• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Sunday, July 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Harlan Ullman

Harlan Ullman

<em>Dr Harlan Ullman is Chairman of two private companies; senior adviser at the Atlantic Council; and Distinguished Senior Fellow and Visiting Professor at the US Naval War College in Newport Rhode Island.  He can be reached @harlankullman on Twitter.</em>

America’s Five Worst Strategic Blunders

Published on: November 6, 2023 1:42 AM

November 6, 2023 by Harlan Ullman

With wars raging in Ukraine and Israel, escalation and disaster loom, probably more so than at any time during the last decade. The Biden administration, so far, has been competent and sensible in responding to the war in the Middle East. However, Hezbollah and Iran continue to provoke Israel; attack US forces in Syria and Iraq; and could intervene on the side of Hamas.

In these circumstances, any decision the administration takes is laden with danger. Hence, examining the worst strategic blunders the US has made over the past two decades could well inform the White House on how to avoid future disaster. Five of the worst blunders have been arbitrarily chosen although readers may have other nominees.

George W. Bush was responsible for numbers one and three blunders; Barack Obama for number two; and Donald Trump for four and five. Given the many blunders America has made since the new century dawned, competition for selection was keen.

The attacks of September 11th stunned and infuriated the country. George Bush had no option except to respond decisively. US forces were initially deployed into Afghanistan to neutralize al Qaeda and kill or capture Osama bin Laden. The administration then embarked on the “Freedom Agenda,” using the specter of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) as the rationale for invading Iraq. The assumption was that by imposing democracy in Iraq, “the geostrategic framework of the Middle East would be forever altered.” It did change, but for the worse.

The Biden administration confronts a five-front war.

Nation-building was a disaster in Afghanistan. Democracy was impossible to impose on a tribal society. Similarly, the 2003 Iraq invasion provoked an insurgency that still lingers. Consequently, the combination of the decisions made after 9/11 that led to the interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq was the worst foreign policy blunder of this century and possibly much of the past one by bringing seemingly permanent turmoil to the Middle East with no respite in sight.

Number three, made by Bush ’43, was abrogating the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) of 1972. Bush entered office determined to improve missile defense. The ABM Treaty was a limitation. With its abrogation, US and Russian relations were dealt what turned out to be the first fatal blow beginning an irreversible, steady disintegration. And September 11th intervened.

Barack Obama was chastised for declaring “red lines” on Syrian President Bashar al Assad that were not enforced. However, the second biggest US foreign policy blunder was ordering a “strategic pivot” to Asia. Allies in Europe and NATO were surprised and shocked. In the Pacific, allies were terrified about the “pivot” making China an enemy. And that is what happened, guaranteed by Obama’s National Security Strategy.

The military component of the strategy could not have been clearer. The aims were to deter and if war came defeat China along with four other potential adversaries. How could China not assume it had become an American enemy, laying the predicate for the hostility that now defines the US-China relationship?

Donald Trump committed strategic blunders four and five. Number four was cancellation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran. If honored by both sides, Iran would never, repeat never, obtain a nuclear weapon. Some might argue that this blunder could have been numbers two or three.

Iran could cheat. That was unlikely because of the intimate presence of the International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors and the installed surveillance system. But if Iran cheated, the treaty was useless. Withdrawal from the JCPOA has left no restraint on Iran producing nuclear weapons.

Number five was the imposition of tariffs on the imports of Chinese goods. A huge imbalance in the current account of goods and services favored China. Trump saw the trade imbalance as intolerable.

But the capital account was in America’s favor by hundreds of billions of dollars because of China’s investments here. This was not only wrong headed economic policy. US consumers bore the extra costs imposed by the tariffs. And the tariffs were further nails in the coffin of US-Chinese relations.

The Biden administration confronts a five-front war. Bullets are only flying in two-Ukraine and Gaza. The other two fronts are China, Russia. The most threatening could be here at home in the USA. The dangers are self-evident.

Because of this record of foreign policy blunders, exacerbated by a failing dysfunctional government here, the actions of an eighty-one year old president will be closely monitored and have enormous impact abroad and domestically as well. And they may well determine the outcome of the 2024 election.

He writer is a senior advisor at Washington, DC’s Atlantic Council and a published author.

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Khamenei funeral continues in Tehran amid revenge vows

Pakistan and Türkiye’s trade ties enter new phase aiming $5 billion target

PAF jets escorted Iran diplomats after US warned of Israeli hit list: NY Times

Chinks in TTP ranks laid bare as Jamaatul Ahrar splits again

IHC seeks report on Imran, Bushra’s ‘solitary confinement’

Pakistan

Khamenei funeral continues in Tehran amid revenge vows

Pakistan and Türkiye’s trade ties enter new phase aiming $5 billion target

PAF jets escorted Iran diplomats after US warned of Israeli hit list: NY Times

Chinks in TTP ranks laid bare as Jamaatul Ahrar splits again

IHC seeks report on Imran, Bushra’s ‘solitary confinement’

More Posts from this Category

Business

Pakistan Banking Summit 2026 to Drive Dialogue on the Future of Pakistan’s Financial Sector

UK, Italy, Japan sign $6.1bn pact

Gold prices decline in Pakistan as global rates ease

Petrol, diesel prices cut by Rs1.97 per litre

Salaried workers pay more tax than exporters and property sellers

More Posts from this Category

World

Morocco crush Canada to reach World Cup quarter-finals

US turns 250 as Trump warns of ‘attack’ on American identity

Modi Seychelles award

AI-Generated Award Errors Spark Criticism During Modi’s Seychelles Visit

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}