• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Thursday, June 11, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

inp

PHC issues decision on PTI leaders’ protective bail

Published on: December 17, 2025 2:01 AM

The Peshawar High Court has issued a four-page written verdict regarding the applications filed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leaders seeking protective bail.

The court’s decision recommends the formation of a larger bench to hear such cases, following a suggestion by the Federal Prosecutor General.

According to the verdict, the Federal Prosecutor General argued that applicants repeatedly approach the courts for the same type of relief, which constitutes an abuse of the judicial process. The decision also highlighted instances where PTI leader Asad Qaiser failed to appear before the relevant courts despite being granted protective bail.

The court noted that some applicants remain on bail for extended periods without participating in ongoing investigations, which violates legal requirements. Furthermore, the Federal Prosecutor General pointed out the absence of a uniform policy in courts regarding the grant of protective or transit bail, which conflicts with Supreme Court directives.

In light of these concerns, the Peshawar High Court has directed the Chief Justice to constitute a larger bench to examine protective bail cases. The court also ordered the Federal Prosecutor General to provide complete details of all cases filed against the applicants within seven days.

The verdict emphasized that judicial relief must not be misused for protests or activities against the state. Applicants were strictly warned to utilize court orders only within the legal framework, failing which they would face strict legal consequences.

Filed Under: Pakistan

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

NDMA issues flood alert for northern pakistan until june 15

Khyber pakhtunkhwa budget projected at Rs2.3tr for fiscal year

Punjab extends market closure timings under austerity plan

Three indian sailors killed in gulf of oman strike

Iran denies US claims, says fully prepared

Pakistan

NDMA issues flood alert for northern pakistan until june 15

Khyber pakhtunkhwa budget projected at Rs2.3tr for fiscal year

Punjab extends market closure timings under austerity plan

Punjab enforces section 144 for muharram security measures

Dar, Egyptian FM push diplomatic dialogue

More Posts from this Category

Business

IMF agrees to drop solar panel tax hike

Pakistan budget 2026-27 unveiled with fiscal targets

Pakistan gold prices drop by over Rs9,000 per tola

Oil prices surge as US-Iran tensions threaten supplies

Pakistan GDP expands 3.7%, marking four-year high

More Posts from this Category

World

Three indian sailors killed in gulf of oman strike

Iran denies US claims, says fully prepared

Donald Trump

Trump: Heavy Iran strike, oil seizure planned

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.