The United Nations Security Council is once again divided, this time over a proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway is very important because nearly one-fifth of the world’s oil and gas passes through it. Any disruption affects global prices and everyday life in many countries, including Pakistan.
The proposal has been pushed by Gulf countries through Gulf Cooperation Council, with Bahrain leading the effort. The United States, a main reason behind its closure, is supporting the move, which would allow countries to use “all defensive means” to secure shipping routes.
However, countries like China and Russia have raised serious concerns. Even France has warned that using force could make the situation worse. The crisis began after Iran closed the strait following US and Israeli strikes. Since then, oil shipments have been disrupted, costs have gone up, and tensions in the region have increased. Gulf countries say their economies are suffering, as they depend heavily on oil and gas exports.
But the real question is: what should come first?
Right now, the focus seems to be on reopening the strait, even if it means using force. This approach is risky. It can increase conflict and push the region towards a bigger war. Instead, the world must first address the root cause. And that is the ongoing war against Iran.
The Security Council should not rush to approve actions that may lead to more violence. Its primary role is to maintain peace, not to support moves that can escalate tensions. Before discussing shipping routes and trade, there must be serious efforts to stop the war.
Once the fighting ends, the issue of the Strait of Hormuz can be resolved through dialogue. Iran can be engaged and persuaded to reopen the route. Regional countries, especially Arab states, should take the lead in talking to Iran. Diplomacy, not force, is the only sustainable solution. *