• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Saman Zulfqar

The BJP is redefining India-Pakistan relations

Published on: November 14, 2014 7:00 PM

November 14, 2014 by Saman Zulfqar

Recent tensions along the Line of Control (LoC) have shattered hopes of improving the relationship between India and Pakistan. Many hopes were nurtured of improving bilateral relations after the change of governments in Pakistan and India in 2013 and 2014 respectively. Contrary to expectations, Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government has formulated an aggressive policy towards Pakistan. Though cross-border firing along the LoC has continued from time to time despite being a violation of the 2003 ceasefire agreement, it has intensified significantly under the Modi government, resulting in dozens of civilian casualties. Kashmiris on both sides of the LoC were the victims of heavy bombardment this October. The Hindustan Times reported that in a single day, on October 9, Indian forces fired more than a thousand mortar shells into Azad Kashmir. Indian estimates say that the heavy firing killed 35 civilians in Azad Kashmir and 20 civilians in Indian Held Kashmir. Given the intensity of the crisis, the actual death toll is likely to be much higher.

The current crisis in bilateral relations started with the Indian government’s cancellation of a meeting scheduled to be held in August between the foreign secretaries of the two countries. This was allegedly in response to the Pakistani High Commissioner in New Delhi meeting Hurriyat leaders before the talks began. India termed the meeting as being “interference” in internal Indian affairs. There was nothing unusual about the High Commissioner meeting Hurriyat leaders as such meetings have been a longstanding Pakistani practice and was accepted and even facilitated by successive Indian governments, including the previous BJP government that was in power from 1998 to 2003. This volte-face is being seen as an attempt to rewrite the rules of engagement with Pakistan. Denying Kashmiri leaders a legitimate role in the composite dialogue between India and Pakistan is bound to further complicate an already complex set of issues. The BJP’s manifesto has a provision for abrogating or revising Article 370 of the Indian Constitution that grants Kashmir a special status while limiting the Indian parliament’s law making powers with regard to Jammu and Kashmir.

Earlier, during his visit to Ladakh, Prime Minister (PM) Modi accused Pakistan of waging a “proxy war” in India’s only Muslim majority province. In response, Pakistan has been aggressively countering India’s claim that Kashmir remains an integral part of India. The most recent interaction between the two sides was between the Pakistani and Indian delegations at the UN General Assembly. Responding to an Indian delegate’s comments regarding State Assembly elections in Kashmir, Pakistani delegates asserted that the people of Kashmir had rejected these elections and that UN resolutions had clarified that elections in Kashmir conducted by Indian authorities would not be a substitute for a free and impartial plebiscite conducted under the auspices of the UN. There have already been numerous protests in the Kashmir Valley against the proposed State elections.

Elections in Kashmir could be an important factor in Modi’s rhetoric as the Election Commission of India (ECI) has announced that it will hold State elections in Kashmir sometime during the next two months. The BJP aspires to garner votes in Jammu and Ladakh by replacing the Congress and National Conference alliance. As usual, the Pakistan factor was highlighted by the BJP though the rhetoric seemed specially made for Kashmir, where making negative references to Pakistan makes political sense. When running election campaigns in other Indian states, Modi does not play the Pakistan card as India has a number of problems of its own that can be used to appeal to voters.

The BJP government had the opportunity to resume the dialogue process with Pakistan but seems more concerned about playing a hegemonic role in the South Asian region. Speculation about improving trade ties, energy cooperation and expanding the comprehensive dialogue on water and environmental issues has become a distant reality. The dialogue process could have been initiated by addressing these less contentious issues since Kashmir is the core issue between the two states. The political rhetoric of BJP leaders and a new coercive policy towards Pakistan have damaged bilateral relations. The deteriorating situation has now been noticed by Indian analysts as well who have criticised the BJP government for a disproportionate show of force that has brought India-Pakistan relations to their lowest ebb in a decade. The BJP, with its goal of rapid economic growth in India as enunciated in its election manifesto, does not seem to realise that prosperity and regional peace remain hostage to the bilateral relations of the two most important regional players.

 

The writer works at the Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI) and can be reached at [email protected]

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Trump says US nearing Iran uranium deal

Delhi orders fire safety crackdown after tragedy

Nora Fatehi to perform at FIFA opener

Israeli strikes kill 10 despite ceasefire push

Lebanese president tells Iran to stay out

Pakistan

4.9-magnitude quake felt in Lahore

Naqvi calls for joint SCO security strategy

US-Iran peace could unlock $20bn for Pakistan

Momina Iqbal’s PECA complaint lands MPA in case

AJK elections slated for July 27; EC issues code

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP reserves climb to $17.19 billion

Govt unveils fixed tax scheme for traders

Govt introduces fixed tax scheme for small traders nationwide

Gold and silver prices decline after market correction

Bitcoin slump deepens as investors chase AI opportunities

More Posts from this Category

World

Trump says US nearing Iran uranium deal

Delhi orders fire safety crackdown after tragedy

Israeli strikes kill 10 despite ceasefire push

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.