• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Mashaal Gauhar

Mashaal Gauhar

The writer is the founding editor of Blue Chip magazine. She tweets @MashaalGauhar

When dialogue succeeds where force does not

Published on: November 4, 2017 2:22 AM

November 4, 2017 by Mashaal Gauhar

The United Kingdom’s response to the Scottish independence movement should serve as an example as the crisis in Catalonia continues to unfold.  The United Kingdom allowed for a Scottish referendum and in spite of the persuasive campaigning by Scotland’s charismatic first Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, Scotland decided to remain part of the United Kingdom.

Spain’s prosperous Catalonia region unilaterally declared independence after a referendum was held by Catalonian separatists yielding a majority vote for independence.  Catalonia’s ousted President Carles Puigdemont and several of his ministers fled to Belgium after being charged with rebellion, sedition and misuse of public funds. Although Spain may have been able to effectively side line the principal galvanizing players of the independence movement, the fear is that this struggle could take on a darker, more divisive tone in the future.

Allowing Scotland to determine its future proved to be a well-played gamble for the UK. Perhaps driven by the searing experience of Northern Ireland where direct rule ultimately failed and resulted in decades of bloodshed, widespread civil disobedience and the formation of terrorist groups, Westminster chose the path of dialogue and democracy. The UK government’s deft handling of the Scottish independence movement has been so successful that even though Edinburgh is calling for a second referendum, secessionist sentiment among Scots seems to have lost its momentum.

Similarly, if the Spanish government had allowed a legal referendum to be held on the question of independence in Catalonia, it is doubtful whether the independence vote would have won.   Recently, tens of thousands gathered to rally for Spanish unity in the city of Barcelona.

Although Spain may have been able to effectively sideline the principal galvanizing players of the independence movement, the fear is that this struggle could take on a darker, more divisive tone in the future

However, there appears to be a trend developing in Europe which governments cannot ignore – the desire for greater autonomy from central government. Last month, the Lombardy and Veneto regions of Italy voted for increased self-governing powers. Lombardy’s leader Roberto Maroni was quick to differentiate between the Italian referendum and the crisis in Spain, “We remain inside the Italian nation with more autonomy while Catalonia wants to become the 29th state of the European Union. We, no. Not for now.”

Though the outcome of a referendum may be unpalatable for many, the breakup of historic unions, loss of power, resources, electoral constituencies and national identity, crushing moves towards self-determination only leads to disastrous consequences. As in Kashmir, the brutal suppression of the people’s’ right for self-determination has allowed a separatist insurgency to develop. Authorities have routinely responded with violence resulting in a conflict that has claimed several thousands of lives.

Through the decades, Catalonia’s calls for independence have always been peaceful. Accusations of excessive use of force by the Spanish police following Catalonia’s referendum is a reminder for countries dealing with issues of self-determination versus territorial integrity. The Kashmir issue is illustrative of the fact that rejecting the path of dialogue in favour of heavy-handed measures only strengthens resistance, making the demands for self-determination even more clamorous.

 

The writer is the founding editor of Blue Chip magazine. She tweets @MashaalGauhar

Published in Daily Times, November 4th 2017.

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

SBP reserves climb to $17.19 billion

Naqvi calls for joint SCO security strategy

US-Iran peace could unlock $20bn for Pakistan

Govt unveils fixed tax scheme for traders

FIFA launches World Cup game on Netflix

Pakistan

Naqvi calls for joint SCO security strategy

US-Iran peace could unlock $20bn for Pakistan

Momina Iqbal’s PECA complaint lands MPA in case

AJK elections slated for July 27; EC issues code

Khawaja Asif rejects demand on AJK refugee seats issue

More Posts from this Category

Business

Govt introduces fixed tax scheme for small traders nationwide

Gold and silver prices decline after market correction

Bitcoin slump deepens as investors chase AI opportunities

Weekly inflation eases as prices of some essentials decline

Federal budget proposes funding for Karachi development projects

More Posts from this Category

World

Iran ties peace deal to Lebanon ceasefire

CNN claims Israel used secret Azerbaijan bases

Iran fires warning missiles at US warships

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.