ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) has formally rejected several crucial clauses of the proposed 27th Constitutional Amendment, citing concerns over provincial autonomy and the federal balance of power. Party sources confirmed that PPP lawmakers opposed changes they believe would weaken constitutional safeguards.
The party particularly objected to the removal of sub-clause 3A of Article 160, which governs the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award. PPP leaders argued that any provision allowing a reduction in provincial shares is unconstitutional, as the NFC framework permits only increases.
Read More: Why Pakistan Needs the 27th Constitutional Amendment?
Additionally, the PPP opposed amendments to Schedules 2 and 3 that could undermine provincial autonomy, as well as clauses aiming to place education and population management under federal control. Party officials called these measures a reversal of the spirit of the 18th Amendment.
Other points of contention included proposed changes to Article 213 regarding the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner, amendments to Article 63 (1)(c) on dual citizenship among civil servants, and the restoration of executive magistrates’ powers under Article 175. The PPP argued that these changes could compromise the independence of the Election Commission, judicial authority, and democratic governance.
Read More: Supreme Court questions proposed constitutional court
Sources said the party has conveyed its objections formally in parliamentary discussions, signaling a firm stance on protecting provincial rights and preserving the constitutional framework. The 27th Amendment continues to be a contentious issue as lawmakers debate its potential impact on Pakistan’s federal structure.