• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Mohammad A Qadeer

The writer is a professor emeritus at Queen's University, Canada

Sowing despair and distrust in society

Published on: October 28, 2020 7:39 AM

October 28, 2020 by Mohammad A Qadeer

We Pakistanis talk endlessly about corruption, profiteering, the black market, fake medicines and lawlessness. We trust no one ,except those with whom we have connections. Impersonal rules are viewed with suspicion and our first response is to get around them. The glue of morals and trust that binds societies is melting away from our public life. We have collectively come to this state of affairs by our political practices and national narratives over the years. But I want to focus on the past few years as an illustration of the process that has brought us to what l believe, Hamid Mohsin so rightly has expressed as a state of learned helplessness.

Words matter, beliefs guide actions and national narratives condition people’s outlook. For long partisan sentiments have overwhelmed our thoughts. The newspapers, TV and social media are all full of verified and unverified claims of wrong doings. The PTI’s government has gone hoarse accusing the previous rulers of corruption and the theft of the public treasury. It has promised to bring them to books and recover their ‘loot’.

There is no credible forum to deliberate national policies in the public interest relatively free from the politics of personal enmities

Yet little has happened. Not much has been recovered from from the previous rulers and their associates. They have been periodically arrested, continually tried but have only suffered short detentions, relieved by bail from the courts, without major actionable proofs being found so far. The opposition parties and politicians offer their own accounts of the government’s self-dealings. The war of accusations promotes national despair and the feeling that nothing can change. ‘All are corrupt, and no one is trustworthy’ is the common refrain.

Cycles of politics and public despair

A wave of enthusiasm swept when Imran Khan came to power. He particularly enthused the youth. But the divergence between his claims and reality has reinforced the long-established public mood of hopelessness. Yet this outburst of hope pinned on a person is a periodic phenomenon in Pakistan.

In Pakistan, cycles of hope and disappointment have occurred almost with clockwork regularity. The rise and fall of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and Muslim League (ML) governments have followed three cycles of elections, mostly indulging in politics of revenge and mutual accusations leading to the military coups ending the political instability. The promises of every cycle raise hopes only to be dashed by their failure to materialize. Pakistanis can’t be blamed for being cynical about the possibility of change in public life.

The media, particularly Urdu medium, has fed the hopelessness by its conspiracy theories and person-focussed blame games. Our national and provincial assemblies have long ceased to be deliberative bodies for policymaking. There is no credible forum to deliberate national policies in the public interest relatively free from the politics of personal enmities.

That events have causes other than the personal behaviour of leaders is an outlook not found in our media and political discourse. The prices may be high because of the low productivity or supply not keeping with demand but this understanding is seldom discussed in our popular television shows .Our population may be growing beyond the carrying capacity of our land and resources. Yet you will rarely hear about it.

Incompetence and irresponsibility are factors that escape our public discussions, though they stalk all of our national institutions. We suffer their effects every day in hospitals, on roads ,in the electric supply and almost everywhere else. Yet our analysis of problems is primarily couched in terms of officials’ corruption and immorality. A vivid current example these days is the rapidly rising prices of food and other necessities. Our portrayals blame unnamed hoarders, black marketers or corrupt public officials. A few more police raids and prices will come down, we are promised. Obviously, it has not happened .

Changing narratives to reduce social desperation

We are cultivating collective desperation. Our narratives have to change, to be informed by facts and guided by ethical rules. We need to hold back our tongues and promote fact-based arguments.

Despite our low trust society, enterprising and energetic people of Pakistan have channeled their energies to the no-holds-barred pursuit of self-interest, by legitimate and illegitimate means. Our booming cities, rising sales of expensive cars and houses, filtering down of motorcycles and cell phones to the lower classes are expressions of unrestrained pursuit of personal gains.

Pakistanis have created a form of the 19th century free enterprise society, where the solidarity of family, clan and social networks has become the basis for personal advancement. Yet without a fair as well as trustful collective life our personal success will not bring us security and satisfaction. For example, one may have a nice house but without sewers, drains and safe streets, it is a hazardous place to live. Presently for Pakistanis , private comfort comes at the cost of public squalor. To build a strong and equitable society, we have to begin by changing our ideas and narratives. An enforceable ethics of public discussion has to be agreed upon as a first step in reducing our pervasive discontent.

Mohammad Qadeer is a professor emeritus of Planning in Queen’s University, Canada

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

US and Iran exchange strikes near Strait of Hormuz

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

US and Iran exchange strikes near Strait of Hormuz

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.