• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Saturday, June 6, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Agencies

ATC adjourns Imran Farooq case hearing until May 24

Published on: May 15, 2019 12:26 AM

An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) on Tuesday adjourned the hearing of the Dr Imran Farooq case till May 24 and also allowed for submission of more documents by the defense.

As ATC judge Shahrukh Arjumand resumed the hearing on Tuesday, the counsel representing accused Khalid Shamim requested the court for more time for submission of additional documents in defense of his client. The court accepted the request and ordered to enlist the documents along the case property.

The court also directed the defense counsel for completion of arguments on the documents submitted before the court at the next date of hearing.

During the previous hearing, the court had recorded the statements of accused Khalid Shamim and Mohsin under sections 342 CrPC. The court adjourned the hearing till May 24.

During the previous hearing, both the accused had denied their confessional statements recorded earlier before a magistrate. The accused claimed that their previous statements had been given under coercion.

Three suspects – Khalid Shamim, Syed Mohsin Ali and Moazzam Ali – had been indicted in the case, while four others were declared proclaimed offenders.

Two of the suspects, Khalid Shamim and Syed Mohsin Ali, had earlier recorded their confessional statements, alleging that the slain Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) leader was killed because he was a “threat to the leadership of MQM”.

Imran Farooq was murdered outside his house in London on September 16, 2010.

Filed Under: Islamabad Tagged With: ATC, ATC adjourns, case hearing, Imran farooq case, MQM

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Alexander Zverev eases past Jakub Mensik in French Open semifinals

Taylor to face Pili in Croke Park farewell

FIFA bans vuvuzelas from World Cup stadiums

France brush off Ivory Coast loss, call it timely World Cup reminder

Legendary boxer Muhammad Ali’s 10th death anniversary observed

Pakistan

JAAC declared proscribed party ahead of AJK polls on July 27

Fixed tax scheme for small retailers launched to raise Rs 50bn annually

Govt cuts petrol price by Rs 4 per litre, keeps diesel’s unchanged

Bilawal promises GB voters with land and job rights

Iran declares support for Hezbollah with wider peace deal in doubt

More Posts from this Category

Business

SBP’s ‘Go Cashless’ campaign saw Rs 34bn in digital transactions on Eid

Short-term inflation down by 0.56%

Saudi-Pak Business Council shows interest in infrastructure investment

‘Govt, allies united in efforts to craft people-centric budget’

Rupee records gain against US dollar

More Posts from this Category

World

CENTCOM space post signals wider US military footprint

US official delivers Trump’s “good hello” to Putin

NASA lifts ISS evacuation alert after leak

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.