• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

By Syed Sabeeh

PM, Maryam submits assets’ documentary evidences before SC

Published on: November 15, 2016 12:08 PM

 

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his daughter Maryam Nawaz submitted documentary evidence on the legitimacy of their assets before the Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday.

The documents comprising 397 pages contain details of transactions as well as receipts of payments since 2011, also submitted a letter from a Qatari prince stating he gave money to the Sharif family for the purchase of flats in London.

The documents confirmed that Hussain Nawaz is the ‘owner’ of the Trust holding these companies. The documents also consist of details of PM’s wealth tax of 2011 and 2012. The prime minister has also submitted nomination papers and his daughter’s wealth tax details.

The SC has termed the letter of Qatar’s former ruler as ‘heresay’. However, the court observed that the letter would be examined as to whether it has value of evidence or not. The letter was produced by Akram Sheikh, counsel for PM’s children, before a larger bench, which resumed Panamagate hearing today. The letter is written by Hamid Bin Jasim bin Jaffer Althani of Qatar’s royal family.

The letter stated the relationships of the prime minister with Qatar’s royal family. Akram Sheikh pleaded before the court to keep its confidentiality. But Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, member of the bench, observed that the letter will be public once it becomes part of record.

The court directed to produce a photocopy of letter. Akram Sheikh could not be satisfied the court as to whether the undersigned of letter will appear before the court of Pakistan to record his statement. The court directed the parties to exchange documents, which are claimed to be evidences, to examine.

The letter addressing the apex court states that PM Nawaz invested 12 million Dirhams in the Al Thani company belonging to the Qatari prince’s father in 1980. “In the year 2006, the accounts in relation to the above investment were settled between Hussain Nawaz Sharif and Al Thani family, who then delivered the bearer shares of the companies referred in para 4 above to a representative of Hussain Nawaz Sharif,” the letter read.

  

However, responding to the letter Justice Khosa asked Sharif family counsel, Akram Sheikh, whether the Qatari prince will appear as witness in court. The justice also observed the letter contradicts PM’s earlier stance on the London flats.

A five-member larger bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, resumed hearing of the petitions seeking a probe into the Panama Leaks and disqualification of Prime Minister Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif. Maryam Nawaz submitted the evidence required by the court, her brothers Hassan and Hussain Nawaz, both of whom live abroad, failed to submit relevant documents.

– Documents of PTI not related to case –

The SC said that the documents submitted by Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf (PTI) were not even related to the case which was being heard. Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed, who was also part of the larger bench, commented that the documents submitted by the PTI also contained clippings from newspapers. He said that the petitioner himself had buried the truth.

Panama scandal: PTI submits ‘evidence’ against Sharifs in SC

“Newspaper clippings cannot be considered as evidence,” he said. Chief Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali remarked that documents consisting of 1600 pages from one party were submitted while the other party to the case had submitted 700 pages. “We are not computer machines in which you feed paper and the answer immediately comes out,” he said. The case has adjourned till 17 November.

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Pakistan

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Israeli strikes kill 10 despite ceasefire push

Lebanese president tells Iran to stay out

4.9-magnitude quake felt in Lahore

HEC tightens rules for foreign degrees

SBP reserves climb to $17.19 billion

Pakistan

4.9-magnitude quake felt in Lahore

Naqvi calls for joint SCO security strategy

US-Iran peace could unlock $20bn for Pakistan

Momina Iqbal’s PECA complaint lands MPA in case

AJK elections slated for July 27; EC issues code

More Posts from this Category

Business

Govt unveils fixed tax scheme for traders

Govt introduces fixed tax scheme for small traders nationwide

Gold and silver prices decline after market correction

Bitcoin slump deepens as investors chase AI opportunities

Weekly inflation eases as prices of some essentials decline

More Posts from this Category

World

Israeli strikes kill 10 despite ceasefire push

Lebanese president tells Iran to stay out

Iran ties peace deal to Lebanon ceasefire

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.