• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Friday, June 19, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi
Lal Khan

Lal Khan

<em>The writer is the editor of Asian Marxist Review and International Secretary of Pakistan Trade Union Defence Campaign. He can be reached at [email protected]</em>  

The 1946 Revolution – history’s loss! Part I

Published on: February 26, 2019 2:41 AM

February 26, 2019 by Lal Khan

Truth, as they say, is the first casualty of war. The situation of the ruling classes of India and Pakistan is so disdainful that they cannot go to a full-fledged war nor can they sustain a genuine peace. However, in the prevalent crisis sharp border clashes, lethal surgical strikes or some dangerous militaristic act by the Modi regime cannot be ruled out. The rhetoric with which the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) regime has whipped up hysteria so close to the forthcoming elections in weeks, with mounting international pressure, the restraint from carrying out such belligerent acts would be extremely difficult for the reactionary Indian state and the Modi Sarkar. In the last few decades they have contrived virtual wars and hoaxes of peace. In the ongoing rhetoric of war and the Hindutva chauvinism being propped up by the subcontinent’s elite, once again truth and sanity are the foremost victims. It’s the organic nature of the region’s postcolonial bourgeoisie being reflected in their hypocrisy, crookedness and deceit of their politics, ethics, morality and character. These odious characteristics stem from their origins.

The so-called independence of the South Asian subcontinent was won not through a struggle led by the national bourgeois leaders but through negotiations and deals with the British Raj’s wily bureaucrats. Such ‘liberations’ never transform the lives of the populace or ensure social prosperity. The old rotten system continues to coerce the masses only with superficially shaped contours and colours of the elite and the state. India and Pakistan were artificially grafted and imposed by the ruling elites and the British imperialists . This resulted in the continuance of the rule of the capitalist caricature set up by the Raj. These upstart elites continued to practise the British ploy of ‘divide and rule’ to perpetuate their exploitative rulership. With capitalism surviving in this subcontinent, the imperialist plunder persisted even after the end of direct colonial rule. Hence the war mongering and whipping up of religious and nationalistic chauvinism that we have witnessed for the last seven decades is a necessary manoeuvre for the elites if they are to maintain their rulership.

History is witness to the fact that the British, in connivance with their toady native elites, could only enforce this set up after the betrayal and defeat of one of the most glorious episodes of mass upheaval for liberation-the 1946 revolution, distorted as the “Sailors’ Mutiny”. These bourgeois historians have repeatedly falsified the true facts and events that led to independence. Internationally and regionally, these narratives proclaimed that this independence was won by the Indian National Congress led by Gandhi, Patel, Nehru and the Muslim League led by Jinnah. While they conveniently conceal the struggles and the formidable role of workers, the youth and peasants. But above all, by the revolts of the soldiers, sailors and airmen of the Indian army, navy and air force in the struggle for independence. Marx had elaborated that during and after the first Indian war of Independence in 1857, the British conquered India by using the Indian troops. However by 1946, the British could no longer confidently rely on the Indian troops to sustain their coercive rule. There was a volcanic rebellion starting with the sailors of the Royal Indian Navy that shocked the wily strategists of the Raj.

This revolt led by the sailors and workers had forced the British to an early departure from the subcontinent and the movement was on the verge of abolishing the socioeconomic system that has enslaved the oppressed masses for generations. This protraction of the capitalist caricature imposed by the Raj has been the root cause of the misery, deprivation, tyranny, bigotry and bloodshed that has been ravaging the subcontinent’s masses. The largest concentration of poverty on the planet in South Asia proves the dismal failure of this system. The atrocious counter-revolution to crush the 1946 revolution was inflicted through the bloodied partition of 1947, the wounds of which are still festering.

Seventy-two years ago in this week of February 1946, a revolutionary spark triggered a heroic uprising that engulfed the South Asian subcontinent where the masses were up in arms defying the might of the imperialists and the repressive colonial state. The ebbing of this revolutionary wave and its defeat though the deceit and sabotage of the local leaders led to the horrors of this Partition based on sectarian barbarity that drenched particularly Punjab and Bengal in innocent blood. Carving up of the Indian subcontinent on religious lines resulted in massacres, with the killing of over one and a half million souls and enforced migration of over twenty million.

This revolt led by the sailors and workers had forced the British to an early departure from the subcontinent and the movement was on the verge of abolishing the socioeconomic system that has enslaved the oppressed masses for generations

The gallant episode of the Sailors’ Revolt offers enormous lessons and examples of the audacious role and courage that it instilled in the hearts and minds of the ordinary people in such revolutionary periods that are historical exceptions. The naval revolt of February 1946 erupted due to the accumulation of resentment over a long period among the sailors. The salary of the British sailors was 10 times more than that of the Indian sailors, as were their perks and privileges. However, the major cause of the revolt was political. The trial of the Indian National Army (INA) leaders and its struggle during the siege of Imphal, where the INA inflicted massive damage on the British army gave the sailors a profound belief that the mighty British Empire was not all that invincible.

The revolt started on February 18, 1946, when 1100 sailors on the HMS Talwar at the Bombay harbour, stopped work and declared an official strike at dawn. The sailors unanimously elected signalman MS Khan as President and petty officer telegraphist Madan Singh as Vice-President. Leading signaller Bedi Basant Singh, SC Sen Gupta, Chief Petty Officer, School Master Nawaz, Seaman Ashraf Khan, Able Stokers Gomez and Mohammad Hussain to the Central Strike Committee. This Committee had a resolute destiny for their struggle in action-complete political and socioeconomic liberation.

In the Bombay Harbour, the revolt quickly spread to 22 ships, the Castle and Fort Barracks in the shore bases. The strikes spread like wildfire to the naval establishments in Karachi, Madras, Vishakhapatnam, Calcutta, Delhi, Cochin, Jamnagar, and Andaman Islands on to the shores of the Middle East in Bahrain and Aden. They were able to win over almost all the 70 ships and all the 20 seashore naval cantonments with over 30,000 sailors actively participating in the revolt. The next morning, Indian sailors seized military vehicles in the dockyards, and drove around Bombay chanting slogans, ‘Hindu-Muslim eik hain’ (Hindus and Muslims are one). The Central Strike Committee issued a leaflet that ended with the call, ‘Long live the solidarity of workers, soldiers, students and peasants. Long live Revolution’. A mass fervour of support swept across united India in support of the striking sailors. On the morning of February 21, 1946, British guards opened fire at Indian sailors in the Bombay Naval base’s Castle Barracks and this transformed the revolt into a violent armed uprising.

Hundreds of strikers from ships, minesweepers and shore establishments demonstrated near Bombay’s Victoria Terminus of the Indian Railways. When the British ordered Indian soldiers to fire at the striking sailors, the latter refused to shoot at their fellow brothers.

On February 20 and 21, the striking sailors gave a call for a general strike, which evoked an incredible response. Three hundred thousand workers put down their tools and walked out of textile factories, mills, railways, postal services, docks and other industrial and service setups in Bombay as well as other cities and towns in the country. Barricades were set up on the streets that were pitched battles of youth and workers with the police and army. The strike was a direct challenge to British rule. In Calcutta, over 120,000 people came out and other Indian cities and towns were brought to a standstill by similar strikes and demonstrations.

In Karachi, striking sailors took over the HMS. Hindustan and Bahadur ships anchored at Manora Island. The sailors then took out a procession through the streets of Karachi and were joined a large number of the city’s residents. Karachi’s British army commander sent two platoons of Baloch soldiers to suppress the revolt. The Baloch refused to fire upon their brothers. The British then called on their ‘super-loyal’ Gurkha troops to put down the revolt but were shocked when even they refused to fire upon the striking sailors. Finally, the British troops were summoned, who started firing to be met with retaliation. The firing and attacks and counter-attacks continued for four hours. Six of the sailors were killed, more than 30 were wounded. Trade unions in Karachi called a general strike, and the whole city was shut down. More than 35,000 people, including Hindus and Muslims, marched towards Eidgah and held a massive rally despite intimidation, harassment, arrests, baton charges and live firing. More than 50 protestors were arrested.

As World War II was coming to an end, India was entering a period of stormy resurgence of the working-class movement. Industrial strikes in virtually all the major cities – Bombay, Calcutta, Allahabad, Delhi, Madras, Lahore and Karachi erupted with full force. The Indian working class courageously jumped into the fray ignoring massive state oppression, arrests, beatings and even bullets as the decisive force in the struggle for liberation. Towards the end of 1945, the Bombay and Calcutta dockworkers refused to load ships going to Indonesia with supplies for troops meant to suppress the national liberation struggles there.

At the beginning of 1946, this strike wave assumed a highly political character. On January 24, 1946, 175,000 textile and industrial workers went on strike in Bombay to protest the shooting of demonstrators celebrating the birthday of Subhash Chandra Bose, leader of the “Azad (Free) Indian Government” and organiser of the Indian National Army. Railway workers’ strikes, series of student demonstrations throughout India brought large swathes of the Indian proletariat in other sectors of industry and services into militant struggle. Throughout these demonstrations the inspiring and fiery slogan “Long Live the Revolution!” was echoing across united India.

The last years of colonial rule also saw a remarkably sharp increase in strikes on economic issues all over the country – the all-India strike of the Post and Telegraph Department employees being the most prominent. The pent-up economic grievances during the war, combined with the high prices, scarcity of food and other essentials and a drop in real wages, drove the working class to the limits of its tolerance. In anticipation of freedom, expectations were rocketing to the skies. The people saw Independence as an end to their miseries. The workers were now struggling for what they hoped freedom would bring them as a matter of right.

The writer is the editor of Asian Marxist Review and International Secretary of Pakistan Trade Union Defence Campaign

Published in Daily Times, February 26th 2019.

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

South Africa Women’s Under-19 Cricket Team will tour Pakistan for the first time

Women’s T20 World Cup: SA stumble past Pakistan despite Sana’s heroics

Pakistan Weightlifting Federation names provisional team for Asian Games

‘Pakistan Idol’ expected to air in August

Zendaya shows off wedding ring after Tom Holland confirms marriage

Pakistan

Khawaja Asif

Khawaja Asif defends privatisation push

‘Non-sustainable’: Bilawal rules out more provincial budget sacrifices

Police arrest two alleged associates of Pinky

US, Iran electronically sign Islamabad MoU; Pakistan endorses as mediator

£190m case: IHC orders Imran, Bushra’s meeting with counsel within 7 days

More Posts from this Category

Business

Petrol, diesel prices may see major relief from June 20

Govt reaffirms support for electric vehicle manufacturing, localisation

ADB approves $700mn loan for Pakistan’s insurance sector

Pakistan to launch investor-friendly stock market app next month

Aurangzeb renews commitment to strengthening cotton sector

More Posts from this Category

World

Burnham parliament win piles pressure on Starmer

JD Vance

US vice president cancels Iran peace talks trip amid uncertainty

Pentagon chief lashes out at NATO allies

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.