• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Sunday, June 7, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Dominic O'Connell

‘That was chilling’: ten years since the financial crash

Published on: August 14, 2017 5:59 AM

Ten years ago the then chancellor, Alistair Darling, was on holiday and had walked to the shops to buy bread rolls for breakfast. He picked up a copy of the Financial Times. It stopped him in his tracks as he walked home.

The lead story was about a French bank, BNP Paribas, which had been forced to close two of its hedge funds, admitting they were in effect worthless.

There were similar problems at some second-tier German lenders. Mr Darling – now Lord Darling – thought something must be seriously wrong, and that given the connectedness of the world financial system, it was probably heading his way.

He hadn’t been in the job long. He arrived at Number 11 in July 2007, and as he recalled in an interview with the BBC to mark the 10th anniversary of the banking crisis, there was no mention of problems with financial stability in his briefings from Treasury officials. The anniversary date for the financial crisis is generally regarded as 9 August – the day of the events that made the front page of Lord Darling’s Financial Times.

The closure of the BNP Paribas funds sparked a sharp escalation in the cost of credit for all banks, created a panic in financial markets, and led directly to all the other tumultuous events of the next year – the run on Northern Rock, the demise of Lehman Brothers, and the shocking bailout of Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds/HBOS by the British taxpayer, at the cost of tens of billions of pounds.

There were, however, plenty of earlier warning signs. In January 2007, HSBC warned about a sharp rise in mortgage defaults at its US offshoot, a lender called Household. Household had – perhaps more than HSBC knew when it bought it – specialised in the “sub-prime” loans that eventually triggered the crisis. About the same time, Darling now ruefully recalls, the Financial Services Authority, the British banking regulator, produced a report questioning the business model of Northern Rock. The report noted that Northern Rock was over-reliant on what was called “wholesale” funding – ie large amounts of money borrowed from other financial institutions, rather than funds that came from customer deposits.

In the unlikely event that the wholesale markets dried up, Northern Rock could face difficulties. The study attracted little attention, but turned out to be remarkably prescient.

In June of 2007 came a much clearer warning sign. Bear Stearns, a venerable Wall Street bank, had to stop customers withdrawing money from two of its investment funds. The funds had specialised in the financial products that had been created on the back of those sub-prime mortgages.

These products were, in theory, designed to spread risk; individual loans were packaged up into new types of securities called collateralised debt obligations, or CDOs.

These packages contained a mix of loans; the plan was that because it was highly unlikely that all the loans would fail, they were safer.

But Wall Street built a financial pyramid on top of them, creating new derivative trades that piled risk and leverage on top of the basic lending. When a few of the loans started to go wrong, the panic spread.

Bear Stearns found, suddenly, that it could not find a buyer for any of its investment funds; at that moment, they were worthless.

The events at BNP Paribas fanned the flames, and by the end of the year the markets were in full retreat. As 2008 unfolded, those at the top of the big institutions feared the worst.

Sir Win Bischoff, the veteran British banker who was chairman of Citigroup through the crisis, and went on to be chairman of Lloyds Banking Group, told the BBC that at the start of the rout, he and others had “probably not” known how bad things were. “There was, I think, an element of wishful thinking.” Sir Win soon became convinced of how serious things were when Hank Paulson, then US Treasury Secretary, began discussions in earnest about a programme of American government support for the big banks. “That was a moment at which I thought it could be really bad. We took some comfort though that Merrill Lynch [another big Wall Street bank] had been saved by a merger – although it was a reluctant merger – with Bank of America.”

The crisis peaked with the demise of Lehman Brothers, another Wall Street bank that, like Bear Stearns, had piled aggressively into investment banking and trading. Its boss, Dick Fuld, remained defiant until the end, but had had a premonition of his own downfall. Andrew Gowers, the former Financial Times editor who was working as an in-house PR man at Lehman Brothers when it went under, told the BBC he had attended a meeting at Davos, the annual meeting of business leaders in a Swiss ski resort, in January 2007. There, Mr Fuld had told a surprised audience of journalists that “this was the year that markets could crack”. “They were aghast,” Mr Gowers said.

The ripples of Lehman’s demise in September 2008 spread rapidly to the UK. Lord Darling suffered some heart-stopping moments, particularly when Royal Bank of Scotland, which was at that stage the world’s biggest bank, came close to running out of cash.

“I was at a meeting of European finance ministers when I took a call from the chairman of RBS. He said the bank was in danger of running out of money. I said, ‘ok, we have plans in place, how long have you got?’. And he said, ‘a few hours’. That was chilling.”

Lord Darling said there was little alternative to the giant, government-funded rescue plan for RBS and Lloyds/HBOS. “If the plan hadn’t worked, I don’t know where we would have been. Where would we have gone? The International Monetary Fund (the lender backed by the G7 group of the world’s largest economies) isn’t big enough.” time.” 

 

 

Published in Daily Times, August 14th 2017.

Filed Under: Business

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Pope criticizes US-Israeli war on Iran

Turkish trawler sunk in Black Sea attack

Israeli strike threatens fragile Lebanon truce

Pakistan, Russia sign major security accords

Saudi Arabia condemns Iran missile attacks

Pakistan

Pakistan, Russia sign major security accords

Five killed in South Waziristan firing

PM Shehbaz reviews Tehran visit with Naqvi

No talks with agitators, says AJK PM

Pakistan urges UN action on Kashmir

More Posts from this Category

Business

Govt considers tax relief for salons, gyms in Budget 2026-27

PESCO approves one-month salary bonus for employees

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

More Posts from this Category

World

Pope criticizes US-Israeli war on Iran

Turkish trawler sunk in Black Sea attack

Israeli strike threatens fragile Lebanon truce

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.