• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Kaleem Butt

Sindh is not a piece of cake

Published on: June 22, 2013 7:00 PM

June 22, 2013 by Kaleem Butt

Everyone had great
expectations from the May 11, 2013 general elections, and thank God Almighty the cup passed over our heads, but it is very sad to say that no change came in Sindh. Same old corrupt faces returned joyfully singing ‘Hojamaloo’ and dancing to the beat of drums. We were told a great change would come and the country would be changed. But has anything changed? As far as Sindh is concerned the answer is a big no. From media reports of a few days it seems quite clear that the PPP even after having a clear mandate in Sindh is desperate to take MQM back in government. One does not know why; it seems that they are inspired by the dynamic leadership of the MQM or by its politics of aggression. But that happens when you place an 80-year-old man without skills, capability and ability to handle pressure.

Now the unfinished deals of Zulfiqarabad, the port of Manora and the controversial local bodies government system would be fulfilled. The MQM would definitely get its due share. It is another historic fact that the PPP representing a majority of Sindh has, again and again, betrayed this land of great history expanding now to 6,000 years of its glorious past. It has faced many disasters, and witnessed many groups of people, and whoever wants to ruin it just to take control of its bounties and natural resources.

Nowadays, another big news regarding Sindh creeping into popular as well as social media is that ‘Mohajir Suba Tehreek’ has come back to life again as soon as the MQM sat on the opposition benches in the Sindh Assembly. It seems true that once you have tasted power, you become eager to have it again by hook or by crook. We can easily witness that eagerness building up amongst the popular leadership of the MQM. The media is aware of the hostile language used by Altaf Hussian aka Bhai through his telephonic speeches. Then it was seen that a worker stood up and slapped members of the Rabita Committee; all this shows how badly the MQM wants to be in power. And for that they have moved their best pawn, ‘the movement for a separate province for mohajirs (refugees)’ by dividing Sindh. The leaders of this movement quite openly announce in public: “Sindh is not a holy cow that it cannot be divided.”

Salim Hyder, a leader of the Mohajir Suba Tehreek, said in a press conference that Karachi is a city that belongs to mohajirs, and no one could stop them from making it a mohajir province.

Though the leaders of this movement often deny the support of the MQM, but actions speak louder than words. It was the MQM who wanted to move a bill in the last National Assembly for a Seraiki province; they openly support Baba Hazara who demands a separate province. The only reason the MQM supports them is so that they in return would support them and their sleeping partners to gain a separate province for Urdu-speakers.

This is not a new thing for Sindhis; from the recent short history of Pakistan we know that such bad times have come upon Sindh repeatedly. We see deep roots of this conspiracy from the late 1960s and early 1970s. As Mansoor Qadir Junejo in his book The Jinnahpur Conspiracy Case writes, in 1996, when Ms Benazir Bhutto returned from her tour of Europe, she declared some astonishing facts regarding the division of Sindh. It was disclosed to her that Karachi would be made a free port like Hong Kong and Singapore. Qadir mentions the Mohajiristan Liberation Organisation, which published a leaflet including a map of ‘Jinnahpur’. It was further mentioned in that leaflet that if dividing Sindh and establishing ‘Mohajiristan’ is treason, then dividing India and establishing Pakistan was a greater treason, and it was the Sindh Assembly that first passed that resolution.

Jami Chandio in his article, “The Question of Understanding MQM’s Politics” writes that according to him there are two major reasons for the formation of the MQM. He claims that migration was never in the pact of the partition, and excluding Mr Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the mainstream leadership of the Muslim League was Urdu-speaking, coming from UP and CP. They had their own vested interests in the newly-born country. Another point that Mr Chandio mentions is seeing the unity, struggle and resistance of Sindhis, the establishment in 1983 used its tools and laid the foundations of the MQM to divert the people of Sindh. And thus Sindhis started a new struggle to protect the boundaries of their motherland, which seemed to be in danger.

Dr Israr Ahmed, one of the greatest religious scholars of Pakistan, holds international stakeholders responsible for breaking up Pakistan, with a few local hands helping them. Dr Ahmed in his booklet Dangers to Pakistan’s Existence writes, “In a book by the name The Twin Eras of Pakistan published in 1992 in New York, our political and military history is discussed. The intellectuals and political pundits in the west predict that Pakistan would be divided into eight parts; four amongst them would be independent states, and three would purely come out from Pakistan. According to them these three independent states include: Republic of Balochistan, including the whole of Balochistan for it is rich in natural resources, and is a prosperous and developing area. Second would be Karachi and Hyderabad, for Urdu-speaking people, named ‘Liquatpur’ or ‘Liquatabad’ and the third would be Sindhudesh.” The truth of this statement could be found in the logic that whenever it comes to the establishment of new provinces, we find the leadership of the Urdu-speaking population standing in the front row.

Likewise, some myths have been created regarding the ‘rights of the Urdu-speaking’. For example we hear repeatedly that thousands of innocent Urdu-speaking people were killed during the two military operations in the 1990s. The MQM leaders give the impression that Sindhis were uncivilized, illiterate and uncultured, and they came here and gave the original Sindhis civilisation, culture and a new lifestyle.

Amar Jaleel, a true Karachi lover in his book Literature and Politics puts light on the situation in Karachi in the following words:

“…In such a situation, Mumtaz Bhutto, with power and might, announced from radio and television that from now Sindhi would be the official language of Sindh. On the other hand, Urdu-speaking people misunderstood it and thought their language was being wiped out from Sindh.” Jaleel further writes that the riots of 1972-73 were the greatest riots in the history of Karachi at that time.

It is quite clear from this recent short history that there are people who are involved in the conspiracy of dividing Sindh, but the people of Sindh have always resisted and stood against these conspiracies. They have defended their motherland, and they know fully well how to defend it. The entire country is on fire, please don’t add fuel to it. If Sindh is not a holy cow then it is not a piece of cake either that you cut it and shout: ‘Bhai! Happy birthday!’

 

The writer can be reached at [email protected]

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.