• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

By Muhammad Faisal Kaleem

‘Nawaz ousted by disputed facts’

Published on: July 29, 2017 8:15 PM

 

ISLAMABAD: While expressing reservations over the Supreme Court’s verdict in Panama Papers case, the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) on Friday said an elected prime minister has been ousted on the basis of ‘disputed facts’.

“Supreme Court’s decision has been bifurcated into two parts. First part is about Panama Papers but the judges didn’t touch it but have asked NAB to file references instead. Removal of prime minister is not on the basis of Panama Papers,” said Khawaja Saad Rafique at a joint press conference along with Barrister Zafarullah, Ahsan Iqbal, Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and Zahid Hamid.

He said that an elected prime minister has been disqualified over allegations revolving around Rs 0.2 million only. “After allegations of billions of rupees corruption, he was disqualified over Rs 0.2 million only”, he said, adding that it was also surprising that court’s decision was not in as per the petition filed.

He said it was also regretful that the same judges had given the verdict against Nawaz Sharif who also oversaw proceeding of the joint investigation team (JIT).

“We’ll go to the people’s court and nobody can stop us from that. We have asked our supporters to stay peaceful as we will not allow anyone to disparage the integrity of the institutions,” he said.

“The court has cited a letter by a UAE-based company owned by prime minister’s son as reason for his disqualification. The company had chosen Nawaz as its director which is a ceremonial post and whose AED 10,000 salary was payable to him, which he never received,” Zahid Hamid told reporters.

“All allegations against Nawaz Sharif proved wrong but he was disqualified over a single undeclared asset. It seems unbelievable as it does not cause any change in the wealth statement of Nawaz Sharif,” Ahsan Iqbal said.

He said that PML-N wants supremacy of the constitution in the country. “We have mandate of billions of people and will complete our five-year term without any compromise,” he said, further alleging that Nawaz and the PML-N have been punished for making China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) a success.

Iqbal encouraged the supporters and party workers, saying, “Supporters of PML-N should be proud of their leader as no one has undergone as much scrutiny as Nawaz Sharif did and yet nothing was proven against him except that he could have received money from his son but he did not,” he said.

Claiming that the apex court didn’t find corruption or embezzlement of even a single rupee against the prime minister, Barrister Zafarullah said the allegations, which were put forward by the petitioner, were not found eligible by the Supreme Court. “We have not seen in the human history that WhatsApp was used as evidence.”

Disparaging Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), he said it could not gather attention through month-long sit-in and lockdown of the capital and, consequently, relied on Panama Papers. “The report is entirely based on soft record. All documents are photocopies. Justice hasn’t been served as per our understanding of the legislation,” he said.

While calling Imran as ‘pawn’, the PML-N leader said that PTI chief was using such tactics as he is playing in the hands of someone else and trying to derail an elected government.

Shahid Khaqan Abbassi said his party respected the verdict but it was their right to reveal facts for the knowledge of the general public. He said the prime minister was disqualified because he did not take any money from his son. “History will not accept this verdict. We want to put this before people that no allegation of corruption has been proved against Nawaz Sharif.”

 

 

Published in Daily Times, July 29th , 2017.

Filed Under: Pakistan

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.