• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Monday, July 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Zaigham Abbas

Zaigham Abbas

<em>The writer teaches political Science at GC University Lahore</em>

Gilgit-Baltistan Order 2018: an eyewash

Published on: May 15, 2018 12:29 AM

Constitutional and Political reforms have been a long-standing demand of the people of Gilgit-Baltistan. Recent events in the region reflect the rising consciousness among the masses about the constitutional and political orphanage of the region.

The recent protest movement against the imposition of taxes, while denying representation in Pakistan’s parliament is just one example. More often, the leaders of these protest movements, especially of Awami Action Committee Gilgit-Baltistan, had to face threats and arrests for exercising their right to protest. An example is Ahsan advocate, a senior lawyer and rights activist has recently been barred from practising law for lifetime, while previously he was also arrested on flimsy charges of sharing an offensive post on Facebook.

Gilgit-Baltistan has a complicated status in Pakistan’s federal framework. The reform package introduced in 2009, known as Gilgit-Baltistan Empowerment and Self-governance ordinance, gave a little autonomy to the region. Among other things, it introduced a local legislative body known as Gilgit-Baltistan Legislative Assembly, whose 24 members are elected on the basis of adult franchise. GBLA has the legislative jurisdiction over 53 subjects.

The reform package of 2009 was criticized owing to the little autonomy and self-rule since the important subjects of legislation including tourism and minerals fell under the jurisdiction of G-B Council — a body constituted by six members of Pakistan’s federal legislature and six from the GBLA. The prime minister of Pakistan heads the G-B council.

As the calls for greater autonomy and self-rule continued, the former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif constituted a committee on October 29th, 2015, which was tasked to recommend political reforms in the region. After much deliberation, the committee headed by Deputy Chairman Planning Commission Sartaj Aziz has drafted a report which is set to be tabled and passed by cabinet this month. The report if passed by the cabinet will replace the Gilgit-Baltistan Empowerment and Self-governance ordinance of 2009.

The protest movements against the imposition of taxes drew massive support from the people of GB, unified under a single slogan of ‘No taxation without representation’

The proposed reform bill has drawn much ire and criticism of different stakeholders. The order, if implemented in the current shape, would do away with the little autonomy that was granted by the 2009 ordinance.

The proposed reform ordinance gives overriding powers to the prime minister of Pakistan. It confers legislative, executive and judicial powers to the prime minister, whereas people of Gilgit-Baltistan don’t have any representation in Pakistan’s federal legislature, thus effectively deprived of any role in PM’s election.

Termed as ‘G-B Emperor Order’ on Social Media, the proposed order suggests that: “The Prime Minister shall have the powers to adopt an amendment in the existing laws or any new law in force subject to the legislative competence under sub-section 2,” As many as 50 subjects of legislation have been conferred to the Prime Minister. As per Article 41 of the proposed order, the legislative authority of Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly in its own subjects is subservient to the Prime Minister.

Similarly, the articles, 60 (4), 60(6), (d) and 99 (2) also suggest that the Law passed by Prime Minister will prevail in case a law on the same subject is passed by G-B Assembly. The proposed order also gives the right to levy taxes on the people of Gilgit-Baltistan to the Prime Minister of Pakistan. The judicial powers have also been vested on the Prime Minister. The right to appoint judges to the Supreme Appellate Court of Gilgit-Baltistan and other sub-courts has been granted to the Prime Minister whereas the jurisdiction of G-B courts is effectively zero in mainland Pakistan. This would make the Prime Minister immune to any decision of G-B courts as no decree can be passed against him.

It is interesting to note that the three years exercise of Sartaj Aziz led committee has come up with reforms which tend to roll back whatever little autonomy and right to self-rule was given by the previous order of 2009. As the administrative head of the federation, the constitution of Pakistan does not empower the Prime Minister to legislate nor does he enjoy any such power in other four provinces. The order if passed will effectively give the ultra-constitutional powers to the Prime Minister.

The proposed G-B order has drawn immense criticism on Social Media. It is regarded as eyewash which has deprived the people of G-B of their basic constitutional and political rights.

Amid the political campaign of PML-N to give ‘respect to voting’, the proposed G-B order, if passed, will no less then be a mockery of its own slogan. By denying the self-rule and constitutional rights to Gilgit-Baltistan the current government is embarking on a dangerous path as the calls for region’s empowerment have grown rapidly in recent times.

The protest movements against the imposition of taxes drew massive support from the people of Gilgit-Baltistan, unified under a single slogan of ‘No taxation without representation’. These events hint at the popular feeling of discontent and political disempowerment to which Gilgit-Baltistan has been subjected over the past seven decades. If passed and implemented, the proposed G-B order of 2018 will only amplify the grievances of people in G-B, thus pushing them further to the margins.

The writer teaches political Science at GC University Lahore

Published in Daily Times, May 15th 2018.

Filed Under: Perspectives

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Fifa lifts Balogun World Cup suspension before Belgium clash

Shehbaz Sharif, Asif Ali Zardari honour PAF officer killed while aiding woman

Mount Etna eruption lights up Sicily night sky

Neymar retires from international football after Brazil exit

Salman Khan’s old joke on Aamir Khan’s marriages goes viral again

Pakistan

Shehbaz Sharif, Asif Ali Zardari honour PAF officer killed while aiding woman

Eight tribesmen, young girl killed in Balochistan violence

Islamabad likely to host next round of US-Iran technical talks next week

Four AJK policemen abducted by banned JAAC members in Rawalakot

Government says telecom bill not drafted to benefit companies, individuals

More Posts from this Category

Business

Oil prices ease after Opec+ boosts output targets

Opec+ approves further oil output increase as Hormuz exports start to recover

Pakistan’s expanding forest cover sweetens honey industry, boosts rural livelihoods

Rapid urbanisation, demands for better civic facilities puts housing sector under strain in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Experts stress need to preserve Indus Waters Treaty amid regional tensions

More Posts from this Category

World

Mount Etna eruption lights up Sicily night sky

Neymar retires from international football after Brazil exit

Three sons of Khamenei appear at funeral, successor absent

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}