• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Munir Khan

Parallel lives — II

Published on: August 24, 2011 7:00 PM

August 24, 2011 by Munir Khan

A Q Khan was born in Bhopal, India and, unlike Salam, was an immigrant to Pakistan and migrated to the new nation with his family at the time of the partition of India. The journey to Pakistan as a refugee was a traumatic one and it clearly had a profound effect upon Khan, who developed a lifelong antipathy for India. He grew up in a devoutly Muslim household that held orthodox Sunni views. Following his fall from grace, his cause has been championed by many Islamists (amongst others), and they have always claimed him as one their own. His life had much in common with one of his later patrons: dictator Ziaul Haq. Both were refugees from India and enjoyed the adulation and patronage of the Islamists. Khan’s academic achievements did not enjoy the stellar trajectory of Salam’s, and he rose up the ladder of academia with modest results and eventually became a metallurgist by training.

Khan’s career took off after a spell in the Netherlands working for FDO and URENCO, both companies specialising in work relating to the nuclear industry in general and the building of centrifuges in particular. Considerable controversy surrounds Khan’s work in the Netherlands with claims that, on the pretext of translating highly confidential documents relating to the building of nuclear centrifuges, Khan secretly copied these designs and took them with him to Pakistan. This led to a court in the Netherlands convicting him in absentia for industrial espionage (denied by Khan). Khan was without doubt a talented metallurgist, but arouses considerable fury amongst nuclear scientists in Pakistan who refuse to acknowledge his title of ‘father of Pakistan’s nuclear bomb’ — a mantle that Khan is more than happy to accept and takes great pride in recounting his own central role in the nuclear programme at fawning Islamist gatherings.

A turning point in Khan’s life was the 1971 debacle leading to the break-up of Pakistan, and the ascendancy of India as a nuclear-armed nation. Khan had by this time started to court Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and assured him that he could deliver a viable nuclear weapons programme. Khan aroused fury and suspicion amongst other nuclear scientists in Pakistan but, through a mixture of conspiracy against the Pakistani nuclear establishment and displays of extreme antipathy towards India, he was able to find patronage amongst the military elite. By the time Zia took over the country, Khan had become the nuclear weapons programme supremo and had sole charge of the weapons programme, specifically the building of nuclear centrifuges. Khan had persuaded Zia to remove his programme from oversight of the civilian Pakistan Nuclear Energy Commission (PNEC), and instead had brought in the army’s corps of engineers as his partners in development.

Little is known about when exactly Khan began his nuclear proliferation programme; suffice it to say that it would seem that there were little or no checks and balances or civilian oversight of Khan’s activities. By 1998, following the successful testing and explosion of a nuclear device, Khan was acclaimed as a national hero and crowned the father of the nuclear bomb by a wildly exuberant and patriotic Pakistani populace.

Khan’s acclaim and adulation would later come to a crashing halt as the full extent of his proliferation was exposed to Pakistan and the world in general. Pakistanis were bewildered by the public humiliation of Khan and his fall from grace to general ignominy. Islamists in particular, who regarded Khan as one of their own, were quick to claim evidence of a western plot to tarnish the reputation of a national hero. The fact that the national hero has now admitted that he personally delivered bag loads of cash and diamonds to various military officers seems not to trouble the Islamist zealots who regard it as a wider conspiracy against the world of Islam.

Salam was a Pakistani patriot throughout his life who, despite having lived in the UK for many years, refused to take up British citizenship. For, as he told my father, if the day came that he was ever awarded the Nobel Prize, he wanted the honour to go to Pakistan. He regarded himself as a Muslim and part of the Muslim ummah and, upon receiving the prize in Stockholm recited verses of the Quran during his acceptance speech, dressed to the hilt in full Pakistani national dress. He was buried in Pakistan and his gravestone was inscribed with the words describing him as the first Muslim Nobel Laureate. The government of Pakistan instructed that the word ‘Muslim’ be erased, leaving the nonsensical inscription describing Salam as the first Nobel Laureate.

The lives of both Professor Abdus Salam and A Q Khan are linked inextricably with Pakistan’s nuclear programme. Both represented the two faces of Pakistan and its twin curses. Whilst Salam fell victim to the adoption in Pakistan of a virulent and pernicious version of Islam that countenanced nothing but its own Deobandi/Wahabi orthodoxy, Khan fell victim to the curse of greed and corruption that afflicts modern-day Pakistan.

Had fate not intervened with Pakistan’s lurch to religious extremism and the adoption of obscurantist Islamist ideology, Salam may have led Pakistan towards a renaissance in scientific excellence and the adoption of a nuclear energy programme that not only provided the deterrence that Pakistan so desperately craved but a civilian nuclear programme that would have solved Pakistan’s energy crisis.

Instead, the metallurgist and future nuclear proliferator A Q Khan was instrumental in giving Pakistan the bomb but, at the same time, betrayed its national interest for that most venal of reasons — a bag full of cash and diamonds.

 

(Concluded)

 

The writer is a lawyer working in the Middle East. He writes on regional affairs and can be reached at [email protected]

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

SBP reserves climb to $17.19 billion

Naqvi calls for joint SCO security strategy

US-Iran peace could unlock $20bn for Pakistan

Govt unveils fixed tax scheme for traders

FIFA launches World Cup game on Netflix

Pakistan

Naqvi calls for joint SCO security strategy

US-Iran peace could unlock $20bn for Pakistan

Momina Iqbal’s PECA complaint lands MPA in case

AJK elections slated for July 27; EC issues code

Khawaja Asif rejects demand on AJK refugee seats issue

More Posts from this Category

Business

Govt introduces fixed tax scheme for small traders nationwide

Gold and silver prices decline after market correction

Bitcoin slump deepens as investors chase AI opportunities

Weekly inflation eases as prices of some essentials decline

Federal budget proposes funding for Karachi development projects

More Posts from this Category

World

Iran ties peace deal to Lebanon ceasefire

CNN claims Israel used secret Azerbaijan bases

Iran fires warning missiles at US warships

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.