• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Garga Chatterjee

Garga Chatterjee

Election Commission of India is biased

Published on: November 5, 2017 1:46 AM

November 5, 2017 by Garga Chatterjee

In a multi-national federal union like the Indian Union, the States have ceded a lot of self-governing power to an external entity, erroneously called the centre. This centre appoints the Chief Election Commissioner, who heads the Election Commission of India. Since people of states have ceded power to centre in trust, including the power to hold state elections via the Election Commission of India, when this office become politicised, it is a matter of grave concern. Because, a biased Election Commission of India will help the Centre and the party in power in the Centre, in Union parliament and State assembly elections. This subverts democracy and takes away sovereignty from the people themselves. A biased Election Commission is the sign of a banana republic. From the recent signals being sent by the Election Commission of India and its Chief Election Commissioner, there are good reasons to believe that the Indian Union is on the way to become exactly such a banana republic.

The elections in Gujarat are due this year. This is Indian Union Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s native state. This man’s rise to BJP’s leadership and Indian Union’s Prime Ministership has been aided by 2 key crutches — one, his role during the 2002 anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat and two, his touting of Gujarat being a ‘model’ which served as a testament to his ability to govern and do welfare. This time around, the BJP is not on its strongest wicket in Gujarat. It might still win, but the over-selling of the ‘Gujarat model’ (shown to be completely fraudulent when you look at human development index, women’s empowerment and hunger data and not Adani-Ambani — FICCI-CII endorsements) has meant that the credibility of the Union government’s chief hugely depends on a convincing win in Gujarat. Here ‘convincing’ would naturally mean BJP has to do better than it did last time in the Gujarat Assembly elections, when it used to be a State election and not poster-boy state in the run-up to and after the Modi-prime-ministership. That scenario seems tough and thus the BJP has been using the Election Commission of India to serve its own interests. When the ECI becomes Partisan, this destroys the very basis of democracy. Indira Gandhi’s regime, another ‘strong-leader’ quasi-dictatorship, saw such fundamental erosion of democratic rights of people and democratic character of the state. Under BJP’s Modi, a similar move is being in all fronts. These are extremely dark times.

Only after an elaborate farce was acted out that the Election of Commission of India announced the Gujarat poll dates, even when major Opposition parties had been making noise about the motive behind the delay in announcement

The election dates of Gujarat were supposed to be announced by the Election Commission of India along with the dates for the elections in Himachal Pradesh state. This was widely expected as according to previous conventions. But this did not happen. The game was clear to everyone. The BJP was in a bit of a backfoot in Gujarat on various economic downturn issues and the noises weren’t good. If the poll dates were announced then, the model code of conduct would have set in. That would have put a stop to stop-gap election time sops and project announcement to do last moment hoodwinking.

The Union government would be announcing projects in Gujarat and then only the Election Commission of India would announce dates. Thus, the ECI as an institution would have been into a joke and like the Reserve Bank of India, another quasi-independent state institution would have become an extension of the ruling party in general and a servant of Narendra Modi in particular. As subsequent events showed, this is precisely what happened.

A bullet train project was announced between Mumbai (where Gujaratis own business) and Ahmedabad (the biggest native town of Gujarat) — a project worth one lakh 10 thousand crore Rupees. That’s more than the double of the total annual budget of West Bengal being invested in a high-speed railway project between two cities connected by multiple flights, regular buses and fast trains in which 40 per cent of seats go vacant. This is not some bullet train project. This is a subsidy to the BJP election fund in Gujarat by the public revenue and tax from mostly non-Hindi state citizens. It is a scandal. And Delhi media clapped. Because a certain set of cronies very pally with the BJP owns most of Delhi media.

That’s how sleazy and cynical this gets. And Narendra Modi announced various new projects in installment after installment in the days after the Himachal Pradesh poll date announcement and much of this is to be paid for by Union government funds. Modi visited Gujarat twice in two weeks while he did these announcements, including even the smallest of projects, thus reducing the absentee Prime Minister of the Indian Union into a full-time block level election campaigner. The desperation and anxiety of the BJP showed. And the Election Commission of India played in tandem. Only after this elaborate farce was acted out that the Election of Commission of India announced the Gujarat poll dates, even when major Opposition parties had been making noise about the motive behind the delay in announcement. Highly worried about the elections that would be held under the control of such an ECI, the Congress(I) party asked for a paper train for vote verification by voters. The ECI refused. Any institution interested in transparency would have cooperated. The refusal was ominous. This went to the courts and the courts ordered that a paper trail be kept. But this is just one instance. Because one has no clue about the ways an election can be fixed and thus one is in the dark about how to stop all those ways in such a partisan context. The ECI seems to value its loyalty to the powers-that-be.

Now let me get to something, which may be incidental or sinister. The present Chief Election Commissioner of India Achal Kumar Joti had a previous boss till 2013. His name was Narendra Modi. Achal Kumar Joti, the Chief Election Commissioner of India, was the Chief Secretary under Narendra Modi, Chief Minister of Gujarat. And this happens to be the first Election Commission of India in many decades against whom a charge of such explicit bias has been raised. Thus, when Union parliamentary election happens in 2019, with these elements in charge of running it, there must be extreme vigilance for peaceful and fair transfer of power is at stake — with the fate of 1.3 billion on the hook.  It doesn’t stop with the ex-Chief Secretary of Gujarat. His boss was Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of Gujarat. His party BJP’s president in fellow Gujarati Amit Shah. Reserve Bank of India has seen huge erosion in trust due to its blind execution of Narendra Modi’s directives because a handpicked governor and a Gujarati, Urjit Patel now head RBI.

The 5 richest people in the Indian Union are all Gujarati — who make huge sums in crony deals, crony commodity contracts, crony supply contracts and such other well-crafted loots of public money. Those who have taken most money from government banks and have not given it back, among these worst defaulters, Gujaratis dominate the list. A certain mafia clique has taken over and these patterns are just a scene of how deep the rot is and how predictable is its pattern.

 

The writer is a brain scientist and commentator based in Bengal

Published in Daily Times, November 5th 2017.

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

SBP reserves climb to $17.19 billion

Naqvi calls for joint SCO security strategy

US-Iran peace could unlock $20bn for Pakistan

Govt unveils fixed tax scheme for traders

FIFA launches World Cup game on Netflix

Pakistan

Naqvi calls for joint SCO security strategy

US-Iran peace could unlock $20bn for Pakistan

Momina Iqbal’s PECA complaint lands MPA in case

AJK elections slated for July 27; EC issues code

Khawaja Asif rejects demand on AJK refugee seats issue

More Posts from this Category

Business

Govt introduces fixed tax scheme for small traders nationwide

Gold and silver prices decline after market correction

Bitcoin slump deepens as investors chase AI opportunities

Weekly inflation eases as prices of some essentials decline

Federal budget proposes funding for Karachi development projects

More Posts from this Category

World

Iran ties peace deal to Lebanon ceasefire

CNN claims Israel used secret Azerbaijan bases

Iran fires warning missiles at US warships

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.