• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Trending:
  • Kashmir
  • Elections
Thursday, July 2, 2026

Daily Times

Your right to know

  • HOME
  • Latest
  • Iran-Israel war
  • Gilgit Baltistan Election
  • Pakistan
    • Balochistan
    • Gilgit Baltistan
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
    • Punjab
    • Sindh
  • World
  • Editorials & Opinions
    • Editorials
    • Op-Eds
    • Commentary / Insight
    • Perspectives
    • Cartoons
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Featured
    • Blogs
      • Pakistan
      • World
      • Lifestyle
      • Culture
      • Sports
  • Business
  • Sports
  • E-PAPER
    • Lahore
    • Islamabad
    • Karachi

Inayatullah Rustamani

Cultural wars

Published on: January 5, 2013 7:00 PM

January 5, 2013 by Inayatullah Rustamani

Cultures dominate religion and politics around the world. A country has many cultures, which, from time to time, usher in a cultural war within the same country and sometimes push two countries into a conflict. A cultural war is a clash of ideas about what one believes to be true, and where others have different viewpoints. It would not be wrong to call 2013 the year of cultural wars. Let us be clear here: a cultural war is not the creation of a religion. Even a superpower and liberal country like the US is not free of them. The interesting thing is that the US has no state religion and its first constitutional amendment is clearly against any religious law in the country, endorsing freedom of speech and unhindered practice of all religions.

In December last year, a cultural war broke out in the US with the remarks of a famous reality show ‘Duck Dynasty’ star Phil Robertson. His words of likening homosexual behaviour with bestiality in an interview to GQ magazine enraged human rights and gay rights groups. They took to the streets against him. At last, A and E networks fired him from the reality show. The issue has been at the centre of the US’s and the west’s limelight. The politician Sarah Palin, defending the Duck Dynasty star act, said in her twitter message on December 19, 2013, “Free speech is an endangered species; those ‘intolerants’ hating and taking on the Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing personal opinion takes on us all.” Twitter has barred its users from signing a petition on the website istandwithPhil.com, created by a Christian group in the support of the Duck Dynasty star to press the A and E Network to reinstate the star and apologise to him.

A cultural war does not stop here. In 2009, a New Delhi court struck down section 377, which bans homosexual marriages. This ruling was appreciated by human rights organisations but criticised by some other segments of society. The law’s detractors took to the streets, finally getting the repealed section 377 reinstated by a ruling of the apex court in December last year. The human rights organisations in India and the west are in protest against the verdict. Many believe that the strip-search of an Indian diplomat by US authorities on the charges of the underpayment to her employee has some connection with the first Indian act of banning homosexual marriages. The diplomatic row still continues.

Moreover, in October last year, the Australian parliament passed an act allowing the first gay marriage in the country. It triggered a cultural war between the pro- and anti-homosexual marriage groups in the country. Finally, in December last year, the apex court repealed that law, declaring it against an amended federal law in 2004, which clearly states that only a marriage of a man with a woman is allowed.

A cultural war has taken deep roots in Pakistan. It is the shaping factor of the laws of this country and has great impact on political and religio-political parties. When we talk of cultural wars, it is pertinent to mention the assassinated governor of Punjab, Salmaan Taseer. Many believe he was a victim of this cultural war. The speech of PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, on the sixth death anniversary of his mother, in which he openly and bravely hit the terrorists with his words in the style of his slain mother infuriated a right-wing party. The latter party took Bilawal Bhutto’s words as an attack on its culture. It gathered its supporters to demolish a wall of the Bilawal House in Karachi. The party failed in its act but defended it with lame excuses of wanting to implement a court order.

This party, along with all other right-wing parties, passed a resolution in the National Assembly condemning the hanging of Abdul Qadir Mollah by Bangladesh. The act triggered a cultural war between Pakistan and Bangladesh. The prime minister of the latter country said that her country has no place for sympathisers of Pakistan. The people protested against Pakistan, burnt its flag and the effigies of the leaders who supported the resolution.

A right-wing political party declared bombers as martyrs causing a cultural war when the left-wing parties stood against that stand. All the Islamic countries of the world have unblocked YouTube after registering their protests against the uploading of an insulting film regarding the prophet of Islam (PBUH). YouTube is officially still blocked only in Pakistan out of fear of triggering of a cultural war with its unblocking. The attacks on innocent Shias and the minorities are not religious acts but are a form of cultural war.

Interestingly, cultural wars revive old cultures and invent new ones. In the recent past, unhealthy comments by a journalist on the Sindhi Topi of then president Asif Ali Zardari has brought into fashion, every year, celebrations of the Sindhi culture in the month of December. The culture of fanaticism and intolerance has brought out two-week long Sindh cultural celebrations in the coming month of February this year by PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. Cultural wars are a world phenomenon, and it is unjust to call Pakistan a conservative country on the basis of deep rooted cultural wars. This war has restricted the US in legalising homosexual marriages just in 19 states out of total 50. Many non-religious and liberal countries ban and fine the use of the veil and this is also the manifestation of a cultural war.

 

The writer is a freelance columnist and a blogger. He can be contacted at [email protected] and tweets at @maverickir

Filed Under: Op-Ed

Submit a Comment




Primary Sidebar




Latest News

Lebanon, Syria sign non-interference pact

Craig Gillespie offers hopeful update on Cruella 2

Trump questions US spending on NATO

Josie Gibson reveals dramatic arm surgery transformation

PTI boycotts upcoming AJK elections

Pakistan

PTI boycotts upcoming AJK elections

Pakistan expands Murree Expressway network

Child dies in Lahore school collapse

FIA probes alleged human placenta trade for anti-aging injections

LHC clarifies WhatsApp group membership is not a crime

More Posts from this Category

Business

Chinese firm eyes Pakistan energy investment

SBP ends remittance rewards for overseas Pakistanis

Saudi Aramco boosts Ras Tanura oil exports to Asia

PSX jumps over 1,400 points

Report claims Elon Musk’s company SpaceX is developing AI smartphone

More Posts from this Category

World

Lebanon, Syria sign non-interference pact

Trump questions US spending on NATO

Russia launches deadly Kyiv assault

More Posts from this Category




Footer

Home
Lead Stories
Latest News
Editor’s Picks

Culture
Life & Style
Featured
Videos

Editorials
OP-EDS
Commentary
Advertise

Cartoons
Letters
Blogs
Privacy Policy

Contact
Company’s Financials
Investor Information
Terms & Conditions

Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube

© 2026 Daily Times. All rights reserved.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}