• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Tuesday, July 7, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Agencies

Partisan control determines how US states act on voting rights

Published on: June 2, 2019 5:58 PM

New York voters for years have experienced some of the longest wait times in the nation on Election Day. Attempts to fix the problem routinely became casualties of the divided politics of the state Legislature.
That dynamic changed last November, when Democrats won majorities in both legislative chambers, and it didn’t take them long to act.
Just weeks into this year’s legislative session, they passed a bill to allow early voting, and Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo promptly signed it.
“Early voting is going to make a significant difference for countless numbers of New Yorkers by making polling places so much more accessible and allow voters to determine when it is most convenient for them,” said Susan Lerner, executive director of Common Cause New York.
New York is among a small number of states where Democrats made big gains in last year’s election and have used that power to pass laws to make it easier to register and to vote. They have introduced early voting, all-mail voting or automatic registration.
A few Republican-led states – some of which saw high turnout for Democratic candidates – are going in the opposite direction, advancing bills to tighten voter registration and early voting.
“Some of this seems like a fairly direct response to things that happened in the midterms,” said Max Feldman, who tracks voting laws at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University’s School of Law.
In New Mexico, Democrats not only expanded their majority in the state House but also claimed the governor’s mansion after eight years of GOP control. By March, Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham had signed a law to allow people to register and vote on the same day beginning in 2021. Previously, registration ended 28 days before an election.
Hawaii lawmakers approved legislation replacing the in-person voting system with one made up entirely of mailed ballots. If the measure is signed into law, the state will join Colorado, Oregon and Washington with mail-only voting. Delaware approved in-person, early voting beginning in 2022.
While bills increasing voter access this year far outnumbered those seeking to impose restrictions, many of the expansion bills were put forward by Democratic lawmakers in states led by Republicans. That means they are unlikely pass.
In the 2018 elections, Democrats nearly doubled to 14 the number of states in which they control the governor’s office and both legislative chambers, but Republicans remain in charge in more states – 22.
While some voting reforms such as automatic registration have drawn bipartisan support, Republicans generally have opposed same-day registration, mail-only voting and other changes, saying they increase the potential for fraud.
In Connecticut, Republicans recently thwarted a push by Democrats to do as New York did and add in-person, early voting. Democrats have a legislative majority there, but a constitutional amendment is required to make the change, and they fell short of garnering the votes necessary to put the issue on the ballot.
Republicans had expressed concern that early voters might come to regret their selections if a race’s dynamics shifted after they had turned in their ballot.
GOP lawmakers in some states also have targeted groups that register voters. They say such groups can create a burden for local election officials if they turn in large numbers of forms that are incomplete or contain false information.
In Tennessee, Republican Gov. Bill Lee signed a law that allows for fines against groups turning in 100 or more incomplete registration forms in a year.
“This bill was presented because of actual circumstances that were meant to confuse the integrity, or to create a lack of integrity, in the voting process,” Lee said.
Critics say Tennessee’s Republicans feel threatened by an increase in voter participation last year. In 2018, turnout in the state was 51 percent higher than in the previous midterm election. About 259,500 new voters registered in the six months before Election Day.
“What politicians should be doing is making sure that local election officials have the adequate resources to do their jobs,” ACLU attorney Sophia Lakin said in announcing a federal lawsuit challenging the new law. “Silencing civic groups’ voices is not the solution.”
In Texas, where Democrats picked up two congressional seats last year, lawmakers have been considering a bill that would make it a felony rather than a misdemeanor to knowingly put false information on a voter registration form. It would also increase scrutiny of those who provide transportation for voters headed to the polls.
The legislation passed the state Senate but stalled in the House.
Voter-suppression claims also have been made against Republicans in Florida, over a constitutional amendment voters approved last year that would make it easier for convicted felons to regain the right to vote.
Republican lawmakers, in drafting legislation to implement the amendment, said its language about felons having to complete “all terms of their sentence including parole or probation” also meant paying all court fees, fines and restitution before being eligible to vote.
“This measure is nothing but a poll tax that would effectively disenfranchise those who are unable to pay,” Rep. Marcia L. Fudge, an Ohio Democrat, said during a recent congressional hearing in Florida.
The bill’s sponsor, GOP state Sen. Jeff Brandes, defended it, saying: “Our goal was to follow the constitution, and the constitution is clear – ‘all terms of the sentence.'”

Filed Under: World Tagged With: Partisan, US states

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Maryam Nawaz

Punjab Announces 4 Acres of Farmland on Rs100 Annual Lease for Poor Farmers

Mindanao shaken by 5.8 magnitude earthquake

Mumbai rains kill six, disrupt travel

UN seeks global safeguards for artificial intelligence

China raises Nanning flood emergency

Pakistan

Maryam Nawaz

Punjab Announces 4 Acres of Farmland on Rs100 Annual Lease for Poor Farmers

WB pushes Pakistan to cut spending

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari

Bilawal Bhutto Vows to Defend Indus River, Promises Constitutional Rights for Gilgit-Baltistan

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa federal funds

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Received Over Rs34 Trillion in Federal Funds During Five Years

PM Shehbaz launches drive for overseas opportunities

More Posts from this Category

Business

Oil prices fluctuate amid market uncertainty

Gold prices fall by Rs2,400 per tola in Pakistan

Oil prices ease after Opec+ boosts output targets

Opec+ approves further oil output increase as Hormuz exports start to recover

Pakistan’s expanding forest cover sweetens honey industry, boosts rural livelihoods

More Posts from this Category

World

Mindanao shaken by 5.8 magnitude earthquake

Mumbai rains kill six, disrupt travel

UN seeks global safeguards for artificial intelligence

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}