusion between a review and an appeal process.

Additionally, the SIC has raised questions about the removal of two judges from the original bench, questioning the legitimacy of the new bench. The petition specifically asks, “How can 11 judges review the decision of a 13-member constitutional bench?” in reference to the original bench’s composition.

The SIC has also requested that the review of reserved seats be postponed until the status of the 26th Constitutional Amendment is resolved. The case concerning the 26th Amendment is still pending, and the SIC argues that the review hearing should not proceed until this issue is clarified.

In a final plea, the SIC calls for the reconstitution of the original bench and the live broadcast of proceedings to ensure transparency throughout the case. The petition highlights the need for the public to have access to the hearings, given the importance of the case.

Filed Under: Pakistan Tagged With: filed three miscellaneous petitions, reserved seats case, Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC), Supreme Court

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Saudi delegation explores Pakistan investments

NEPRA cuts electricity tariff nationwide

NDMA warns of floods and landslides across Pakistan

Musk applauds Pakistan’s justice system

Pakistan clinches ODI series against Australia

Pakistan

Saudi delegation explores Pakistan investments

NDMA warns of floods and landslides across Pakistan

Shehbaz prioritises export-led economic growth

Foreign Office denies US information sharing

Security forces kill four terrorists in KP

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP reserves rise by $43 million

Business leaders distrust upcoming FY27 budget

PM Shehbaz orders pilot of automated tax system

Pakistan to unveil budget on June 10

PM Shehbaz pushes tariff reforms, orders AI upgrade

More Posts from this Category

World

Musk applauds Pakistan’s justice system

PM Shehbaz lauds strategic ties with Washington

Gulf crisis drives India-Venezuela oil partnership

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.