• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Masood Rehman

‘Sheer negligence’ led to Bhoja Air plane crash: SC

Published on: July 3, 2018 3:58 AM

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Monday noted that according to the judicial commission’s report, sheer negligence of Bhoja Airline led to the crash of its plane killing 152 people onboard.

Bhoja Airline’s flight 213 had crashed during landing at the Benazir Bhutto International Airport in Islamabad in 2012, killing all 146 passengers and six crew members onboard.

A three-member bench comprising Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, Justice Umar Ata Bandial and Justice Ijazul Ahsan was hearing a suo motu case pertaining to the crash of Air Blue, PIA and Bhoja Airline planes and nonpayment of compensations to the legal heirs of the victims.

The court directed the police to investigate Bhoja Airline plane crash incident as per the FIR within six weeks and submit challan in the trial court.T he court also directed the high courts and other courts where the cases of Bhoja Air crash are pending to decide those in one month.

During the hearing, the federal government submitted a report in the court which stated that the defunct Bhoja Air committed a series of violations including the initiation of its operations ‘when the company was financially not in the soundest of health and seemed not to possess requisite infrastructure’. The report stated that the defunct Bhoja Airline had asked the Civil Association Authority (CAA) to grant the doomed aircraft permission to fly without an airworthiness certificate.”Neither was the airplane certified to carry passengers nor was the crew trained to handle emergency situations such as analysing rough weather,” the report added. It said the pilot was neither given relevant training for the job nor did he have enough experience to fly a commercial carrier.

During the proceedings, the counsel for PIA apprised the court that families of all the victims had been compensated except for one who has filed a suit against the national carrier.

Counsel for Bhoja Air apprised the court that they had paid all the affectees. However, counsel for the affectees said that one of the accused nominated in the FIR is out on bail. The court then directed that the cases against those who are out on bail should be decided within a month.

The counsel of Air Blue, one of whose aircraft crashed near Islamabad in 2010 and left all 146 people onboard dead, informed the court that all the affectees have been compensated except six as they chose not to take the compensation money.

The chief justice then noted that it is the right of the affectees to claim compensation. The counsel of the victims’ families informed the court that his clients are ready to accept compensation but the matter is under litigation in civil courts.

The chief justice noted that the management of Air Blue was directed to deposit the compensation funds with the apex court registrar, but it only deposited cheques. He also noted that the Air Blue management kept the money with itself and earned mark-up on it. The court also imposed aRs50,000 fine on Air Blue for not submitting its response to the court on time. The court directed that the compensatory cheques should be encashed and the money should be invested in a profitable scheme.

The court directed that after summer vacations of the courts, the civil cases should be heard and disposed of within three months. Later, the court adjourned the hearing for an indefinite period.

Published in Daily Times, July 3rd 2018.

Filed Under: Islamabad Tagged With: Headline

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.