• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Monday, June 15, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Yasser Latif Hamdani

Yasser Latif Hamdani

Yasser Latif Hamdani is an Advocate of the High Courts of Pakistan and a member of the Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn in London. He was also a visiting fellow at Harvard Law School’s Human Rights Program for 2017-2018 academic year.

Strange bedfellows

Published on: July 2, 2017 10:00 PM

July 2, 2017 by Yasser Latif Hamdani

In 2015 Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) made a wonderful short documentary about the Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah of which I was also a part as a young professional lawyer who believes in Jinnah’s Pakistan. The documentary also featured veteran politician Elahi Bux Soomro speaking about Jinnah. This, as a student of history, I found quite interesting if not outright ironic given the antipathy his family had towards the Pakistan Movement and the Muslim League before partition.

Elahi Bux Soomro is the son of Khan Bahadur Moula Bux Soomro and the nephew of Allah Bux Mohammad Umer Soomro, former premier of Sindh. Khan Bahadur Allah Bux Soomro (as he was till October 1942) started his career in politics as a member of Abdullah Haroon’s and Shahnawaz Bhutto’s Sindh United Party. In 1938 he replaced Sindh’s first Premier Sir Ghulam Hussain Hidayetullah. Soon afterwards his government was facing a vote of no confidence from the alliance of Sindh Congress and the Hindu Independent Party in the Sindh Legislative Assembly. Given the obviously communal nature of this opposition, the Sindh’s Muslim politicians made a last ditch effort to bring unity to their ranks and invited Jinnah to come from Bombay to mediate. Jinnah’s objective was to organize a Muslim League majority in Sindh and consequently got leaders of the four Muslim parties including Khan Bahadur Allah Bux Soomro to execute an agreement to form a Muslim League ministry. Getting wind of the possibility of a united Muslim League ministry in Sindh, Sardar Vallabhai Patel and Maulana Azad immediately wired to the Sindh Congress to withdraw the vote of no confidence. A secret pact was entered into and Allah Bux Soomro immediately raised his demands to Jinnah and the Muslim League. When Jinnah and the rest of the members even acceded to his demand that Soomro should be the leader of the party in the assembly, Soomro still backed out. His government fell in 1940 when Congress joined the Muslim League in the vote of no confidence.

Allah Bux Soomro again became the premier in 1941. Allah Bux was also supported by the Ahrars, the Khaksars, Jamiat-e-Ulema Hind; all reactionary anti-Muslim League parties in Sindh. Soomro was a useful counterweight against the League for Congress even though they did not quite trust him. During this time he managed to alienate the Hurs by arresting the Sixth Pir Pagara, Pir Sibghatullah Rashdi, and imposing a specific Hur Law that sought to suppress them. The Hurs started a terrorist campaign against his government. Late in 1942, Allah Bux Soomro returned his British titles, which led to the unconstitutional action by the Governor of Sindh Sir Hugh Dow of dismissing him. A few months later, in May 1943, Hurs led by Mobhat Behan finally killed Allah Bux Soomro probably in revenge for the execution of the Sixth Pir Pagara in March 1943. Sindh Muslim League leader Khan Bahadur Ayub Khuhro, who was later the first Chief Minister of Sindh after independence, was also nominated and arrested for allegedly having encouraged the Hur Party to do so. Ultimately Sessions’ Judge Paymaster acquitted Ayub Khuhro of the charge saying that there was no strong enough motive for Khuhro to have partaken in that murder conspiracy.

Moula Bux Soomro had very famously declared in the National Assembly that his family had proudly opposed the creation of Pakistan and he was still opposed to Pakistan

Meanwhile Moula Bux Soomro, Allah Bux’s brother, took over his brother’s seat and was promptly given the title of Khan Bahadur by the British. Khan Bahadur Moula Bux Soomro later went on to become a leading member of military dictator General Ziaul Haq’s federal cabinet.

The Soomros have always been very close to the establishment in the post independence period. Not only was Moula Bux Soomro a key adviser and confidant to General Zia but his son Elahi Bux Soomro was strongly considered for the post of Prime Minister under Zia before Junejo was ultimately chosen for the post. Another grandson of Allah Bux Soomro, Abdul Hafeez Shaikh, was also a key member of the Musharraf regime. They have never hidden their antipathy to Pakistan and the ideals on which it was founded. Moula Bux Soomro had very famously declared right there in the Pakistan’s National Assembly that his family had proudly opposed the creation of Pakistan and he was still opposed to Pakistan. Yet he continued to enjoy General Zia’s confidence.

What is surprising to me is that the Pakistani establishment has always sought out key historically anti-Pakistan politicians and used them in politics for their own agenda. In the 1950s the Pakistani establishment cobbled together the short lived Republican Party which was led in West Pakistan by Dr. Khan Abdul Jabbar Khan — more famously known as Dr Khan Sahib- who was the Congress backed Premier of then NWFP Province before partition and Bacha Khan’s elder brother. Ayub Khan’s main legal advisor and draftsman for the 1962 Constitution was Manzur Qadir, the son in law of Sir Fazli Hussain another politician who had opposed Jinnah in the 1930s. Indeed Sir Fazli Hussain’s son was a high-ranking member of the Nehru government in India. Maulana Maududi who had famously called Pakistan Na-Pakistan was utilised by the Pakistani establishment and especially the military in 1970-1971 against Mujibur Rahman, who ironically had been a committed worker for the Muslim League in the 1940s. Maulana Mufti Mahmood, another leading member of Jamiat-e-Ulema Hind and someone who famously said in 1971 that he was not associated with the “sin” of making Pakistan, continued to enjoy establishment support especially during his campaign to get Ahmadis declared non-Muslim. Ironically Bacha Khan’s supposedly secular National Awami Party was front and center during the move with his son Wali Khan voting proudly to achieve the excommunication of that tiny sect by the parliament. Mufti Mahmood’s son Maulana Fazlur Rahman to this day is the establishment’s go to guy and was instrumental in getting Musharraf’s 17th Amendment passed.

On 23 March 1980, General Ziaul Haq, Pakistan’s worst military dictator, awarded Ghani Khan, Bacha Khan’s son, the Sitara-e-Imtiaz which Ghani Khan proudly and graciously accepted. Ghani Khan was the same person who had abused Jinnah in his book on Pathans and had also openly colluded with Faqir of Ipi in his revolt against Pakistan in 1947-1948. Agha Shorish Kashmiri was another darling of the Pakistani establishment. He was a Majlis-e-Ahrar politician who had notably written many a tract against the creation of Pakistan and had even invented a fake interview with Maulana Azad to discredit Jinnah and the Pakistan Movement. In 1986 the blasphemy law in the parliament was presented by Apa Nisar Fatima at General Zia’s behest. She came from a staunch Ahrari family.

I have nothing against people who opposed the creation of Pakistan or had different views. What I don’t understand is why the Pakistani establishment, especially the military establishment, has always chosen to ally itself with them almost exclusively to subvert and retard the democratic process? I do not mean to offend anyone but as a Pakistani I have a right to know.

 

 

The writer is a practising lawyer. He blogs at http://globallegalforum.blogspot.com and his twitter handle is @therealylh

 

 

Published in Daily Times, July 3rd, 2017.

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Shehbaz Sharif

Shehbaz announces US-Iran peace agreement

518 Sikh pilgrims from India depart for Kartarpur after ceremonies

Kainat Azhar Khan appointed Islamabad traffic chief

Government cuts ministers’ petrol quota under austerity drive

US-Iran agreement

Iran outlines key terms of draft US agreement

Pakistan

Shehbaz Sharif

Shehbaz announces US-Iran peace agreement

Kainat Azhar Khan appointed Islamabad traffic chief

Government cuts ministers’ petrol quota under austerity drive

Bilawal urges end to AJK sit-ins to protect country’s repute

Trump blames Israel for delay in signing Iran deal

More Posts from this Category

Business

CCRI issues heat stress advisory for cotton growers

Anwar Ratol emerging as premium mango brand

Govt, opposition trade barbs in NA over proposed budget

APPNA invites FPCCI trade delegation to US for trade, investment cooperation

Banking industry welcomes ‘growth-oriented budget’

More Posts from this Category

World

518 Sikh pilgrims from India depart for Kartarpur after ceremonies

US-Iran agreement

Iran outlines key terms of draft US agreement

Global leaders welcome US-Iran peace agreement

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.