• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

By Shahzad Malik

Lok Virsa wins ‘illegal’ tuck shop case against private company

Published on: October 5, 2016 2:40 AM

ISLAMABAD: Lok Virsa, the National Institute of Folk and Traditional Heritage, country’s premier cultural organization won another battle in the court of law in a case pertaining to one of its facility that was misused by a private production company by setting up a tuck shop ‘illegally’.

The company had filed an FIR against the Executive Director of Lok Virsa, Dr Fouzia Saeed, three directors – Yousaf Haroon, Sajid Muneer and Ashfaq Ahmed – accusing them of breaking the locks of the tuck shop and removing items and cash from there. The officials had obtained interim pre-arrest bail which was challenged by the company.

The Executive Director, however, opted not to seek any pre-arrest bail. The appellants termed the FIR bogus which was filed after a lapse of six days of the incident.

Additional District and Sessions Judge Muhammad Adnan, on October 1, 2016 rejected the plea of the company against the bail applications of the three officials of Lok Virsa and confirmed their pre-arrest interim bail asking them to submit Rs 50,000 surety and personal bonds within a week.

The complainant, a PPP Senator who owns Cosmos Productions, had lodged an FIR in the Aabpara Police Station and also filed a civil suit in the court seeking the officials’ arrest and an injunction on the Lok Virsa action.

The judge observed, “Elements of malafide and ulterior motives by the complainant and the police could not be ruled out”.

He also observed that the police report does not suggest that the complainant had furnished any document of permission in its favour even for putting [up] ‘portable kiosks’ what to speak of setting up ‘tuck shop’.

The judge also held that the complainant even did not furnish to the police its own inventory, stock registers, daily cash books, ledgers etc., to support its claim about the inventory and cash mentioned in the FIR.

The judge observed that the facility was given to the private company on a 10-year lease on July 7, 2004 for setting of a cafeteria and not a tuck shop.

“I do not find any word like ‘Tuck Shop’, [the two] parties agreed to set up in the open space. Needless to say that tuck shop is not the synonymous of portable kiosk(s),” the judge said.

The company’s counsel, however, claimed that the company had set up “kiosks” and that they are not occupying any room.

The judge observed that under the rental deed, the right to grant permission for usage of an open space was reserved by the Lok Virsa management.

The Lok Virsa management on Sept 30, 2008 entered into a lease agreement with the company for use of 4,159 square feet area adjacent to the Open Air Theatre. However, the company set up a ‘tuck shop’ in violation of the lease agreement.

The appellant further said that on January 8, 2016, the Lok Virsa management on the directions of the Board of Directors issued letter to the company to vacate the room. The institute had earlier communicated to the company on January 4, and 6 to vacate the rooms.

However, on January 11, 2016, the Cosmos Productions Chief Executive Officer Tabinda Zafar in her response claimed that the company is not occupying the rooms.

Upon this, the Lok Virsa workers on January 12 shifted the items from the tuck shop after making their inventory list.

On January 13, the company filed a civil suit in the court seeking a permanent injunction on the issue but did not mention the incident mentioned in the FIR. The Lok Virsa officials on Feb 25, 2016 also filed an application under arbitration act for pre-arrest bail which was granted. The company, however, contested the application.

The judge directed further inquiry on the application and confirmed the bails.

Filed Under: Islamabad

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

4.9-magnitude quake felt in Lahore

HEC tightens rules for foreign degrees

SBP reserves climb to $17.19 billion

Naqvi calls for joint SCO security strategy

US-Iran peace could unlock $20bn for Pakistan

Pakistan

4.9-magnitude quake felt in Lahore

Naqvi calls for joint SCO security strategy

US-Iran peace could unlock $20bn for Pakistan

Momina Iqbal’s PECA complaint lands MPA in case

AJK elections slated for July 27; EC issues code

More Posts from this Category

Business

Govt unveils fixed tax scheme for traders

Govt introduces fixed tax scheme for small traders nationwide

Gold and silver prices decline after market correction

Bitcoin slump deepens as investors chase AI opportunities

Weekly inflation eases as prices of some essentials decline

More Posts from this Category

World

Iran ties peace deal to Lebanon ceasefire

CNN claims Israel used secret Azerbaijan bases

Iran fires warning missiles at US warships

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.