• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 5, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Zia Ur Rehman

Zia Ur Rehman

<em>The writer is a media and communications professional. He can be contacted at [email protected] or Twitter: zia051</em>

Regulating private schools

Published on: September 19, 2019 2:47 AM

September 19, 2019 by Zia Ur Rehman

The government should improve its own schools instead of creating problems for private schools. Let private schools operate as an open market economy to charge high fee to the parents against quality education. Let parents decide whether they want to send their kids to private schools or public sector schools. These are the popular arguments of private schools owners in the media and the lower courts. If we agree to this logic, then other business should also be allowed to charge whatever they want. For instance a vegetable seller may be allowed to sell veggies and fruits at higher prices than the market. Let people decide whether they want to buy or chose an alternate. Why the Districts’ authorities regulate prices and impose heavy fines in case of adherence to the rate lists issued on daily and weekly basis and displayed at every shop.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Friday, September 13, announced a detailed judgment of private schools fee. The court said that private schools, in violation of the law, had excessively increased fee since 2017 and that the charges should be restored to what they were in January 2017. January 2017 was the time when parents started campaign against private school fee. It took almost three years to the parents to get the final judgment of the apex court, however, implementation of it is still a question mark.

Despite the detailed judgment of the Supreme Court regarding private schools fee, regulatory authorities from Khyber to Karachi are unable to implement SC orders because private schools owners have obtained stay orders from the lower courts eventually barring education authorities from addressing parents’ complaints against fee increase by the private schools. At the same time, private schools have massively increased their fee for 2019-20.

The Supreme Court on June 12, 2019, in its short order, had stopped schools from increasing school’s fee beyond 5%, however, schools not only increased fee but also introduced new brackets in which they are charging additional fee. These subheads include security, green school, robotics, ICT, Chinese, school ID card, school portal, yearly book, and lab charges. The schools’ management, on one hand, increased the fee while on the other hand are also charging hefty annual charges from the parents. According to the Private Educational Institutions Regulatory Authority, schools cannot charge fee other than tuition fee besides one-time registration and security fee at the time of admission. The apex court needs to check whether private schools implemented its order of June 12, 2019 regarding 5% increase or violated it. A simple check will reveal that almost all elite schools violated its order using lower courts and hiring expensive lawyers.

There is no second opinion regarding private schools providing relatively better quality education than the government schools. However, that quality difference should not be used as a license to penalize parents in terms of financial burden

While thousands of parents are registering complaints through the Prime Minister Citizens Portal, their complaints are not processed because of the stay-orders on these regulatory authorities. The current government and the Supreme Court need to empower education authorities so that they ensure 100% implementation of the Supreme Court orders. This is not so simple because public servants and parliamentarians have their own kids enrolled in these private schools. Majority of them receive discounts or waivers from these schools which further undermines their moral courage and will to be part of such reforms process and empowering of regulatory authorities. In some cases, especially in Punjab, close relatives of politicians also serve as corporate employees of these schools.

While the Supreme Court of Pakistan made its utmost efforts to resolve the issue of private schools fee, its judgment remains focused on the private schools only. The detailed judgment does not bound the education departments to improve its public sector schools which have failed to attract a large majority of the urban population. Education has been used as part of the party manifestos but hardly any change has been seen in the education sector during last few years. Today Pakistan has more than 26 million out of school children, third highest in the world.

There is no second opinion regarding private schools providing relatively better quality education than the government schools. However, that quality difference should not be used as a license to penalize parents in terms of financial burden. While the majority of the private schools are affordable and law-abiding, there are also elite schools which have turned into high demand businesses. They don’t want to be accountable to the state neither to the parents or any authority. These schools should be regulated and brought under the writ of the state. If vegetable sellers, restaurants, petrol pumps and butcher shops and other business, who also don’t force consumers to buy from them, can be checked against rate-lists then why not private schools, No one should be above the state. The empowerment of regulatory institutions is the only way forward to implement Supreme Court orders of September 13, 2019.

The writer is a public policy commentator and communications professional

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Mohsin Naqvi pledged full support to Sindh govt to encounter crime and drugs

Expert warns Karachi’s heat crisis is becoming a public health threat

Jamieson created a spell to bowl England out for just 140 of first Test at Lord’s

Pakistan secured a convincing 3-0 victory over the Maldives

Oil falls on hopes of broader peace after Lebanon, Israel halt fighting

Pakistan

Mohsin Naqvi pledged full support to Sindh govt to encounter crime and drugs

Expert warns Karachi’s heat crisis is becoming a public health threat

Bilawal seeks heavy public mandate to protect GB’s rights

PM directs pilot launch of automated tax collection system in Islamabad

Federal budget on June 10

More Posts from this Category

Business

Meat exports grow by 4.16%

SBP-held foreign reserves rise by $43m to $17.9bn

Gold prices up by Rs 1,523 per tola

Rupee strengthens against dollar

Pakistan’s exports to US up by 1.70% to $5.12bn in 10 months

More Posts from this Category

World

No sign of progress in US-Iran talks as Hezbollah rejects truce

Vast accelerates race to replace ISS

Gulf crisis drives India-Venezuela oil partnership

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.