• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Monday, June 15, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Daily Times

Pakistan after US-India talks

Published on: August 31, 2016 7:00 PM

US support of Indian concerns of cross-border terrorism and its reiteration to Pakistan to “do more” with regard to terrorists using Pakistani soil to perpetrate attacks abroad raised quite a few alarm bells in Islamabad. All of this was said during the meeting between US Secretary of State John Kerry and Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj on Tuesday as the two countries move closer together and extend cooperation on a number of things including support for India’s civil nuclear programme, and increasing defence ties to check China’s expanding role in the region. While Pakistan has cause for concern at the growing cosiness between India and US, there is very little that Pakistan can do to actually stop this. India is a much bigger country than Pakistan with an immensely large market and a growing economy, which makes it far better placed to serve US interests in the region than Pakistan. However, the problem in Pakistan is to view this changing regional dynamic through the lens of a zero sum game. Not only does this engender unlikely conspiracy theories of India and US scheming together to destabilise Pakistan, but it has also led to falsely believing that hard alliances would serve to counter this, an approach that risks plunging Pakistan into international isolation.

In essence, all that was said between Kerry and Swaraj is nothing new for Pakistan. The US has long been asking Pakistan to do more and India has always alleged Pakistani involvement in cross-border terrorism. Unfortunately, India has taken advantage of its image of being a liberal democracy to constantly demonise Pakistan at the international stage. Its politics have been petty to say the least, and the tit-for-tat approach of India has effectively ruled out meaningful dialogue to take place between the two countries. Pakistan’s raising of the Kashmir issue at the international level has irked India, and it is now using its diplomatic muscle to isolate Pakistan. It is very unfortunate that Swaraj has ruled out talks with Pakistan until Pakistan “takes steps on the Patankhot terror attacks.” It seems lost on the Indian external affairs minister that only dialogue can break the present atmosphere of mutual hostilities and misgivings between Pakistan and India, and create the conditions necessary for the initiation of such measures.

However, Pakistan needs to engage in introspection and ponder the reasons behind its stigmatisation at the international level. It is very unfortunate that when India talks about cross-border terrorism, it can talk about the freedom with which Hafiz Saeed can issue statements from within Pakistan and use that as proof of Pakistani state’s reluctance to act against non-state actors who perpetrate terrorism beyond its border. Pakistan is in dire need of rebranding itself, and for this to happen it cannot neglect the work that needs to be done within its borders. Terrorism has become a transnational phenomenon, and Pakistan knows that those terrorists who perpetrate attacks within it have linkages to groups outside it. Hence, without regional cooperation, it would be very difficult to effectively eliminate this menace. And for this very reason, it is essential that all terrorists must be targeted without regard for whether they perpetrate terrorism within Pakistan or outside it. In order to win this diplomatic battle against India, Pakistan must deprive India of the moral high ground through which it issues its sanctimonious statements, and the only way to do this is if Pakistan shows the world it is sincere in eliminating all terrorists without any kind of distinction. *

Filed Under: Editorial

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Russian missile and drone attack damage historic Kyiv monastery

Trump heads to G7 summit amid US-Iran deal shift

Ewing Hall dispute intensifies amid preservation assurances

Shehbaz Sharif

Shehbaz announces US-Iran peace agreement

518 Sikh pilgrims from India depart for Kartarpur after ceremonies

Pakistan

Ewing Hall dispute intensifies amid preservation assurances

Shehbaz Sharif

Shehbaz announces US-Iran peace agreement

Kainat Azhar Khan appointed Islamabad traffic chief

Government cuts ministers’ petrol quota under austerity drive

Bilawal urges end to AJK sit-ins to protect country’s repute

More Posts from this Category

Business

CCRI issues heat stress advisory for cotton growers

Anwar Ratol emerging as premium mango brand

Govt, opposition trade barbs in NA over proposed budget

APPNA invites FPCCI trade delegation to US for trade, investment cooperation

Banking industry welcomes ‘growth-oriented budget’

More Posts from this Category

World

Russian missile and drone attack damage historic Kyiv monastery

Trump heads to G7 summit amid US-Iran deal shift

518 Sikh pilgrims from India depart for Kartarpur after ceremonies

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.