• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Sunday, June 7, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Nawazish Ali

Nawazish Ali

The writer is a retired Pakistan army officer

What Pakistan needs to do in Afghanistan

Published on: June 23, 2021 2:50 AM

June 23, 2021 by Nawazish Ali

Taliban will be taking over Afghanistan in a couple of months. On the 20th anniversary of World Trade Centres, all US forces will be out of Afghanistan. September 11, 2001 was the day that changed America and the world forever once again. But the million dollar question is, why has US decided to leave the evolving scenario?

After the Soviets invaded Afghanistan on December 24, 1979, Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Advisor of the US in 1998 during an interview with Nouvel Observateur, a French news magazine, claimed that the US policymakers had lured the Soviets into Afghanistan to expedite disintegration of the erstwhile USSR. It proved correct though by default. In 1980, Iraqi invasion of the newly established Islamic Republic of Iran provided a pretext for acquisition of ports by US on the Persian Gulf, from which Allied forces could invade and occupy Iraq. After a decade, Iraq occupied Kuwait in August 1990, creating a pretext for Operation Desert Storm by U.S forces in 1991. A decade later after 9/11 in 2001, the United States invaded Afghanistan, and finally did get around to invading Iraq in 2003 to destroy ‘weapons of mass destruction’.

Donald Trump, former President of US, made a wrong agreement with the Taliban and later handed the deal over to his successor. He steadily reduced forces from Afghanistan with no effort to use withdrawals as to exert pressure on the Taliban to meet their own commitments. By the time Trump left his office, US had just 2,500 or so troops in Afghanistan. President Joe Biden should have rejected it, instead of embracing it. Is it a part of grand strategy or stratagem for a distant future?

What happens in Afghanistan does not stay in Afghanistan and Pakistanis feel completely vindicated in their support for the Taliban

In April while defending the decision to withdraw all American troops from Afghanistan, Biden made a questionable statement as if he needs further understanding of Afghanistan, “With the terror threat now in many places, keeping thousands of troops grounded and concentrated in just one country at a cost of billions each year makes little sense to me and to our leaders.” Biden maintains that the United States must pay more attention to other areas that could threaten US interests. That is prudent. But it is hard to believe that the US military does not have the necessary forces to fulfil all its missions because 2500 troops are in Afghanistan. One can only hope that US comprehensive withdrawal is not aimed at shaping the future strategic environments for another major showdown in the region.

US is not concluding a war but leaving the ‘battle space vacuum’ to the adversaries. What will be the fall out of this decision? No serious discussions between the Taliban and the Afghan government will take place. The Taliban have no reason to negotiate. The US ability to gather intelligence will be degraded as the capacity of Afghan security forces to remain in the field is almost negligible. Afghanistan of tomorrow will be the hottest bed of all types of conspiracies.

The Taliban advances and especially a Taliban takeover in Afghanistan could galvanise Islamist terrorists in Pakistan, including an already-resurgent Pakistani Taliban. The expected civil war in Afghanistan, following the US withdrawal, will be shocking for Pakistan in terms of instability in tribal belts and an opportunity for various militant groups to use war-torn areas for their activities and hiding.

For decades, one of Pakistan’s key goals in Afghanistan has been to keep India at bay. So long as the peace process is still happening, Pakistan will fully support it, because it is in the best interest of Pakistan leading to a political settlement. If the peace process collapses, regional actors would fall back on the empowerment of respective proxies war lords. Islamabad will be constrained to scale up support to the Taliban to give it an upper hand against rival groups supported by the likes of India.

Islamabad must oppose and undermine any Indian engagement with the Afghan Taliban or backing anti-Taliban units, such as the Northern Alliance. What happens in Afghanistan does not stay in Afghanistan and Pakistanis feel completely vindicated in their support for the Taliban. The US withdrawal will make Taliban stronger either by giving it the upper hand in negotiations with Kabul or a major battlefield advantage, or both.

After the last American soldier departs Afghanistan in September, Pakistan will be left with some very difficult and unsavoury choices. Since the early 1990s, Pakistan has supported the Taliban in Afghanistan in one way or the other to push forward its regional security interests. Islamabad will now have to build trust with all Afghan ethnicities and political forces, rather than just being seen as a ‘Taliban supporter’ as Pakistan has earned a sound reputation by playing an effective role as a mediator. However, this effort on Islamabad’s part may have also uncovered the limits of the country’s influence on the group.

The writer is a retired Pakistan army officer. He can be reached at [email protected]

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Pope criticizes US-Israeli war on Iran

Turkish trawler sunk in Black Sea attack

Israeli strike threatens fragile Lebanon truce

Pakistan, Russia sign major security accords

Saudi Arabia condemns Iran missile attacks

Pakistan

Pakistan, Russia sign major security accords

Five killed in South Waziristan firing

PM Shehbaz reviews Tehran visit with Naqvi

No talks with agitators, says AJK PM

Pakistan urges UN action on Kashmir

More Posts from this Category

Business

Govt considers tax relief for salons, gyms in Budget 2026-27

PESCO approves one-month salary bonus for employees

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

More Posts from this Category

World

Pope criticizes US-Israeli war on Iran

Turkish trawler sunk in Black Sea attack

Israeli strike threatens fragile Lebanon truce

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.