• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Wednesday, July 8, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Jada seeks dismissal in controversial threat case

Published on: February 18, 2026 2:08 AM

Jada Pinkett Smith is asking a California court to dismiss a $3 million lawsuit filed by her former friend, Bilaal Salaam, who claims the actress threatened him at a hotel in 2021.

In a motion obtained by PEOPLE on February 16, Pinkett Smith argues that Salaam’s complaint should be struck in its entirety under California’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute. The law is designed to quickly weed out meritless claims arising from protected activity, according to the motion.

The lawsuit stems from Salaam’s allegations on the Unwine with Tasha K podcast that he witnessed her husband, Will Smith, engaging in a sexual act with actor Duane Martin. Pinkett Smith publicly dismissed those claims as “nonsense” during an interview with The Breakfast Club, which forms part of her defense. Plaintiff voluntarily gave media interviews claiming – without evidence – that he personally witnessed her husband, actor Will Smith, engaging in sexual acts,” the motion to dismiss reads. “Plaintiff’s allegations were false, uncorroborated and made to generate attention as part of an ongoing public campaign of harassment directed at Defendant and her family.”

It also notes that he disclosed confidential legal correspondence he had received from the Smiths, which the motion states is protected under California law.

Salaam filed the $3 million complaint in December 2025, alleging that the actress confronted him in the lobby of the Regency Calabasas Commons in September 2021 and threatened him. The complaint alleges that Pinkett Smith told Salaam that he would “end up missing or catch a bullet.”

Filed Under: Lifestyle Tagged With: Jada Pinkett, threat case

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Trump revives NATO tensions in Ankara

PM aide calls for review of KP lawmakers’ privileges law

Balochistan operation leaves 11 soldiers martyred, 19 militants dead

PMDC extends MDCAT 2026 registration deadlines for students

PSX tumbles after Trump Iran move

Pakistan

PM aide calls for review of KP lawmakers’ privileges law

Balochistan operation leaves 11 soldiers martyred, 19 militants dead

PMDC extends MDCAT 2026 registration deadlines for students

Punjab expands “Apna Ghar, Mehfooz Ghar” with safety initiative

Sindh plans digital examination system for education boards

More Posts from this Category

Business

PSX falls over 2,900 points in intraday trade

Pakistan forced to rely on expensive spot market imports of LNG

Cargo plane feared to crashed into Arabian Sea after losing contact with ATC

Pakistan plans market-based petroleum pricing reforms

Govt plans first dollar-settled rupee bonds, more Sukuk, Eurobond issues

More Posts from this Category

World

Trump revives NATO tensions in Ankara

Trump says Iran war accord is ‘over’, rejects new talks

Record-breaking El Nino raises global climate concerns

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}