• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Thursday, June 11, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Imtiaz Gul

Imtiaz Gul

<em>The writer is Editor, Strategic Affairs, and also heads the independent Centre for Research and Security Studies, Islamabad and author of Pakistan: Pivot of Hizbu Tahrir's Global Caliphate. Can be reached at [email protected]</em>

Capitol Hill offers no rosy view on Afghan situation

Published on: September 30, 2017 9:14 AM

Washington: Trump Administration’s Afghanistan Strategy continues to remain subject to controversy and confusion. There are conflicting messages coming out of Washington DC. While the President says ‘we will win’, his secretary of state Rex Tillerson’s position can be summed up: ‘we may not win, but neither will you, and at some point, we have to come to the negotiating table and find a way to bring this to an end’.

Discussions with officials at the Capitol Hill suggest that despite the obvious difference in connotation, both Trump and Tillerson are in agreement on one issue – most of the point men assigned for political reconciliation at the State Department are being shown the door. No replacements are envisaged either – at least for the moment after their contracts run out in the coming days. Most of the permanent employees at the State Department, too, are being posted out for other tasks.

This has also triggered speculation as to whether the doors have been slammed on the political option for the time being with a view to ‘beat Taliban into weakness and force them into talks’.

But will this also mean the demise of the Taliban’s political office in Doha, Qatar? Some of the officials around Tillerson, particularly those with military background, believe that Doha office has lost its relevance. To justify this position, they point to little progress in peace talks and an apparent disconnect between the political office and Taliban commanders on ground in Afghanistan.

The latest meeting between US Defence Secretary James Mattis and Indian Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman further lends credence to the view that a more aggressive approach towards the Taliban is in the offing. In the meeting in New Delhi, both officials agreed to enhance the Indian role in counter-terrorism training of Afghan troops as well as capacity building of the police force in the fight against the Taliban, who according to US officials control or contest some 45 per cent of Afghan districts at the moment.

Expanded role of Indian military is also under consideration to provide expertise in supporting the US-led training and advisory mission with Afghan security forces.

The New Delhi meeting happened at around the same time when Prime Minister Shahid Khaqaan Abbasi met US vice president Mike Pence in Washington. This meeting as well as Abbasi’s other meetings during his visit to the US featured ‘hard talk’ – an assertive Pakistani perspective on issues in Afghanistan and India. This posturing has certainly accentuated the fault lines between Pakistan and the US.

The present circumstances promise no light at the end of the tunnel. Indian role in Afghanistan is undergoing a redefinition; the US focus is on the military option; it is highly likely that Taliban office in Qatar will be closed soon; the Taliban remain inflexible; and, lastly, Washington seems convinced about this questionable belief that Pakistan controls the militia.

Meanwhile, Pakistani officials seem to delude themselves with private consolations and commitment of engagement in the Afghan process. The geo-political developments suggest otherwise at least for the time being. The circumstances seem to be ripe for continued violence and bloodshed, sadly.

 

 

Published in Daily Times, September 30th 2017.

 

Filed Under: Pakistan

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Dar, Egyptian FM push diplomatic dialogue

Algorithms reshape the future of media and information

Israel issues alert after Lebanon launches

Dar, Turkish Foreign Minister discuss Middle East tensions amid regional unrest

PTI threatens budget session boycott

Pakistan

Dar, Egyptian FM push diplomatic dialogue

Dar, Turkish Foreign Minister discuss Middle East tensions amid regional unrest

PTI threatens budget session boycott

Pakistan presses Somalia over captive citizens

Meteorological department forecasts Muharram moon sighting chances in Pakistan

More Posts from this Category

Business

Pakistan gold prices drop by over Rs9,000 per tola

Oil prices surge as US-Iran tensions threaten supplies

Pakistan GDP expands 3.7%, marking four-year high

Pakistan’s Economic Survey 2025-26 shows mixed growth as key targets missed, Aurangzeb

May sees highest-ever monthly remittances at $4.3 billion

More Posts from this Category

World

Algorithms reshape the future of media and information

Israel issues alert after Lebanon launches

Canada pushes major child safety rules for social media

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.