Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf has announced another round of protest politics at a time when Pakistan can least afford another spectacle. The opposition alliance and PTI say demonstrations will focus on inflation, fuel prices, loadshedding, lawlessness and Imran Khan’s treatment in jail. These are real public concerns. Yet the party has again tied dialogue to the release of its founder, turning a political opening into a personal condition.
A sit-in protest held at a main Islamabad artery to express solidarity with Imran Khan, on Thursday, once again, highlighted the cost of this habit. The blockade caused severe traffic disruption for several hours, with vehicles stuck in long queues across multiple routes in the capital and traffic coming to a standstill for around six hours.
The pattern is no better inside parliament, where PTI leaders now threaten to block the federal budget, even as households struggle with prices and businesses fear another round of uncertainty. Budget sessions are no headline rituals. To disrupt them in the name of public pain is to ignore the very pain one claims to represent.
There is also the question of political method. PTI’s public communication has too often relied on selective clips, abuse of opponents and a vicious digital machine. Fake news thrives in such soil. Official warnings about propaganda, externally sponsored terrorism and anti-Pakistan narratives should not be dismissed as routine rhetoric when hostile information campaigns now travel with militancy and diplomatic pressure.
The silence on militancy is harder to excuse. Pakistan recorded 699 terrorist attacks in 2025, with 1,034 dead and 1,366 injured. The Global Terrorism Index 2026 names TTP among the four deadliest terrorist groups in the world, the only one among them whose deaths increased. Most of this bloodletting falls on Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. A party governing Khyber Pakhtunkhwa should speak with more seriousness about Afghanistan-based sanctuaries and narratives that soften hostile violence.
This is where PTI’s politics becomes dangerously small. Pakistan faces Indian threats, Afghan-border terrorism, long and difficult frontiers, drones, cyber warfare and the needs of families whose sons do not return from the front. Defence spending, therefore, cannot be reduced to a slogan. It belongs in a sober debate about modern warfare, deterrence, border security and the welfare of martyrs’ families.
There is another reason this moment demands steadier politics. Pakistan has recently positioned itself as a channel between Iran and the United States, proof that its regional credibility has not collapsed under pressure. That diplomatic space was not won by street chaos. It was built through patience and utmost seriousness.
The party may protest, litigate and negotiate all it wants. What it cannot do is hold parliament and national security hostage and still claim the mantle of responsible opposition. *