• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Thursday, June 18, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
S M Hali

S M Hali

<em>The writer is a retired Group Captain of PAF. He is a columnist, analyst and TV talk show host, who has authored six books on current affairs, including three on China</em>

Will there be lasting peace in Nagorno-Karabakh?

Published on: November 21, 2020 8:27 AM

November 21, 2020 by S M Hali

The guns have finally silenced after the most recent conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Apparently, in only 40 days, Azerbaijan achieved what it had been struggling for over 30 years. The first Nagorno-Karabakh war started as an ethnic and territorial conflict that took place from the late 1980s to May 1994, in the enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh in south-western Azerbaijan. The war was fought between the majority ethnic Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh, who were backed by Armenia, and the Republic of Azerbaijan, who were part of the Soviet Republic. Azerbaijan was attempting to curb the secessionist movement in Nagorno-Karabakh while the enclave’s parliament had voted in favour of uniting itself with Armenia and a referendum, boycotted by the Azerbaijani population of Nagorno-Karabakh, was held, whereby most of the voters voted in favour of independence.

With the disintegration of the USSR, the conflict became more violent and inter-ethnic clashes between the two broke out shortly after the parliament of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) in Azerbaijan voted to unify the region with Armenia on 20 February 1988. Azerbaijan declared its independence from the Soviet Union and got rid of the enclave’s government. On the other side, the Armenian majority voted to secede from Azerbaijan and in the process proclaimed the unrecognized Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh.

In early 1992, full-scale fighting erupted and despite international mediation by various groups, the hostilities continued. In early 1993, Armenian forces captured regions outside the enclave itself, raising the alarm bells for their neighbours.  When the war ended in 1994, the Armenians were in full control of the enclave (with the exception of the Shahumyan Region) in addition to surrounding areas, most notably the Lachin Corridor — a mountain pass that links Nagorno-Karabakh with mainland Armenia.  Russia brokered a ceasefire in May 1994, but failed to have a peace treaty signed. Resultantly, the Nagorno-Karabakh area was left in a state of legal limbo, with the Republic of Artsakh, another name for Nagorno-Karabakh Republic remained de-facto independent but internationally unrecognized while Armenian forces controlled approximately 9% of Azerbaijan’s territory outside the enclave. Sporadic fighting continued in subsequent decades while various attempts to broker peace by different international organizations including the UN and OIC failed to get the desired results.

Observers opine that the multimillion Armenian diaspora has strongly supported Russia’s role in mediating the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and its influential members openly call for Pashinyan’s removal.

The current conflict between the oil-rich Caspian nation of Azerbaijan and its impoverished, resource-poor neighbour and long-time enemy, Armenia began on the morning of 27 September 2020 along the Nagorno-Karabakh Line of Contact. This time, heavy artillery, armoured warfare, rocket attacks, the use of drones and cluster munitions along with ballistic missile attacks on civilian populations alarmed the world in general and the neighbouring countries in the region.

Russia managed to convince both sides to call a truce, putting an abrupt end to the six-week-long conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh. Resultantly, Azerbaijan got what it had been fighting for on the desolate, sun-parched hillsides and at diplomatic conferences for almost 30 years.

According to the Russia-brokered truce, Armenian forces will withdraw from the territory they still control within Azerbaijani districts around Nagorno-Karabakh. Azerbaijan will keep all the areas it recaptured since the conflict flared up on September 27, including Shusha, the region’s second-largest city, known to Armenians as Shushi. Russian peacekeepers will guard a route linking Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh.

While euphoric Azerbaijani crowds celebrate their “victory”, the Armenians face humiliation because they agreed to give Baku a new transit corridor through southern Armenia to Azerbaijan’s southwestern exclave of Nakhichevan. Armenian Prime Minister NikolPashinyan’s government is plunged into a political abyss because enraged protesters stormed into his residence, the parliament building and pillaged government offices, demanding his resignation.

Armenians are incensed because they feel their government capitulated and there may be coup attempts. There are chances that if the West-leaning Pashinyan steps down, his successor may resume the conflict, some observers warned but the chances of that will reduce with Russian peacekeepers being deployed there.

Irrespective of whether Pashinyan is forced to step down or continues in power, many Armenians consider the new peace deal long-term and stable. They opine that even if there is a change in government, the successors will stick to the terms of the peace agreement.

The peace deal has raised the prestige of Russia in the South Caucasus region. For the last two centuries, Russia had been gradually annexing Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia, which were the stronghold of the Ottoman Empire. In the aftermath of the Soviet collapse, Moscow has been endeavouring to establish its clout in the South Caucasus. It backed separatists in two separatist provinces in Georgia, recognizing their independence after the 2008 war with Georgia and installed sizable military contingents there. Moscow already has a military base in Armenia, and the arrival of Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh and southern Armenia will mean all three ex-Soviet nations of South Caucasus will host the Russian military.

Landlocked and resource-stricken Armenia had been reaching out to the EU but received limited response. In 2013 it sought to clinch a free-trade deal with the EU but at the last minute, opted to join the Eurasian Economic Union, a Moscow-dominated bloc of ex-Soviet nations.

The new deal let Armenia boost exports to Russia and gave Armenian labour migrants working there a chance to avoid bureaucratic hurdles. Observers opine that the multimillion Armenian diaspora has strongly supported Russia’s role in mediating the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and its influential members openly call for Pashinyan’s removal.

It may be recalled that former publicist Pashinyan came to power after a series of peaceful protests in Yerevan in 2018 that were dubbed “the Velvet Revolution”. The protests toppled the government of Sargsyan, a native of Nagorno-Karabakh and one of the leaders of the so-called Karabakh Movement of the late 1980s that tried to convince last Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to make the Armenian-dominated Azerbaijani enclave part of Soviet Armenia.

Three earlier truces brokered by Russia, France and the United States, collapsed within hours but the Russian sponsored deal is likely to hold and give peace a chance.

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Strait of Hormuz

Iran and Oman to Develop Joint Management System for the Strait of Hormuz

Esmaeil Baghaei

Iran Confirms Final Text of US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding Has Been Agreed

Islamabad Memorandum

US-Iran ‘Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding’ Draft Reveals 14 Key Points

 “I don’t feel like a stranger here!” – a cleaner from Bangladesh on why she loves Russia

Asad Qaiser

Asad Qaiser Responds to Khawaja Asif Over Claims About FATF Bills and ISI Input

Pakistan

Asad Qaiser

Asad Qaiser Responds to Khawaja Asif Over Claims About FATF Bills and ISI Input

MQM

MQM Conditions Budget Vote on Restoration of Sindh Governorship and Amendment to Article 140-A

Pakistani overseas

Over 278,000 Pakistanis Moved Abroad for Employment by May 2026

PTI government talks

PTI Agrees to Hold Talks with Government, Welcomes PM’s Dialogue Offer

Gilgit-Baltistan government

PPP Contacts PTI and MWM for Government Formation in Gilgit-Baltistan

More Posts from this Category

Business

LHC bars parents from waiving minors’ rights in rulings

Petrol prices may drop soon: minister

Government intensifies talks with PPP over budget approval

Sindh cabinet approves Rs3.562 trillion budget for fiscal year

IMF objections cast doubt on property sector relief

More Posts from this Category

World

Strait of Hormuz

Iran and Oman to Develop Joint Management System for the Strait of Hormuz

Esmaeil Baghaei

Iran Confirms Final Text of US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding Has Been Agreed

Islamabad Memorandum

US-Iran ‘Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding’ Draft Reveals 14 Key Points

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.