• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Irfan Khan

Irfan Khan

Researcher of Natural Sciences at Department of Physics, QAU Islamabad

A bumpy road to Afghanistan’s re-settlement

Published on: February 3, 2019 1:45 AM

United States announcement of troops withdrawal from Afghanistan, in the last month of 2018, put national and international politics into chaos. Following this decision, it was evinced that half of the 14000 troops may be withdrawn from Afghanistan. Trump’s decision revealed a shift from “gunboat diplomacy” to a more beneficial mode. The next step followed by the US was the promulgation of a peace talk with Taliban, for which Trump asked Pakistan, UAE and Saudi-Arabia to facilitate a negotiation with Taliban. Subsequently, three successful sessions were held in UAE.

The next session that was supposed to be held in Qatar was cancelled by Taliban, reportedly they wanted a withdrawal timeline and the release of prisoners. Despite the fact that the Afghan government was the main stakeholder, the  Taliban still rejected their involvement in reconciliation and the future setup for ruling. This makes a bumpy road to the Afghanistan peace process.

The next session that was supposed to be held in Qatar was cancelled by Taliban, reportedly they wanted a withdrawal timeline and the release of prisoners. Despite the fact that the Afghan government was the main stakeholder,the Taliban still rejected their involvement in reconciliation and the future setup for ruling

According to a research carried out by BBC in January 2018, the Taliban were active in 70 percent of Afghanistan then or were in control of 14 districts. They could not, however, make any spectacular advancement after the drawdown of over 100,000 troops in 2014. The over 350,000 strong Afghan National Army, despite defections and heavy casualties, was able to restrain the Taliban from taking over any major city.

There are three possibilities, which may have likely to occur. Firstly, from the start, Taliban wants a complete exit of the US from Afghanistan. Furthermore, the Taliban considered the Afghan government the US’s puppet and hence, they are not inclined to allow a government administration for future ruling. India also wishes to establish a relationship with Kabul, which is possible only in the absence of Taliban government. India is a strategic partner to the US and China is strategic partner to Pakistan. It is crucial to note that America focuses on China and India focuses on Pakistan. With this simple diplomatic arithmetic, if America does leave, then a civil war might start in the region which plausibly would invoke regional players to intervene. There will be “let them fight”, US policy to emerge in a trade war instead.

Secondly, Taliban will form mainstream politics. If Taliban emerge as a political party in Afghanistan, then it is a favorable option but it still does not trace a peaceful path for an Afghanistan settlement. In this case, the political climate will be somewhat like Pakistan. It is hard to evince who won- Taliban or America? The Taliban want the country to be ruled under the laws of “Sharia” while the US does not favor such a form of government. US has been sitting in Afghanistan since a long time, and has made their ideological differences clear. So, Taliban as an Islamist political party, with the coexistence of other parties will again invite the US and Pakistan to interfere in Afghan national politics. However, workable relations may occur in the case among US and regional players. And the last option is the US’ complete exit.

Published in Daily Times, February 3rd 2019.

Filed Under: Perspectives

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.